Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Development ; 150(23)2023 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37934130

ABSTRACT

The zinc-finger protein Zelda (Zld) is a key activator of zygotic transcription in early Drosophila embryos. Here, we study Zld-dependent regulation of the seven-striped pattern of the pair-rule gene even-skipped (eve). Individual stripes are regulated by discrete enhancers that respond to broadly distributed activators; stripe boundaries are formed by localized repressors encoded by the gap genes. The strongest effects of Zld are on stripes 2, 3 and 7, which are regulated by two enhancers in a 3.8 kb genomic fragment that includes the eve basal promoter. We show that Zld facilitates binding of the activator Bicoid and the gap repressors to this fragment, consistent with its proposed role as a pioneer protein. To test whether the effects of Zld are direct, we mutated all canonical Zld sites in the 3.8 kb fragment, which reduced expression but failed to phenocopy the abolishment of stripes caused by removing Zld in trans. We show that Zld also indirectly regulates the eve stripes by establishing specific gap gene expression boundaries, which provides the embryonic spacing required for proper stripe activation.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , Animals , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism
2.
Methods Mol Biol ; 2599: 241-254, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36427154

ABSTRACT

Transcription factor-enhancer binding events are among the most well-studied protein-DNA interactions, allowing researchers to determine mechanisms of transcriptional activation or repression during development. While large-scale ChIP-sequence datasets, together with computational predictions and chromatin accessibility data, yield information on potential transcription factor binding activities, reporter gene assays provide measurable information on whether these binding activities are functional in particular cell types during development. Here, we present a detailed protocol to examine enhancer activity in Drosophila embryos using cloning, transgenesis, and in situ hybridization.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation , Research Personnel , Animals , Humans , In Situ Hybridization , Transcriptional Activation , Drosophila , Transcription Factors
3.
Bioessays ; 44(4): e2100191, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35195290

ABSTRACT

In human languages, a palindrome reads the same forward as backward (e.g., 'madam'). In regulatory DNA, a palindrome is an inverted sequence repeat that allows a transcription factor to bind as a homodimer or as a heterodimer with another type of transcription factor. Regulatory palindromes are typically imperfect, that is, the repeated sequences differ in at least one base pair, but the functional significance of this asymmetry remains poorly understood. Here, we review the use of imperfect palindromes in Drosophila photoreceptor differentiation and mammalian steroid receptor signaling. Moreover, we discuss mechanistic explanations for the predominance of imperfect palindromes over perfect palindromes in these two gene regulatory contexts. Lastly, we propose to elucidate whether specific imperfectly palindromic variants have specific regulatory functions in steroid receptor signaling and whether such variants can help predict transcriptional outcomes as well as the response of individual patients to drug treatments.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation , Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid , Animals , Base Sequence , Humans , Mammals , Transcription Factors/genetics
4.
Elife ; 72018 10 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30298815

ABSTRACT

The ancient mechanisms that caused developmental gene regulatory networks to diversify among distantly related taxa are not well understood. Here we use ancestral protein reconstruction, biochemical experiments, and developmental assays of transgenic animals carrying reconstructed ancestral genes to investigate how the transcription factor Bicoid (Bcd) evolved its central role in anterior-posterior patterning in flies. We show that most of Bcd's derived functions are attributable to evolutionary changes within its homeodomain (HD) during a phylogenetic interval >140 million years ago. A single substitution from this period (Q50K) accounts almost entirely for the evolution of Bcd's derived DNA specificity in vitro. In transgenic embryos expressing the reconstructed ancestral HD, however, Q50K confers activation of only a few of Bcd's transcriptional targets and yields a very partial rescue of anterior development. Adding a second historical substitution (M54R) confers regulation of additional Bcd targets and further rescues anterior development. These results indicate that two epistatically interacting mutations played a major role in the evolution of Bcd's controlling regulatory role in early development. They also show how ancestral sequence reconstruction can be combined with in vivo characterization of transgenic animals to illuminate the historical mechanisms of developmental evolution.


Subject(s)
Animals, Genetically Modified/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Evolution, Molecular , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Trans-Activators/genetics , Animals , Body Patterning/genetics , Drosophila Proteins , Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/genetics , Gene Regulatory Networks/genetics , Mutation , Phylogeny
5.
Genes Dev ; 32(9-10): 723-736, 2018 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29764918

ABSTRACT

The K50 (lysine at amino acid position 50) homeodomain (HD) protein Orthodenticle (Otd) is critical for anterior patterning and brain and eye development in most metazoans. In Drosophila melanogaster, another K50HD protein, Bicoid (Bcd), has evolved to replace Otd's ancestral function in embryo patterning. Bcd is distributed as a long-range maternal gradient and activates transcription of a large number of target genes, including otd Otd and Bcd bind similar DNA sequences in vitro, but how their transcriptional activities are integrated to pattern anterior regions of the embryo is unknown. Here we define three major classes of enhancers that are differentially sensitive to binding and transcriptional activation by Bcd and Otd. Class 1 enhancers are initially activated by Bcd, and activation is transferred to Otd via a feed-forward relay (FFR) that involves sequential binding of the two proteins to the same DNA motif. Class 2 enhancers are activated by Bcd and maintained by an Otd-independent mechanism. Class 3 enhancers are never bound by Bcd, but Otd binds and activates them in a second wave of zygotic transcription. The specific activities of enhancers in each class are mediated by DNA motif variants preferentially bound by Bcd or Otd and the presence or absence of sites for cofactors that interact with these proteins. Our results define specific patterning roles for Bcd and Otd and provide mechanisms for coordinating the precise timing of gene expression patterns during embryonic development.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Trans-Activators/genetics , Trans-Activators/metabolism , Amino Acid Motifs , Animals , Body Patterning/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Embryonic Development/drug effects , Embryonic Development/genetics , Enhancer Elements, Genetic/genetics , Protein Binding
6.
Dev Biol ; 360(2): 391-402, 2011 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22019301

