Pulsatile LH secretion and ovarian follicular wave emergence and growth in anestrous ewes.

The objective of this study was to determine if pulsatile LH secretion was needed for ovarian follicular wave emergence and growth in the anestrous ewe. In Experiment 1, ewes were either large or small (10 x 0.47 or 5 x 0.47 cm, respectively; n = 5/group) sc implants releasing estradiol-17 beta for 10 d (Day 0 = day of implant insertion), to suppress pulsed LH secretion, but not FSH secretion. Five sham-operated control ewes received no implants. In Experiment 2, 12 ewes received large estradiol-releasing implants for 12 d (Day 0 = day of implant insertion); six were given GnRH (200 ng IV) every 4 h for the last 6 d that the implants were in place (to reinitiate pulsed LH secretion) whereas six Control ewes were given saline. Ovarian ultrasonography and blood sampling were done daily; blood samples were also taken every 12 min for 6 h on Days 5 and 9, and on Days 6 and 12 of the treatment period in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. Treatment with estradiol blocked pulsatile LH secretion (P < 0.001). In Experiment 1, implant treatment halted follicular wave emergence between Days 2 and 10. In Experiment 2, follicular waves were suppressed during treatment with estradiol, but resumed following GnRH treatment. In both experiments, the range of peaks in serum FSH concentrations that preceded and triggered follicular wave emergence was almost the same as control ewes and those given estradiol implants alone or with GnRH; mean concentrations did not differ (P < 0.05). We concluded that some level of pulsatile LH secretion was required for the emergence of follicular waves that were triggered by peaks in serum FSH concentrations in the anestrous ewe.

Ovarian follicular dominance and the induction of daily follicular waves in the ewe.

Large antral follicles grow in waves in the ewe, and each wave is triggered by a peak in serum concentrations of FSH. The existence of follicular dominance in the ewe is unclear. The objective of experiment 1 was to determine if an endogenously driven follicular wave could emerge during the growth phase of a wave induced by injection of ovine FSH (oFSH). Cyclic ewes (n = 7) were given oFSH (two injections of 0.5 microg/kg; s.c.; 8 h apart) on 2 separate days equally spaced in the interval between the first two endogenously driven follicular waves of an estrous cycle. Injection of oFSH induced two follicular waves in the interval between the first two endogenously driven waves of the cycle. The second endogenously driven wave of the estrous cycle emerged in the midgrowth phase of a follicular wave induced by injection of oFSH and its day of emergence, and growth pattern did not differ from that of the equivalent wave in control ewes (emerging 5.4 +/- 0.2 and 4.8 +/- 0.5 days after ovulation, respectively; P > 0.05). Experiment 2 was designed to determine if emergence of follicular waves could be induced on a daily basis. Six anestrus ewes were given oFSH (two injections of 0.35 microg/kg; s.c.; 8 h apart) on each of 4 days, starting 24 h after the expected time of an endogenously driven FSH peak. Each injection of oFSH resulted in a discrete peak in serum FSH concentrations and the emergence of a new follicular wave. The present findings provide evidence for the lack of follicular dominance in the ewe.

Differential effects of various estradiol-17beta treatments on follicle-stimulating hormone peaks, luteinizing hormone pulses, basal gonadotropin concentrations, and antral follicle and luteal development in cyclic ewes.

In a previous study, 10-day estradiol implant treatment truncated the FSH peaks that precede follicular waves in sheep, but subsequent ovine FSH (oFSH) injection reinitiated wave emergence. The present study's objectives were to examine the effects of a 20-day estradiol and progesterone treatment on FSH peaks, follicle waves, and responsiveness to oFSH injection. Also, different estradiol doses were given to see whether a model that differentially suppressed FSH peaks, LH pulses, or basal gonadotropin secretion could be produced in order to study effects of these changes on follicular dynamics. Mean estradiol concentrations were 11.8 +/- 0.4 pg/ml, FSH peaks were truncated, wave emergence was halted, and the number of small follicles (2-3 mm in diameter) was reduced (P < 0.05) in cyclic ewes given estradiol and progesterone implants (experiment 1). On Day 15 of treatment, oFSH injection failed to induce wave emergence. With three different estradiol implant sizes (experiment 2), estradiol concentrations were 5.2, 19.0, 27.5, and 34.8 (+/-4.6) pg/ml in control and treated ewes, respectively. All estradiol treatments truncated FSH peaks, except those that created the highest estradiol concentrations. Experiment 2-treated ewes had significantly reduced mean and basal FSH concentrations and LH pulse amplitude and frequency. We concluded that 20-day estradiol treatment truncated FSH peaks, blocking wave emergence, and reduced the small-follicle pool, rendering the ovary unresponsive to oFSH injection in terms of wave emergence. Varying the steroid treatment created differential FSH peak regulation compared with other gonadotropin secretory parameters. This provides a useful model for future studies of the endocrine regulation of ovine antral follicular dynamics.

Suppression of follicle wave emergence in cyclic ewes by supraphysiologic concentrations of estradiol-17beta and induction with a physiologic dose of exogenous ovine follicle-stimulating hormone.

Follicle waves are preceded by follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) peaks in ewes. The purpose of the present study was to see whether estradiol implant treatment would block FSH peaks to create a model in which the effect of the timing and mode of FSH peaks could be studied by ovine FSH (oFSH) injection. In Experiment 1, 10 ewes received estradiol-17beta implants on Day 4 after ovulation (Day 0, day of ovulation); five ewes received large implants, and five ewes received small implants. Five control ewes received empty implants. In Experiment 2, 12 ewes received large implants on Day 4. On Day 9, six ewes received oFSH twice, 8 h apart (0.5 microg/kg; s.c.). Implants were left in place for 10 days in both experiments. In both studies, ovarian ultrasonography and blood sampling was done daily. In Experiment 1, estradiol concentrations were significantly higher in ewes with large implants (10.4 +/- 0.7 pg/ml) compared with controls (3.9 +/- 0.7 pg/ml) and ewes with small implants (5.4 +/- 0.7 pg/ml; P < 0.001). A significant reduction was found in mean FSH peak concentration (31%; P < 0.05) and FSH peak amplitude (45%; P < 0.05) in ewes with large implants compared with controls. Mean and basal FSH concentrations were unaffected by the large implants. The large implants halted follicle-wave emergence between Day 0 and 8 after implant insertion. The small follicle pool (2-3 mm in diameter) was unaffected by the large implants. When oFSH was injected into ewes with large implants, a follicle wave emerged 1.5 +/- 0.5 days after injection; however, in ewes given saline alone, a follicle wave emerged 4.8 +/- 0.8 days after injection (P < 0.01). We concluded that truncation of FSH peaks by estradiol implants prevented follicle-wave emergence, but injection of physiologic concentrations of oFSH reinitiated follicle-wave emergence.