Common and distinct correlates of construction and elaboration of episodic-autobiographical memory: An ALE meta-analysis.

The recollection of episodic-autobiographical memories (EAMs) entails a complex temporal dynamic, from initial "construction" to subsequent "elaboration" of memories. While there is consensus that EAM retrieval involves a distributed network of brain regions, it is still largely debated which regions specifically contribute to EAM construction and/or elaboration. To clarify this issue, we conducted an Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analysis based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic-Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method. We found common recruitment of the left hippocampus and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) during both phases. Additionally, EAM construction led to activations in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, left angular gyrus (AG), right hippocampus, and precuneus, while the right inferior frontal gyrus was activated by EAM elaboration. Although most of these regions are distributed over the default mode network, the current findings highlight a differential contribution according to early (midline regions, left/right hippocampus, and left AG) versus later (left hippocampus, and PCC) recollection. Overall, these findings contribute to clarify the neural correlates that support the temporal dynamics of EAM recollection.

Individuals with highly superior autobiographical memory do not show enhanced creative thinking.

Creative ideas are thought to result from flexible recombination of concepts from memory. A growing number of behavioural and neuroscientific studies provide evidence of a link between episodic memory and divergent thinking; however, little is known about the potential contributions of autobiographical memory to creative ideation. To provide a novel perspective on this issue, we assessed measures of divergent and convergent creative thinking in a cohort (n = 14) of rare individuals showing Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory (HSAM). The HSAM cohort completed memory tasks in addition to a battery of creativity measures, including the Alternative Uses Task, Consequences Task and Remote Associates Task. We performed statistical analyses to establish whether there were any significant differences between HSAM and controls (n = 28) across these measures. Although HSAM participants were superior in the recall of autobiographical events compared to controls, we observed no overall difference between the groups in relation to the creativity measures. These findings suggest that the constructive episodic processes relevant to creative thinking are not enhanced in individuals with HSAM, perhaps because they are compulsively and narrowly focused on consolidation and retrieval of autobiographical events.

Remembering a Virtual Museum Tour: Viewing Time, Memory Reactivation, and Memory Distortion.

A variety of evidence demonstrates that memory is a reconstructive process prone to errors and distortions. However, the complex relationship between memory encoding, strength of memory reactivation, and the likelihood of reporting true or false memories has yet to be ascertained. We address this issue in a setting that mimics a real-life experience: We asked participants to take a virtual museum tour in which they freely explored artworks included in the exhibit, while we measured the participants' spontaneous viewing time of each explored artwork. In a following memory reactivation phase, participants were presented again with explored artworks (reactivated targets), followed by novel artworks not belonging to the same exhibit (activated lures). For each of these objects, participants provided a reliving rating that indexed the strength of memory reactivation. In the final memory recognition phase, participants underwent an old/new memory task, involving reactivated vs. baseline (i.e., non-reactivated) targets, and activated and baseline lures. The results showed that those targets that were spontaneously viewed for a longer amount of time were more frequently correctly recognized. This pattern was particularly true for reactivated targets associated with greater memory strength (a higher reliving rating). Paradoxically, however, lures that were presented after targets associated with higher reliving ratings in the reactivation phase were more often erroneously recognized as artworks encountered during the tour. This latter finding indicates that memory intrusions, irrespective of the viewing time, are more likely to take place and be incorporated into true memories when the strength of target memory is higher.

Altered Hippocampal Resting-state Functional Connectivity in Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory.

Individuals with Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory (HSAM) provide the opportunity to investigate the neurobiological substrates of enhanced memory performance. While previous studies started to assess the neural correlates of memory retrieval in HSAM, here we assessed for the first time the intrinsic connectivity of a core memory region, the hippocampus, with the whole brain, in 8 HSAM subjects (HSAMs) and 21 controls during resting-state functional neuroimaging. We found in HSAMs vs. controls disrupted hippocampal resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) with high-level control regions belonging to the saliency network (the anterior cingulate cortex and the left and right insulae), and to the ventral fronto-parietal attentional network (the temporo-parietal junction and the inferior frontal gyrus), also involved with salience detection. Conversely, HSAMs showed enhanced hippocampal rsFC with sensory regions along the fusiform gyrus and the inferior temporal cortex. This altered pattern of hippocampal rsFC might be interpreted as a reduced capability of HSAMs to discriminate and select salient information, with a subsequent increase in the probability to encode and consolidate sensory information irrespective of their task-relevancy. Ultimately, these findings provide evidence that HSAM might be paradoxically enabled by an altered hippocampal rsFC that bypasses regions involved with salience detection in favor of specialized sensory regions.