Neuromuscular lordoscoliosis: an unusual response to post-operative halo-gravity traction.

PURPOSE: To report the results of prolonged post-operative halo-gravity traction in a patient in whom the surgery had to be interrupted unexpectedly and for whom subsequently specific clinical circumstances contraindicated completion of the surgical procedure. METHODS: The patient was a 15-year-old male with severe cervico-dorsolumbar lordoscoliosis who was being studied for associated diffuse axonal injury. He performed halo-gravity traction for 12 weeks. Subsequent surgical management consisted of occipito-lumbar posterior instrumented fusion. During the surgical approach, electrocardiographic changes with hemodynamic decompensation were detected that did not improve with anesthetic reanimation. The intervention was stopped, the surgical wound was closed, and the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU). It was decided that a revision surgery with the aim to continue with the previous strategy would imply a high risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Orthopedic management was decided upon consisting of continued halo-gravity traction with wheelchair modification at home, which was extended to a period of 12 months because of the good results obtained in terms of cervicothoracic realignment. Two years after halo-gravity discontinuation, clinical and radiographic occipito-cervical alignment was good and the patient conserved certain occipito-cervical range of motion and had the capacity of maintaining a horizontal gaze. CONCLUSION: We considered the outcome extraordinary and relevant in this complex and unusual patient. A longer follow-up will provide more data regarding the final outcome of this treatment.

Selective Fusion in Lenke 1 B/C: Before or After Menarche?

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, comparative study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the radiological behavior of the lumbar curve in selective fusions in premenarchal girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (Lenke 1 B/C). METHODS: A retrospective, comparative study was conducted. Selective fusion was performed in 21 patients younger than 18 years. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group A, after menarche (n = 12) and group B, before menarche (n = 9). Angles (preoperative, and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively) of the fused thoracic curves and the corresponding lumbar curves were measured and compared. For statistical analysis, the t test was used with a significance level of P < .05. RESULTS: Mean preoperative angle value of the proximal/main thoracic curve was 61° in group A and 57° in group B (P = .44), and 21° and 20°, respectively, in the first year postoperatively (P = .61). Mean preoperative angle value of the lumbar curve was 43° in group A and 42° in group B (P = .87), while at 1 year after surgery, this curve was 19° in both groups (P = 0.91), and at 2 years postoperatively, the curve was 16° in group A and 17° in group B (P = .75). CONCLUSIONS: Over a 2-year follow-up, we did not find significant radiological differences in lumbar curves between patients who underwent surgery before and after menarche.

Scoliosis in spinal muscular atrophy: is the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging necessary?

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of intraspinal alterations in scoliosis due to Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). METHODS: Cross-sectional, observational, descriptive study. Fifty-six patients with SMA diagnosis required surgical treatment due to scoliosis. INCLUSION CRITERIA: scoliosis/kyphoscoliosis > 50 degrees in the coronal plane, clinical characteristics of Spinal Muscular Atrophy, accurate diagnosis by means of molecular or genetic study. Prior to the spinal surgery, and to find related intraspinal alterations, MRI of the spine and posterior cranial fossa was performed. RESULTS: Forty females, 16 males, mean age 11 years (range 6-14 years). 94% of the patients had Spinal Muscular Atrophy type 2. The mean angle value was 81 degrees (range 53-122 degrees) in the coronal plane and 62 degrees (range 35-80 degrees) in the sagittal plane. The prevalence of intraspinal alterations was 1.78%. One patient with cervical hydromyelia and no neurological surgical procedure prior to the spinal deformity surgery was reported. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of preoperative planning and strategy of patients with scoliosis due to Spinal Muscular Atrophy, MRI may have not to be requested.

Inpatient versus outpatient halo-gravity traction in children with severe spinal deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, comparative study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the results, complications, and costs of preoperative halo-gravity traction in in- and outpatient settings. BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical management of severe spinal deformities remains complex and controversial. Preoperative halo-gravity traction results in a decreased need for aggressive surgical techniques, lower incidence of intraoperative neurologic complications, and improvement of nutritional parameters and preoperative cardiopulmonary function. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients younger than 18 years with kyphoscoliosis undergoing preoperative halo-gravity traction were divided into two groups: inpatients (n: 15) and outpatients (n: 14, home care or care at the Foundation). Traction time (weeks), traction weight (kg), radiographic curve correction, complications, and costs were compared. For statistical analysis, t test and odds ratio were calculated with a significance of p < 0.05. RESULTS: Mean traction time was 6 weeks for in- and 4 weeks for outpatients (p = 0.038). Initial traction weight was 6 kg in both groups, while final traction weight was 13 kg for in- and 15 kg for outpatients (p = 0.50). At the end of the traction period, coronal correction was 24° in in- and 28° in outpatients (p = 0.5), while sagittal correction was 27° and 29°, respectively (p = 0.80). Pin loosening was observed in 2 patients in each group, of whom 1 outpatient developed pin-site infection. In each group, one patient developed transient neurologic complications (odds ratio 1.091). Mean treatment cost per patient was 2.8-fold higher in inpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Considering complications and costs, our results show that preoperative halo-gravity traction in an outpatient setting is an option to be taken into account. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Grade III.