ABSTRACT
During the investigation of the degradation products of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) using ion mobility spectrometry (IMS), 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 2,4-dichlorophenol (DCP) were found to have IMS responses which overlapped those of the TNT degradation products. It was observed that the Cl(-) reactant ion chemistry, often used for explosives analysis, was not always successful in resolving peak overlap of analytes and interferents. It is shown here that resolution of the analytes and interferences can sometimes be achieved using only air for the formation of reactant ions, at other times through the use of Br(-) as an alternative to Cl(-) for producing reactant ions, and also through the promotion of adduct stability by lowering the IMS temperature.
ABSTRACT
The efficiency of chloride reactant ion formation, when chlorinated hydrocarbon reagent chemicals were added to the ionization region of an ion mobility spectrometer, corresponded to the electron attachment rate constant of the chemical. The chemicals investigated here included chloromethane, dichlormethane, trichloromethane, tetrachloromethane and chlorobenzene, with tetrachloromethane producing the greatest amount of chloride reactant ions for the amount of chemical added. Reagent chemicals with smaller electron attachment rate constants required the addition of more chemical to reach functional reactant ion levels. The excess neutral reagent molecules clustered to the chloride reactant ions and reduced the effectiveness of abstracting a proton from 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT). The effect of clustering was different for each chemical. Tetrachloromethane, which had the least exothermic clustering reaction, had the most effective production of the (TNT-H)(-) product ion per mole of reagent chemical. Bromide and iodide ions were also investigated as potential reactant ions. Bromide was found to effectively produce the proton abstracted (TNT-H)(-) ion. Iodide, however, was not a strong enough base to form (TNT-H)(-) from TNT. There was no apparent transfer of an electron to TNT by chloride, bromide or iodide.
ABSTRACT
Three models of alpha-track detector (ATD) Rn monitors were exposed in Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Rn chambers to obtain estimates of precision and bias for the National Residential Radon Survey (NRRS). Exposures in this study ranged from 37 to 740 Bq y m-3 (1 to 20 pCi y L-1), plus blanks. These exposures correspond to the range expected in most U.S. residences. All detectors were purchased through a Rn mitigation firm to assure that the vendors did not give special attention to the ATDs used in this study. Ten ATDs of each model were studied at 12 exposures. The mean and standard deviation of the reported values for each model were calculated and compared with the continuously monitored chamber concentrations to determine the bias and precision at each exposure. Results of this analysis were discussed with the vendors, who took corrective actions. Changes in track counting procedures and calibrations improved detector performance. Readings of one detector were adjusted based on a regression of the monitored values on the reported values.
