ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Non-invasive clinic-based tools for assessing PAD are not without limitations. Therefore, costly tests like Doppler study, CT angiography and MR angiography are often required to make a diagnosis. Ankle brachial index (ABI), commonly used for assessment of PAD, has high false positivity rates in sclerosed, calcified arteries which render them non-compressible. Toe brachial index (TBI) can be an alternative, as digital arteries are relatively unaffected by these changes. AIM: To compare the reliability of ABI and TBI in diagnosing PAD in type 2 diabetes using CT angiography (CTA) as the reference. METHODS: 175 adults with T2D were selected. ABI &TBI were measured with an automated vascular Doppler XT 6 ports bilaterally for all subjects. For any subject, the limb with lower ABI and TBI was included for analysis. ABI < 0.9 & TBI < 0.6 were taken as evidence of PAD. CTA showing > 50% narrowing was taken as evidence of PAD. RESULTS: 24% of our study subjects had CTA confirmed PAD. ABI has low sensitivity of 35.29% (95% CI 0.21-0.52) compared to TBI being 82.35% (95% CI 0.66-0.92). The specificity however was similar. ABI < 0.9 was able to detect CTA confirmed PAD, but ABI > 0.9, including the so-called normal ABI (0.9-1.3) was unable to detect PAD. ROC showed ABI at 1.005 has sensitivity 64.71% (95% CI 0.48- 0.79) and specificity 61.7% (95% CI 0.53-0.69) and TBI at 0.6 has sensitivity 82.35% (95% CI 0.66-0.92) & specificity 92% (95% CI 0.87-0.96). Utilizing Cohen's Kappa, the reliability of ABI with respect to CTA showed fair agreement (K = 0.225, p = 0.001), whereas the reliability of TBI with respect to CTA showed substantial agreement (K = 0.759, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: ABI < 0.9 detects PAD reliably, but presence of PAD in patients with ABI > 9.0 including the normal of ABI (0.9-1.3) can be confirmed with TBI, which correlated strongly with CTA. TBI is also non-inferior for PAD detection, when ABI < 0.9. TBI and not ABI can be utilized for initial assessment of PAD in subjects with T2D.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Baseline renal dysfunction predicts mortality in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). However, it remains controversial whether renal insufficiency in PHPT is due to disease severity alone or other risk factors. This study aimed to explore the association of clinico-biochemical variables with renal dysfunction [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/m2] in PHPT. METHODS: A total of 112 patients of PHPT were selected and divided into following subgroups: renal dysfunction (n = 28) and normal renal function (n = 84). Demographic characteristics, traditional risk factors, phenotypes of PHPT based on target organ involvement, and biochemical parameters were compared between these subgroups. RESULTS: Patient subgroups of PHPT with and without renal dysfunction had similar age, frequency of diabetes, and hypertension. Renal dysfunction was more prevalent in males (p < 0.05). Compared to normal renal function subgroup, individuals with renal dysfunction had higher serum levels of calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, intact parathormone (all p < 0.05), while having lower hemoglobin levels (p < 0.05) and higher nephrolithiasis rates (p < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis revealed that nephrolithiasis, serum calcium-phosphorous product (CaxP), parathormone levels were positively associated with baseline renal dysfunction (all p < 0.01). A baseline PTH > 456 pg/mL and CaxP > 30.0 mg2/dl2 could discriminate renal dysfunction from normal renal function with sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 74.5% and 92.6% and 74.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Renal dysfunction was associated with presence of nephrolithiasis, elevated serum CaxP and PTH levels in our cohort with predominantly symptomatic PHPT, indicating an association with the underlying disease itself. Serum CaxP may additionally be appraised during risk assessment in PHPT.
