Barriers to health care access and utilization among aged indigents under the Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty Programme (LEAP): the perspective of users and service providers in north-western Ghana.

AIM: This article draws on the poverty and access to health care framework to explore the barriers to access and utilization of primary health care among aged indigents under the Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty Programme (LEAP) in Ghana. BACKGROUND: Although many developing countries have made progress in extending primary health care to their populations following the Alma-Ata Declaration of 1978, the establishment of the Millennium Development Goals, and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), barriers remain pervasive, particularly among vulnerable population groups. Previous studies have hardly paid in-depth attention to this important indicator for measuring progress toward achieving SDG 3. METHODOLOGY: To this end, we conducted a case study of access to health care services and utilization among aged indigents enrolled on the LEAP programme in the Daffiama Bussie Issa District of the Upper West. We collected and analyzed qualitative data from indigents aged 65 years and above, health care providers, and staff of the LEAP and the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). FINDINGS: Our analysis found geographic inaccessibility of health care, high costs of drugs and related services, exclusion of essential services from NHIS benefits package, and irregular transfer of cash to negatively influence access and utilization of health care among aged LEAP beneficiaries in the district. In addition to the need to strengthen the economy, provide health infrastructure and human resources for health in rural areas, the government needs to review the beneficiaries' bimonthly stipends to reflect the daily minimum wage, eliminate the delay in payments, and review the benefits package of the NHIS to include essential services and medical devices commonly used by aged people. Yet implementing these recommendations has affordability implications that require innovation to mobilize additional resources and create the desired fiscal space and institutions that can sustainably implement universal coverage programmes such as the LEAP.

Contraceptive use among female head porters: implications for health policy and programming in Ghana.

Objective: Despite the growing literature on the barriers to contraceptives use among women, the perspective of female head porters has not been exhaustively researched. Using Bronfenbrenner's socio-ecological theory, we explore the factors that influence the contraceptive decision-making of migrant female head porters in the Kumasi Metropolis and the implications for health policy and planning. Methodology: A case study of female head porters in the Kumasi Metropolis was conducted. We employed a qualitative approach in the collection and analysis of the data. A combination of cluster, purposive, and convenience sampling procedures was used to select 48 migrant female head porters to participate in semi-structured in-depth interviews. The data collected were analyzed using the thematic analytical framework. Results: We found the main barriers to the uptake of contraception among the head porters to include high cost of contraceptives, perceived side effects associated with contraceptive use, and the disapproval of a male sexual partners. Conclusion: The findings indicate that head porters' contraceptive decision-making is largely influenced by their social and economic circumstances. To address these, we recommend a carefully tailored approach, starting with a free National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) enrollment policy for all head porters in the country. There is also the need for the Ghana Health Service, and NGOs in health to work together to create effective awareness among female head porters on the benefits and misconceptions of contraception by incorporating culturally appropriate education that would facilitate the adoption of positive attitudes towards contraception. Additionally, NGOs in health in collaboration with the health facilities should initiate a process that encourages joint reproductive health decision-making among partners which recognises the added value of men's participation. We argue that men's active participation in contraception decision-making could potentially address their scepticism towards uptake.