A survey of perceptions of exposure to new technology in residents and practicing ophthalmologists.

BACKGROUND: Incorporation of the rapid advances in ophthalmologic surgical and diagnostic techniques inherent in the field poses a challenge to residency training programs. This study investigates exposure to new technologies during residency and perception of its impact on practice patterns. METHODS: Ophthalmology residents at various training levels and practicing ophthalmologists who had completed their training were invited to participate in a survey study assessing exposure to various technologies in residency and in practice. Data collection occurred from December 2022 to June 2023. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: The study received 132 unique responses, including 63 ophthalmology residents and 69 practicing ophthalmologists. 65.2% (n = 45) of practicing ophthalmologists and 47.6% (n = 30) of current residents reported discussion/training on newly developed products on the market (e.g. premium IOLS, MIGS), was "minimally discussed but not emphasized" or "not discussed at all" in residency. 55.1% (n = 38) of practicing ophthalmologists reported that exposure to new technologies during residency did influence types of technologies employed during practice. The majority resident physicians reported enjoying being trained on newer technology and feeling more prepared for future changes in the field (95.2%, n = 60) and felt that having industry partnerships in residency enhances education and training (90.5%, n = 57). CONCLUSIONS: Considering how to maximize exposure to newer technologies/devices during residency training is important, and may contribute to training more confident, adaptable surgeons, who are more likely to critically consider new technologies and adopt promising ones into their future clinical practice.

Improving Patient Safety and Patient-Provider Communication.

PURPOSE: Many hospitalized patients experience barriers to effective patient-provider communication that can negatively impact their care. These barriers include difficulty physically accessing the nurse call system, communicating about pain and other needs, or both. For many patients, these barriers are a result of their admitting condition and not of an underlying chronic disability. Speech-language pathologists have begun to address patients' short-term communication needs with an array of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) strategies. METHOD: This study used a between-groups experimental design to evaluate the impact of providing patients with AAC systems so that they could summon help and communicate with their nurses. The study examined patients' and nurses' perceptions of the patients' ability to summon help and effectively communicate with caregivers. RESULTS: Patients who could summon their nurses and effectively communicate-with or without AAC-had significantly more favorable perceptions than those who could not. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that AAC can be successfully used in acute care settings to help patients overcome access and communication barriers. Working with other members of the health care team is essential to building a "culture of communication" in acute care settings. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9990962.

Temporal coactivation of abdominal muscles during dynamic stability exercises.

The purpose of this study was to determine abdominal muscle temporal responses to a leg-loading exercise protocol and if differences exist between those able and unable to minimize lumbar-pelvic motion during this protocol. The focus was a supine bilateral leg-loading task that incorporated a slide (level 4) or no slide (level 5). Thirty-three healthy subjects (mean age 24 years) completed the task while surface electromyograms (EMG) from 5 abdominal muscle sites were recorded. Subjects were assigned to stable or unstable groups based on their ability to minimize lumbar-pelvic motion. After time and amplitude normalization, electromyography waveforms were entered into a pattern recognition procedure and scores for each principal pattern were calculated. Four principal patterns explained 90% of variance in the waveform data, with these principal patterns capturing the mean pattern, the relative amplitude change during the leg-extension phase, and subtle changes in shape throughout the exercise. Significant interactions (p < 0.05) were found for principal patterns; 1, 2, and 4 scores; and significant main (p < 0.05) effects for principal pattern 3 scores. These results illustrate temporal synchrony among the abdominal wall muscle activation during the bilateral leg-loading tasks; however, there was less variability in the activation patterns during the leg-lift and leg extension-phases for those who were able to minimize lumbar-pelvic motion compared to those who were unable to perform the task correctly. These results illustrate the need to focus on coordinated recruiting of the abdominal wall muscles in an organized manner and not simply increasing the intensity of activation for stabilization training.

Trunk muscle responses to demands of an exercise progression to improve dynamic spinal stability.

OBJECTIVES: To compare relative activation amplitudes among abdominal and trunk extensor muscle sites of healthy people performing a leg-loading exercise protocol aimed at progressively challenging spinal stability. DESIGN: A prospective, comparative, repeated-measures design. SETTING: Motion analysis research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen healthy male and female volunteers (mean age +/- standard deviation, 23.8+/-3.4y). INTERVENTIONS: Subjects performed 5 progression levels in random order, while surface electromyograms were recorded from 5 abdominal and 2 back extensor muscle sites. Levels 2 through 5 were of interest because they included a leg-extension phase. The root mean square (RMS) amplitude during the leg-extension phase was calculated and normalized to maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) for each muscle. A 2-factor repeated-measures analysis of variance tested the muscle-by-level interactions and the 2 main effects for the abdominal and trunk extensor sites separately. Bonferroni adjustments were performed on significant results. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Normalized RMS (NRMS) amplitude for each muscle during the leg-extension phase. RESULTS: There were statistically significant muscle-by-level interactions (P<.05) for both abdominal and trunk extensor sites. The relative amplitudes increased for the abdominal muscles and erector spinae muscles among levels, except between levels 3 and 4. Significant differences were found among the abdominal muscle sites for the lower-level exercises (levels 2-4), but not for level 5. The highest NRMS amplitude was at level 5, that is, 40% of MVIC. CONCLUSIONS: The patterns of activation amplitudes differed among levels; therefore, this was not a simple progressive loading protocol because muscles responded in a nonuniform manner to the demands associated with the various levels of progression. Based on the results, the protocol met some of the objectives of dynamic stability protocols.