Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
CJEM ; 14(1): 36-9, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22417956

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) sepsis guidelines created by the CAEP Critical Care Practice Committee (C4) and published in the Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine (CJEM) form the most definitive publication on Canadian emergency department (ED) sepsis care to date. Our intention was to identify which of the care items in this document are specifically necessary in the ED and then to provide these items in a tiered checklist that can be used by any Canadian ED practitioner. METHODS: Practice points from the CJEM sepsis publication were identified to create a practice point list. Members of C4 then used a Delphi technique consensus process over May to October 2009 via e-mail to create a tiered checklist of sepsis care items that can or could be completed in a Canadian ED when caring for the septic shock patient. This checklist was then assessed for use by a survey of ED practitioners from varying backgrounds (rural ED, community ED, tertiary ED) from July to October 2010. RESULTS: Twenty sepsis care items were identified in the CAEP sepsis guidelines. Fifteen items were felt to be necessary for ED care. Two levels of checklists were then created that can be used in a Canadian ED. Most ED physicians in community and tertiary care centres could complete all parts of the level I sepsis checklist. Rural centres often struggle with the ability to obtain lactate values and central venous access. Many items of the level II sepsis checklist could not be completed outside the tertiary care centre ED. CONCLUSION: Sepsis care continues to be an integral and major part of the ED domain. Practice points for sepsis care that require specialized monitoring and invasive techniques are often limited to larger tertiary care EDs and, although heavily emphasized by many medical bodies, cannot be reasonably expected in all centres. When the resources of a centre limit patient care, transfer may be required.


Subject(s)
Checklist/standards , Emergency Medicine/standards , Emergency Service, Hospital/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Sepsis/therapy , Total Quality Management , Canada , Delphi Technique , Female , Humans , Male , Sepsis/diagnosis , Societies, Medical , Treatment Outcome
2.
Resuscitation ; 81(8): 1037-9, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20605670

ABSTRACT

We report the first case of amitriptyline toxicity treated with intravenous fat emulsion (IFE). Toxicity was manifested as vasopressor-refractory haemodynamic instability despite standard therapy. Our patient recovered with no adverse effects noted.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/poisoning , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Drug Overdose/therapy , Fat Emulsions, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Heart Arrest/chemically induced , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Adult , Drug Overdose/etiology , Drug Overdose/physiopathology , Fat Emulsions, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Arrest/physiopathology , Heart Arrest/therapy , Hemodynamics/physiology , Humans , Male
3.
CJEM ; 10(5): 443-59, 2008 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18826733

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Optimal management of severe sepsis in the ED has evolved rapidly. The purpose of these guidelines is to review key management principles for Canadian emergency physicians, utilizing an evidence-based grading system. METHODS: Key areas in the management of septic patents were determined by members of the CAEP Critical Care Interest Group (C4). Members of C4 were assigned a question to be answered after literature review, based on the Oxford grading system. After completion, each section underwent a secondary review by another member of C4. A tertiary review was conducted by additional external experts, and modifications were determined by consensus. Grading was based on peer-reviewed publications only, and where evidence was insufficient to address an important topic, a "practice point" was provided based on group opinion. RESULTS: The project was initiated in 2005 and completed in December 2007. Key areas which were reviewed include the definition of sepsis, the use of invasive procedures, fluid resuscitation, vasopressor/inotrope use, the importance of culture acquisitionin the ED, antimicrobial therapy and source control. Other areas reviewed included the use of corticosteroids, activated protein C, transfusions and mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSION: Early sepsis management in the ED is paramount for optimal patient outcomes. The CAEP Critical Care Interest Group Sepsis Position Statement provides a framework to improve the ED care of this patient population.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/standards , Sepsis/therapy , Canada , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans
6.
CJEM ; 4(4): 302-3, 2002 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17609000
7.
CJEM ; 4(1): 55, 2002 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17637152
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...