ABSTRACT

In the Drosophila eye the retinal determination (RD) network controls both tissue specification and cell proliferation. Mutations in network members result in severe reductions in the size of the eye primordium and the transformation of the eye field into head cuticle. The zinc-finger transcription factor Teashirt (Tsh) plays a role in promoting cell proliferation in the anterior most portions of the eye field as well as in inducing ectopic eye formation in forced expression assays. Tiptop (Tio) is a recently discovered paralog of Tsh. It is distributed in an identical pattern to Tsh within the retina and can also promote ectopic eye development. In a previous study we demonstrated that Tio can induce ectopic eye formation in a broader range of cell populations than Tsh and is also a more potent inducer of cell proliferation. Here we have focused on understanding the molecular and biochemical basis that underlies these differences. The two paralogs are structurally similar but differ in one significant aspect: Tsh contains three zinc finger motifs while Tio has four such domains. We used a series of deletion and chimeric proteins to identify the zinc finger domains that are selectively used for either promoting cell proliferation or inducing eye formation. Our results indicate that for both proteins the second zinc finger is essential to the proper functioning of the protein while the remaining zinc finger domains appear to contribute but are not absolutely required. Interestingly, these domains antagonize each other to balance the overall activity of the protein. This appears to be a novel internal mechanism for regulating the activity of a transcription factor. We also demonstrate that both Tsh and Tio bind to C-terminal Binding Protein (CtBP) and that this interaction is important for promoting both cell proliferation and eye development. And finally we report that the physical interaction that has been described for Tsh and Homothorax (Hth) do not occur through the zinc finger domains.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Alcohol Oxidoreductases/genetics , Alcohol Oxidoreductases/metabolism , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Cell Proliferation , Cells, Cultured , Compound Eye, Arthropod/growth & development , Compound Eye, Arthropod/metabolism , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Molecular Sequence Data , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transfection , Zinc Fingers
7.
Curr Biol ; 21(14): R542-3, 2011 Jul 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21783031

ABSTRACT

The sequences of some gene regulatory elements diverge considerably, even between closely related species. A detailed analysis of the fast-evolving sparkling enhancer in Drosophila now identifies key compensatory mechanisms and 'grammar' elements that are critical for maintaining functional integrity.


Subject(s)
DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/growth & development , Drosophila/genetics , Evolution, Molecular , Eye Proteins/genetics , Animals
8.
Evol Dev ; 13(1): 58-71, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21210943

ABSTRACT

The retinal determination (RD) network in Drosophila comprises 14 known nuclear proteins that include DNA-binding proteins, transcriptional coactivators, kinases, and phosphatases. The composition of the network varies considerably throughout the animal kingdom, with the network in several basal insects having fewer members and with vertebrates having potentially significantly higher numbers of RD genes. One important contributing factor for the variation in gene number within the network is gene duplication. For example, 10 members of the RD network in Drosophila are derived from duplication events. Here we present an analysis of the coding regions of the five pairs of duplicate genes from within the RD network of several different Drosophila species. We demonstrate that there is differential selection across the coding regions of all RD genes. Additionally, some of the most significant differences in ratios of non-silent-to-silent site substitutions (d(N)/d(S)) between paralog pairs are found within regions that have no ascribed function. Previous structure/function analyses of several duplicate genes have identified areas within one gene that contain novel activities when compared with its paralog. The evolutionary analysis presented here identifies these same areas in the paralogs as being under high levels of relaxed selection. We suggest that sequence divergence between paralogs and selection signatures can be used as a reasonable predictor of functional changes in rapidly evolving motifs.


Subject(s)
Compound Eye, Arthropod/growth & development , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/growth & development , Drosophila/genetics , Evolution, Molecular , Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid , Amino Acid Substitution , Animals , Compound Eye, Arthropod/metabolism , Drosophila/classification , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Gene Duplication , Gene Regulatory Networks , Genes, Insect , Genetic Variation , Phylogeny , Selection, Genetic
9.
Dev Dyn ; 238(9): 2202-10, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19347955

ABSTRACT

In Drosophila, the retinal determination network comprises a set of nuclear factors whose loss-of-function phenotypes often include the complete or near total elimination of the developing eye. These genes also share the ability of being able to induce ectopic eye formation when forcibly expressed in nonretinal tissues such as the antennae, legs, halteres, wings, and genitals. However, it appears that the ability to redirect and transform tissue fates is limited; not all tissues and cell populations can be forced into adopting an eye fate. In this report, we demonstrate that ectopic eye formation by teashirt and its paralog tiptop, a potential new eye specification gene, is restricted to the developing antennae. Of interest, tiptop appears to be a more effective inducer of retinal formation than teashirt. A genetic screen for interacting proteins failed to identify paralog-specific relationships suggesting that the differences between these two genes may be attributed instead to structural differences between the duplicates. We also demonstrate that in addition to being expressed in coincident patterns within the developing eye, both paralogs are transcribed at very similar levels.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/physiology , Drosophila/embryology , Repressor Proteins/physiology , Transcription Factors/physiology , Animals , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Eye/embryology , Eye/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/physiology , Microscopy , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Retina/embryology , Retina/metabolism , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...