ABSTRACT
PRCIS: Of 611 individuals seen at referral clinic visits following community screenings, 76% were diagnosed with ≤1 eye condition needing treatment, generating a total of $213,110 in collections for the institution over 2.5 years. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes and revenue generation of community-based eye screenings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Individuals aged 50 years and above screened at community sites in Baltimore, MD, with abnormal ophthalmic findings were referred for one free-of-charge definitive eye examination at the Wilmer Eye Institute. Diagnoses, treatment, and billing information were abstracted from electronic medical records of patients subsequently seen at Wilmer from January 1, 2016, to July 31, 2018. RESULTS: A total of 611 individuals attended 3696 encounters at Wilmer during this time period. Most patients were female (60.3%) and African American (83.7%). At the screening event, 82.9% reported difficulty seeing when not wearing corrective eyewear, although only 49.8% reported having visited an eye doctor within the last 2 years. The majority (60.2%) reported having Medicare/Medicaid coverage, and 8.1% reported being uninsured. At the definitive eye examination after the screening, 75.5% of patients were diagnosed with ≥1 eye condition, most commonly cataract (30.3%), suspicion of glaucoma (24.9%), manifest glaucoma (11.9%), diabetic retinopathy (5.4%), and ocular hypertension (2.6%). Overall, 430 (70.4%) individuals required treatment including surgery (n=106), intravitreal injections (n=14), laser procedures (n=9), and medications (n=48). A total of $213,110 was collected for visits and procedures after the initial referral visit during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: A large community-based vision screening program in Baltimore was able to identify ocular conditions requiring treatment in underserved older adults and connect them to eyecare. Our findings also highlight that this model simultaneously generates new revenue streams for the institution organizing the community screenings.
Subject(s)
Glaucoma , Ocular Hypertension , Vision Screening , Aged , Female , Glaucoma/diagnosis , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Male , Medicare , Ocular Hypertension/diagnosis , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Purpose: Recent innovations in mobile technology for the measurement of vision present a valuable opportunity to measure visual function in non-clinical settings, such as in the home and in field-based surveys. This study evaluated agreement between a tablet-based measurement of distance and near acuity and contrast sensitivity as compared to gold-standard clinical tests.Methods: Participants aged ≥55 years recruited from a tertiary eye clinic underwent testing with three tablet-based and corresponding gold-standard clinical measures (ETDRS distance acuity, Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity, and MNRead near acuity). Correlation and agreement between tablet-based and clinical tests were assessed.Results: A total of 82 participants with a mean age of 69.1 (SD = 7.6) years, and majority female (67.1%) and white (64.6%), were enrolled in this study. The mean (SD) difference between the tests (gold-standard - tablet) was -0.04 (0.08) logMAR for distance acuity, -0.11 (0.13) log units for contrast sensitivity, and -0.09 (0.12) logMAR for near acuity. 95% limits of agreement for distance acuity (-0.21, 0.12 logMAR), near acuity (-0.34, 0.14 logMAR), and contrast sensitivity (-0.36, 0.14 logCS) were also determined. The correlation between tablet-based and gold-standard tests was strongest for distance acuity (r = 0.78), followed by contrast sensitivity (r = 0.75), and near acuity (r = 0.67). The agreement between the standard and tablet-based methods did not appear to be dependent on the level of vision.Conclusions: This study demonstrates the agreement of tablet-based and gold-standard tests of visual function in older adults. These findings have important implications for future population vision health surveillance and research.
