Nontumor related risk score: A new tool to improve prediction of prognosis after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Prognostic stratification of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis based solely on tumor-related factors has only moderate discriminatory ability. We hypothesized that the inclusion of nontumor related factors can improve prediction of long-term prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis. METHODS: Nontumor related laboratory markers were assessed utilizing a training cohort from 2 U.S. institutions (n = 1,205). Factors independently associated with prognosis were used to develop a nontumor related prognostic score. The discriminatory ability, assessed by Harrell's C-statistics (C-index) and net reclassification improvement, was validated and compared with 3 commonly used tumor-related clinical risk scores: Fong clinical risk scores, m-clinical risk scores, and Genetic and Morphological Evaluation (GAME) score in an external validation cohort from 5 Asian (n = 1,307) and 3 European (n = 1,058) institutions. The discriminatory ability of nontumor related prognostic score combined with each of these 3 tumor-related prognostic scores was also estimated. RESULTS: Alkaline phosphatase (hazard ratio 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.84), albumin (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.89), and mean corpuscular volume (hazard ratio 19.0, per log unit; 95% confidence interval, 4.79-75.0) were each independently associated with increased risk of death after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (all P < .05). In turn, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, and mean corpuscular volume were combined to form a nontumor related prognostic score (2.942 × mean corpuscular volume + 0.399 × alkaline phosphatase-0.339 × albumin-12) × 10 (median, 16; range, 1-30). The nontumor related prognostic score had good-to-modest discriminatory ability in the external cohort (C-index = 0.58), which was comparable to the 3 established tumor-related prognostic scores (C-index: Fong clinical risk scores, 0.53, m-clinical risk scores, 0.55, GAME, 0.58). The addition of the nontumor related prognostic score to the tumor-related prognostic scores enhanced the discriminatory ability in the entire study cohort (C-index: nontumor related score+Fong, 0.60, nontumor related score+m-clinical risk scores, 0.61, nontumor related score+GAME, 0.64), as well reclassification improvement (42.5, 42.7%, and 21.2%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Nontumor related prognostic information may help improve the prognostic stratification of patients after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis. The nontumor related prognostic score may be combined with tumor-related prognostic tools to enhance prognostic stratification of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

Surgical Resection Is Preferred in Selected Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis.

INTRODUCTION: Sorafenib is the standard care for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT), though it offers limited survival. This study was designed to compare clinical outcomes between liver resection (surgery) and transarterial chemoembolization plus radiotherapy (TACE-RT) as the initial treatment modality for resectable treatment-naïve solitary HCC combined with subsegmental (Vp1), segmental (Vp2), and lobar (Vp3) PVTT. METHODS: From the institutional HCC registry, we identified 116 patients diagnosed with resectable treatment-naïve HCC with Vp1-Vp3 PVTT based on radiologic images who received surgery (n = 44) or TACE-RT (n = 72) as a primary treatment between 2010 and 2015. A propensity score matching (PSM) model was created. RESULTS: The TACE-RT group had a higher tumor burden (tumor size, extent, and markers) than the surgery group. Cumulative patient survival curve in the surgery group was significantly higher than that in the TACE-RT group before and after PSM. Liver function was relatively well preserved in the surgery group compared with the TACE-RT group. TACE-RT group, male, increased alkaline phosphatase, and increased platelet count were predisposing factors for patient death in resectable treatment-naïve solitary HCC with PVTT. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that surgery is considered as an initial treatment in selectively resectable treatment-naïve solitary HCC with Vp1-Vp3 PVTT.

Can pretransplant TIPS be harmful in liver transplantation? A propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt has been established as an effective treatment for complicated portal hypertension. This retrospective study investigated the effect of pretransplant transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement on intraoperative graft hemodynamics and surgical outcomes after liver transplantation. METHODS: Of 1,081 patients who underwent liver transplantation between January 2007 and June 2017 at Cleveland Clinic (OH, USA), 130 patients had transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement before liver transplant. We performed a 1:2 propensity score matching to compare intraoperative graft hemodynamics and surgical outcomes between the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt group (n = 130) and the no-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt group (n = 260). RESULTS: The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt did not increase operative time, the volume of blood transfusion, duration of hospital stay, or complication rates. Graft and patient survivals were similar between the groups. Mean intraoperative cardiac output and graft portal flow in the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt group were greater than in the no-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt group (P = .03 and P = .003, respectively). In multivariate analysis, male sex, younger age, low platelet count, absence of portal vein thrombosis, and pretransplant transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement were independently associated with increased portal flow volume (P < or = 0.03 each). Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malposition was observed in 17 patients (13.1%). The 1-year patient survival was 70.6% with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malposition and 92.0% without transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malposition (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that pretransplant transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement increases graft portal flow but does not compromise surgical outcomes after liver transplantation. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malposition, however, is not uncommon and may increase the complexity of transplantation.

Impact of Extra-anatomical Hepatic Artery Reconstruction During Living Donor Liver Transplantation on Biliary Complications and Graft and Patient Survival.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to analyze the feasibility of extra-anatomical hepatic artery (HA) reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: Patients who underwent their first living donor LT at our center between January 2008 and December 2017 were reviewed. HA reconstruction was classified as anatomical or extra-anatomical reconstruction (EAR). We compared the background characteristics and posttransplantation outcomes, including complications, biliary complications, graft survival, and overall survival. The potential risk factors for bile leakage were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, while risk factors for biliary stricture-free survival, graft survival, and overall survival were analyzed using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Among 800 patients, 35 (4.4%) underwent EAR, of whom 7 (7/35, 20.0%) experienced HA complications after the initial anatomical reconstruction and required EAR during reoperation. Patients who underwent EAR (n = 2/35, 5.7%) had a similar rate of HA complications compared with those who underwent anatomical reconstruction (n = 46/772, 5.9%, P = 0.699). EAR was a significant risk factor for bile leakage (odds ratio [OR], 4.167; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.928-9.006; P < 0.001) along with multiple bile ducts (OR, 1.606; 95% CI, 1.022-2.526; P = 0.040) and hepaticojejunostomy (OR, 4.108; 95% CI, 2.190-7.707; P < 0.001). However, EAR had no statistical relationship to biliary stricture-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.602; 95% CI, 0.982-2.613; P = 0.059), graft survival (HR, 1.745; 95% CI, 0.741-4.109; P = 0.203), or overall survival (HR, 1.405; 95% CI, 0.786-2.513; P = 0.251). HA complications were associated with poor biliary stricture-free survival (HR, 2.060; 95% CI, 1.329-3.193; P = 0.001), graft survival (HR, 5.549; 95% CI, 2.883-10.681; P < 0.001), and overall survival (HR, 1.958; 95% CI, 1.195-3.206; P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Extra-anatomical HA reconstruction during living donor LT was not a risk factor for biliary stricture, graft failure, or overall survival.

The prognosis and treatment outcomes of patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation (LT) is performed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but recurrent HCC after LT remains a problem. We retrospectively reviewed the data from 63 patients with recurrent HCC who underwent LT at a single institution between September 1996 and March 2011 to determine the prognosis of patients with recurrent HCC after LT. A survival analysis was performed with the preoperative data, histological findings, patterns of recurrence, and treatment methods. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with early (<1 yr) cancer-related death. The independent prognostic factors, according to the multivariate analysis, were recurrence within six months (hazards ratio [HR] = 4.557, p = 0.021) and initial multiple-organ involvement (HR = 5.494, p = 0.015). The survival rates of patients differed according to the treatment type. The combined treatment with local and systemic treatment resulted in increased survival even in patients with HCC recurrences involving multiple organs.