Improving access to pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prescribing in a primary care setting.

Although emtricitabine-tenofovir was approved for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in 2012, use by persons at risk of acquiring HIV has been limited. Because many primary care providers lacked familiarity and comfort prescribing PrEP, at our institution PrEP prescribing was concentrated among the infectious disease specialists, effectively limiting access. This project sought to increase the number of patients receiving new prescriptions for PrEP. The interventions targeted primary care providers (including internal medicine and family medicine), and were designed to increase the number of unique providers offering PrEP to their patients. The overall strategy was to expand the clinical scope of practice for primary care providers through education and provision of detailed care templates in the electronic health record. These initiatives were implemented through a series of informal Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, then generalised throughout the medical system. To evaluate the success of the project, we queried the electronic medical record for all new prescriptions for PrEP, with provider name and specialty, for all outpatients 18 years of age and older from 2012 through 2020. In 2015, prior to the intervention, only 78 patients received new prescriptions for PrEP at our institution, and only 38% (30 of 78) of these were from primary care clinicians. After the intervention, the number of patients receiving PrEP increased to 190 in 2019, with 85% (162 of 190) prescribed by primary care providers. In addition, the number of primary care providers making a new prescription for PrEP increased from 20 in 2015 to 73 in 2019. We conclude that targeted clinical education, combined with electronic health record templates, was associated with a significant increase in PrEP prescribing.

Spinal IgG4-Related Hypertrophic Pachymeningitis with Spinal Cord Compression: Case Report and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Back pain is a leading reason for patients to seek medical attention. Although musculoskeletal causes are common, patients can also present with rarer etiologies. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 50-year-old man presented with 2 months of isolated upper back pain initially suspected to be secondary to overuse muscular strain. During the next 3 months, his pain worsened, and he developed lower extremity dysesthesia and subjective weakness, despite normal neurological examination findings. Nonrevealing laboratory workup included normal muscle enzymes, C-reactive protein, urinalysis, and human leukocyte antigen B27. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a normal brain but a hypointense C7-T5 epidural mass, prompting a neurosurgical recommendation for laminectomy with evacuation of the suspected hematoma. His symptoms fully and promptly resolved after a 5-day course of prednisone 40 mg. When his symptoms recurred within 2 months, he underwent T4-T5 laminectomy with biopsy of a mass confluent with the dura mater. Initial pathological examination revealed fibrotic tissue of unclear etiology with polyclonal lymphoid infiltrate but no malignant cells, vasculitis, or granulomas. After months of recurrent, steroid-responsive symptoms, he presented to the rheumatology clinic. Repeat spinal magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated progression of epidural thickening with suspected spinal cord compression. Previous biopsy samples were then immunostained for IgG4, revealing focally dense IgG4-positive plasma cells, up to 29 cells per high power field, consistent with spinal IgG4-related hypertrophic pachymeningitis. He began rituximab therapy with a prednisone taper and demonstrated symptomatic and neurologic improvement with successful withdrawal from corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, the present case represents the 12th reported case of spinal IgG4-related hypertrophic pachymeningitis. An early diagnosis and treatment could prevent progression to permanent neurological impairment and functional disability.

Diagnostic accuracy of administrative data algorithms in the diagnosis of osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Administrative health care data are frequently used to study disease burden and treatment outcomes in many conditions including osteoarthritis (OA). OA is a chronic condition with significant disease burden affecting over 27 million adults in the US. There are few studies examining the performance of administrative data algorithms to diagnose OA. The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review of administrative data algorithms for OA diagnosis; and, to evaluate the diagnostic characteristics of algorithms based on restrictiveness and reference standards. METHODS: Two reviewers independently screened English-language articles published in Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases that used administrative data to identify OA cases. Each algorithm was classified as restrictive or less restrictive based on number and type of administrative codes required to satisfy the case definition. We recorded sensitivity and specificity of algorithms and calculated positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and positive predictive value (PPV) based on assumed OA prevalence of 0.1, 0.25, and 0.50. RESULTS: The search identified 7 studies that used 13 algorithms. Of these 13 algorithms, 5 were classified as restrictive and 8 as less restrictive. Restrictive algorithms had lower median sensitivity and higher median specificity compared to less restrictive algorithms when reference standards were self-report and American college of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. The algorithms compared to reference standard of physician diagnosis had higher sensitivity and specificity than those compared to self-reported diagnosis or ACR criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Restrictive algorithms are more specific for OA diagnosis and can be used to identify cases when false positives have higher costs e.g. interventional studies. Less restrictive algorithms are more sensitive and suited for studies that attempt to identify all cases e.g. screening programs.

Is there an association between whole-body pain with osteoarthritis-related knee pain, pain catastrophizing, and mental health?

