Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
3.
J Glaucoma ; 30(5): e259-e261, 2021 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33675339

ABSTRACT

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is commonly treated with amphetamines as first line therapy. Rare case reports have shown amphetamines are associated with open angle glaucoma. We report a rare case of a 14-year-old male who presented with bilateral acute angle closure presumed to be related to his use of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (Vyvanse). The patient's medication was discontinued which resulted in complete resolution of angle closure.


Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Stimulants , Glaucoma, Open-Angle , Adolescent , Central Nervous System Stimulants/adverse effects , Child , Dextroamphetamine/adverse effects , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate/adverse effects , Male , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Glaucoma ; 30(3): e47-e49, 2021 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33273280

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted ophthalmology practices significantly. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Center for Disease Control guidelines suggest mandatory masking of patients and physicians during outpatient visits. We have recently become aware of a mask-induced phenomenon, whereby the intraocular pressure (IOP) as measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is artificially elevated due to mechanical interference from the mask. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 37-year-old male with a history of primary open-angle glaucoma on triple therapy presented for a routine visit. CLINICAL FINDINGS: When measuring IOP by GAT the right eye measured 16 mm Hg, but the left eye measured 20 mm Hg. The patient's mask was noted to be touching the base of the sensor rod on the tonometer. This patient's IOP was falsely elevated due to the lateral edge of his mask touching the base of the applanation tonometer, changing the relationship between the bi-prism tip and the weighted balance below, and eliminating the weighted balance from the pressure measuring mechanism. The patient's mask was adjusted to ensure there was no touch and repeat measurement showed an IOP of 16 mm Hg in the left eye. CONCLUSION: Recognizing mask-induced alteration in IOP is essential as it could lead to unnecessary escalation of treatment. We recommend flattening the area of mask protrusion during applanation and ensuring that the sensor arm remains clear of the mask while the tonometer tip approaches the cornea, especially at the moment the mires become visible during corneal contact.


Subject(s)
Artifacts , COVID-19/epidemiology , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/physiopathology , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Masks , Respiration, Artificial/instrumentation , Tonometry, Ocular/methods , Adult , COVID-19/therapy , Comorbidity , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/diagnosis , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/epidemiology , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...