ABSTRACT
The management of pT1a-bN0M0 breast cancer remains an area of controversy. Data from 714 patients classified as having pT1a-bN0M0 breast cancer and treated, from 1999 to 2004 in the Languedoc-Roussillon France, were analyzed. The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status analyses were centralized. The objective of this study was to describe the prognosis of pT1a-bN0M0 breast cancer according to HER2 distribution and hormonal status. The median follow-up was 6.4 years. Ten-year overall survival was 94%. HER2 overexpression was observed in 6.1% of the patients. The 10-year prognosis of patients with HER2-positive tumors was worse than that of those with HER2-negative (disease-free survival 73% vs. 89%, P < 0.0001). Tumor size (T1a/T1b) was not a relevant prognostic factor. The co-expression of HER2 with hormonal receptors (HR) was associated with high recurrence at 10 years. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, the most relevant prognostic factor for this population was HER2 amplification. In multivariate analysis, patients with HER2-positive tumors had higher risk of mortality (HR, 3.89; 95% CI, 1.58-9.56). In pT1a-bN0M0 breast cancers, HER2 amplification or overexpression is a risk factor for recurrence. In HER2-positive breast cancers, HR expression is associated with a poor prognosis despite the hormone therapy. For this population, a personalized management may be required.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Disease-Free Survival , Female , France , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Prognosis , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Risk Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To determine whether inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) reduce the incidence of renal dysfunction when compared to other antihypertensive treatments in patients with essential hypertension and no pre-existent renal disease. METHODS: The search strategy used the Cochrane Library, Medline, previous meta-analyses, and journal reviews. The selection criteria included randomized, controlled trials of antihypertensive drugs that compared a RAS inhibitor with another treatment in essential hypertension. Studies that specifically enrolled only patients with diabetes or renal disease were not included. The quality assessment and data extraction of studies were performed by two independent reviewers. Effects on dichotomous renal outcome (serum creatinine (SCreat) higher than a prespecified value, doubling of SCreat or end-stage renal disease) and secondary continuous marker of renal outcome (change in SCreat) were calculated using Peto's method. RESULTS: 33,240 patients met the inclusion criteria for studies with a dichotomous outcome and 10,634 patients for studies with a continuous outcome. The mean follow-up was 42 ± 13 months. Patients randomized to RAS inhibitors did not show a significant reduction in the risk of developing renal dysfunction as compared to other antihypertensive strategies (odds ratio = 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.25; P = 0.54). There was no significant difference in change of SCreat between groups (mean difference = 0.0005 mg/dl; 95% CI -0.0068 to 0.0077 mg/dl; P = 0.91). CONCLUSION: In patients with essential hypertension and no pre-existent renal disease, prevention of renal dysfunction is not significantly different with RAS inhibitors when compared to other antihypertensive agents.
Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Hypertension/drug therapy , Renal Insufficiency/prevention & control , Renin-Angiotensin System/drug effects , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Creatinine/blood , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/prevention & control , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
Determining early surrogate markers of long-term graft outcome is important for optimal medical management. In order to identify such markers, we used clinical information from a cross-validated French database (Données Informatisées et VAlidées en Transplantation) of 2169 kidney transplant recipients to construct a composite score 1 year after transplantation. This Kidney Transplant Failure Score took into account a series of eight accepted pre- and post-transplant risk factors of graft loss, and was subsequently evaluated for its ability to predict graft failure at 8 years. This algorithm outperformed the traditional surrogates of serum creatinine and the estimated graft filtration rate, with an area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve of 0.78. Validation on an independent database of 317 graft recipients had the same predictive capacity. Our algorithm was also able to stratify patients into two groups according to their risk: a high-risk group of 81 patients with 25% graft failure and a low-risk group of 236 patients with an 8% failure rate. Thus, although this clinical composite score predicts long-term graft survival, it needs validation in different patient groups throughout the world.