BACKGROUND: Greater levels of self-reported pain, pain catastrophizing, and depression have been shown to be associated with persistent pain and functional limitation after surgeries such as TKA. It would be useful for clinicians to be able to measure these factors efficiently. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) What is the association of whole-body pain with osteoarthritis (OA)-related knee pain, function, pain catastrophizing, and mental health? (2) What is the sensitivity and specificity for different cutoffs for body pain diagram region categories in relation to pain catastrophizing? METHODS: Patients (n = 267) with knee OA undergoing elective TKA at one academic center and two community orthopaedic centers were enrolled before surgery in a prospective cohort study. Questionnaires included the WOMAC Pain and Function Scales, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Mental Health Inventory-5 (MHI-5), and a pain body diagram. The diagram documents pain in 19 anatomic areas. Based on the distribution of the anatomic areas, we established six different body regions. Our analyses excluded the index (surgically treated) knee. Linear regression was used to evaluate the association between the total number of nonindex painful sites on the whole-body pain diagram and measures of OA-related pain and function, mental health, and pain catastrophizing. Generalized linear regression was used to evaluate the association between the number of painful nonindex body regions (categorized as 0; 1-2; or 3-6) with our measures of interest. All models were adjusted for age, sex, and number of comorbid conditions. The cohort included 63% females and the mean age was 66 years (SD, 9 years). With removal of the index knee, the median pain diagram score was 2 (25(th), 75(th) percentiles, 1, 4) with a range of 0 to 15. The median number of painful body regions was 2 (25(th), 75(th) percentiles, 1, 3). RESULTS: After adjusting for age, sex, and number of comorbid conditions, we found modest associations between painful body region categories and mean scores for WOMAC physical function (r = 0.22, p < 0.001), WOMAC pain (r = 0.20, p = 0.001), MHI-5 (r = -0.31, p < 0.001), and PCS (r = 0.27, p < 0.001). A nonindex body pain region score greater than 0 had 100% (95% CI, 75%-100%) sensitivity for a pain catastrophizing score greater than 30 but a specificity of just 23% (95% CI, 18%-29%) . A score of 3 or greater had greater specificity (73%; 95% CI, 66%-79%) but lower sensitivity (53%; 95% CI, 27%-78%). CONCLUSIONS: We found modest associations between the number of painful sites on a whole-body pain diagram and the number of painful body regions and measures of OA-related pain, function, pain catastrophizing, and mental health. Patients with higher self-reported body pain region scores might benefit from further evaluation for depression and pain catastrophizing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in hospitalized patients with systemic sclerosis: higher mortality than patients with lupus and rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma) patients have an increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), possibly mediated through inflammatory and fibrotic mechanisms affecting the macrovasculature and microvasculature. We utilized the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample to assess the frequency of and mortality risk associated with ASCVD among hospitalized SSc patients. METHODS: We examined the frequency and mortality associated with primary diagnoses and procedures related to ASCVD among adult SSc patients using data from 1993 to 2007. Using multivariate logistic regression (controlling for age, sex, nonelective admission, and modified Charlson Comorbidity Index), we compared the odds of death among hospitalized SSc patients with ASCVD to those with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as well as to a control group that excluded patients with connective tissue diseases. RESULTS: A total of 308,452 hospitalizations of SSc patients were included, of which 5.4% were associated with a primary ASCVD diagnosis or procedure. ASCVD-related SSc hospitalizations were more likely to result in death compared with non-ASCVD SSc hospitalizations (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.1-1.4). Multivariate analyses showed that ASCVD-related SSc hospitalizations were more likely to result in death than similar hospitalizations of SLE (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.8), RA (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.9-2.8), and control patients (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.8) with ASCVD. CONCLUSIONS: SSc patients with ASCVD have higher in-hospital mortality than comparable groups of SLE and RA patients with ASCVD. Further research to elucidate the specific mechanisms underlying ASCVD in SSc is necessary.

Pegloticase and the patient with treatment-failure gout.

Gout is an inflammatory arthritis characterized by sudden, painful inflammation. Gout can affect any joint in an asymmetric distribution. Gouty attacks may be isolated or can be followed by years of recurrent flares. Over time, elevated serum urate levels and tophaceous deposits can lead to deformity and disability from underlying bony erosion. The concept of 'treatment-failure gout' describes a unique population that has been either unable to tolerate allopurinol or who have not experienced normalization of serum urate levels on allopurinol. It is estimated that approximately 1-1.5% of the estimated 3-8 million people with gout in the USA have treatment-failure gout. Pegloticase is an US FDA-approved intravenous medication that is a mammalian recombinant uricase conjugated to monomethoxy polyethylene glycol. Two recent Phase III trials have found pegloticase to be effective in the management of treatment-failure gout. These studies also highlight safety concerns regarding the drug's immunogenicity.

Female genital mutilation: what every American dermatologist needs to know.

Female genital mutilation (FGM) has become more common in the United States with increased immigration to the United States of individuals from areas where the practice is endemic. Although the root causes of FGM may be multiple, the practice is banned in the United States on all women under age 18 and is increasingly being outlawed by individual state legislatures. American dermatologists should expect to see a growing number of patients having undergone FGM who may present with complications ranging from keloids and epidermal cysts to clitoral neuromas and abscess formation. While treatment of such complications is often elusive and unsuccessful, recognition of the practice may prevent future patient abuse and death. The eradication of FGM will require the concerted efforts of many individuals, both within and outside of the health care field, with dermatologists poised to play a crucial role in diagnosis and management in the near future.