ABSTRACT
Introduction: Ventricular arrhythmias are often seen in association with structural heart disease. However, approximately a tenth of affected patients have apparently normal hearts, where such arrhythmias typically occur in young patients, are sometimes inherited and can occasionally lead to sudden cardiac death (SCD). Over the past two decades, increased understanding of the underlying pathophysiology resulted in improved targeted pharmacological therapy.Areas covered: This article reviews current knowledge regarding drug therapy for inherited arrhythmia syndromes (Brugada, early repolarization, long QT and short QT syndromes, and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia), and acquired arrhythmias (idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, short-coupled torsade de pointes, outflow tract ventricular tachycardia, idiopathic left, papillary muscle and annular ventricular tachycardias).Expert opinion: In inherited arrhythmia syndromes, appropriate clinical and genetic diagnoses followed by proper selection and dosing of antiarrhythmic drugs are of utmost importance to prevent SCD, most often without the need of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. In acquired arrhythmias, appropriate pharmacotherapy in selected patients can also provide symptomatic relief and avoid the need for invasive therapy. Further research is needed to develop novel antiarrhythmic drugs or targeted therapy to increase efficacy and limit side effects.
Subject(s)
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/drug therapy , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/genetics , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/pathology , Brugada Syndrome/drug therapy , Brugada Syndrome/pathology , Genetic Association Studies , Humans , Long QT Syndrome/drug therapy , Long QT Syndrome/pathology , Quinidine/therapeutic use , Tachycardia, Ventricular/drug therapy , Tachycardia, Ventricular/pathologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Cardiologists are among the health professionals that are most exposed to ionizing radiation, but there is no study comparing the level of exposure of physicians during different electrophysiology procedures. We aimed to measure and compare cardiologists' exposure to radiation during different electrophysiology procedures. METHODS: The study population comprised all electrophysiology procedures performed over a 6-month period in a large referral centre. The endpoint was operator radiation exposure, assessed using a personal electronic dosimeter located on the operator's left arm. RESULTS: In total, 150 electrophysiology procedures were analyzed. Compared with electrophysiology studies (reference category), physician radiation exposure was 3-fold greater during ablation of atrial fibrillation, 9-fold greater during ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT)/atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVNT), and 10-fold greater during ablation of atrial flutter (p < 0.001). Physician exposure was mainly related to X-ray time (R2 = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed significant differences in cardiologists' exposure to ionizing radiation depending on the type of electrophysiology procedure. Atrial flutter and AVNRT/AVNT ablations are the procedures in which operators are most exposed to ionizing radiation.
Subject(s)
Cardiologists , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac , Occupational Exposure , Radiation Exposure , France , Humans , Radiometry , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Cardiologists are among the health professionals that are most exposed to ionizing radiation, but there is no recent study quantifying overexposure of physicians during cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) procedures compared to 'classical' implantation of pacemakers (PMs) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). We aimed to measure and compare operator exposure to radiation during implantation of PM and ICD with or without CRT. The study population comprised all PMs and ICDs implanted in a large referral centre over a six months period. The endpoint was operator radiation exposure, assessed using a personal electronic dosimeter located on operator's chest. In total, 169 PM/ICD implantations were analysed, 19 of which included CRT. Compared with 'classical' implantation, cardiologist radiation exposure was 9-fold greater during CRT procedures (p < 0.001). Physician exposure was related to dose-area product (R2 = 0.21 during 'classical' implantations and R2 = 0.57 during CRT procedures). Our study shows that cardiologists' exposure to radiation during CRT implantation was 9-fold greater than during procedures without CRT.
