Classification of Osteoporosis.

Osteoporosis is defined by low bone quality, strength and increased fracture risk. Primary and secondary osteoporosis are the two forms of osteoporosis classified on the basis of factors affecting the metabolism of bone. Primary osteoporosis develops as a result of aging or menopause-related bone demineralization. Type I/postmenopausal and type II/senile osteoporosis are two subtypes of primary osteoporosis. Secondary osteoporosis is due to pathological conditions and medications other than aging and menopause that lead to deprivation of bone mass and elevated fracture risk. Classification of osteoporosis based on BMD testing with DEXA devised by the World Health Organization utilizes T-score in BMD reporting of women in menopausal transition or postmenopause and men ≥ 50 years. Z-scores are preferred, while BMD reporting in premenopausal women, adults < 50 years of age, and children. BMD alone is not diagnostic of osteoporosis in men < 50 years. The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool Model (FRAX) is a software algorithm that incorporates significant predictors of fracture risk and BMD in individuals to predict the risk of fracture. FRAX predicts the "10-year probability of a major fracture (hip, clinical spine, humerus, or wrist fracture) and the 10-year probability of a hip fracture".

Good validity and reliability of forgotten joint score-12 in total knee arthroplasty in Hindi language for Indian population.

PURPOSE: Commonly used patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) tools for knee joint have a ceiling effect and may not be able to differentiate between patients achieving outcomes better than the upper limit of the score. Forgotten joint score-12 (FJS-12) is said to be free of this limitation. FJS-12 has been translated and validated in different languages. This study aims to translate and validate FJS-12 in Hindi (Hindi FJS-12). METHODS: Hindi FJS-12 was tested for comprehensibility in a pilot study in 20 patients. This was followed by a prospective cohort study including 140 patients of bilateral total knee arthroplasty, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The mean age of the patients was 62.0 ± 14.5 years. There were 77 (55.2%) males and remaining were females. All patients were asked to fill up questionnaires of Hindi FJS-12, WOMAC, KSS and OKS. Hindi FJS-12 was tested for validity, reliability, responsiveness, floor effect and ceiling effect. Construct validity was expressed as the Pearson correlation coefficient. Internal consistency was expressed as Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability as the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: In the pilot study, it was seen that all the questions were well answered by most of the participants. The main study showed good construct validity with Hindi FJS-12 showing moderate correlation with WOMAC, KSS and OKS (Pearson coefficients 0.45, 0.32, 0.37, respectively). Hindi FJS-12 had excellent internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha of 0.93 (95% CI 0.90, 0.97). ICC was 0.95 (95% CI 0.90, 0.99). No floor or ceiling effect was observed. CONCLUSION: Hindi FJS-12 has high validity, reliability and reproducibility for knee function after TKA. It is devoid of floor or ceiling effect. Thus, it can be successfully used for studying knee function in the Indian population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective cohort study, Level II.

Translation and Validation of Forgotten Joint Score for Total Hip Arthroplasty for Indian Population.

BACKGROUND: The ultimate success of a total hip replacement lies in patients forgetting about their artificial joints during routine activities. "Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)" is emerging as an important tool in assessing outcomes of total hip arthroplasty. There has been no version of this score available in commonly spoken vernaculars in India. This study aims to formulate and validate the Hindi version of FJS in Indian population. METHODS: A total of 136 patients with a minimum follow-up of 6 months and a maximum follow-up of 18 months after total hip arthroplasty were asked to fill the translated and adapted version of FJS questionnaire, at two points of time 2 weeks apart. The Hindi version of FJS (I-FJS) was tested for reliability and responsiveness, floor and ceiling effect and validity against modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Construct validity was expressed as the Pearson correlation coefficient. Internal consistency was expressed as Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability as the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: I-FJS showed excellent internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha of 0.88. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.94. I-FJS showed good correlation with m-HHS (r = 0.8, p = 0.001). The standard error of measurement was 3.6 and the smallest detectable change was 9.97. There was no floor or ceiling effect observed with I-FJS. Data from this study were insufficient to establish adequate responsiveness of I-FJS. CONCLUSION: I-FJS is a valid, reliable and reproducible score for hip function in post-THA patients. It is devoid of any floor or ceiling effect. Hindi version of FJS could be an effective tool for studying hip function in the Indian population.