Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 133(2): 227-31, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16806647

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the frequency and correlates of non-adherence to follow-up among patients conservatively treated for CIN2-3. STUDY DESIGN: Study population comprised 1560 patients aged 25-64 years from a screening programme in northern Italy. The regional standard protocol was used as a reference. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio probability of a patient being lost to follow-up (no check-ups within 27 months of treatment) or incompletely followed-up (1-3 negative check-ups) versus having 4 negative check-ups. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-six patients (21%) were lost to follow-up, 678 (43%) were incompletely followed-up, 352 (23%) presented for 4 negative check-ups and 204 (13%) were diagnosed with persistent disease. The probability of no or incomplete follow-up was greater for patients who lived in the urban district, who were treated in private settings (versus screening centres), who exhibited a visibile squamocolumnar junction on pre-treatment colposcopy, who were treated with cold knife excision and local destructive therapy (versus loop diathermy excision), and whose surgical specimens had positive excision margins. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the reference protocol was poor. Factors involved in follow-up failures require greater clinical attention.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening , Treatment Refusal , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/therapy , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...