ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess the confidence of deploying Role 1 Medical Officers (MOs) in the use of parenteral analgesia, to collate opinion as to whether analgesia training for Role 1 MOs is fit for purpose and to explore options for future analgesic approaches at Role 1. METHODS: A survey distributed to Role 1 doctors prior to deployment to Afghanistan. RESULTS: Areas of expressed concern included the use of ketamine and a lack of experience of intraosseous drug administration. Qualitative data collected included anecdotal experiences with analgesia administration which provides evidence to support a change in training. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors have the capability to provide good analgesic care but lack the confidence and experience to do it effectively. Improved analgesia training is required for deploying Role 1 MOs.
Subject(s)
Analgesia/methods , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Military Medicine/methods , Pain Management/methods , Pain/diagnosis , Afghan Campaign 2001- , Clinical Competence , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Surveys and Questionnaires , United StatesABSTRACT
In response to increasing awareness of the need to improve Post Graduate Medical Officers training in the use of analgesics when on Operations and exercises, a new "Pain Day" format has been realised and included in the Post Graduate Medical Officers Course. This article discusses the format of the Pain Day; gives evidence of the feedback received; explores areas where further training may be required and suggests mechanisms through which improved training could be provided throughout the armed forces medical community.