Impact of Cytological Sampling on EGFR Mutation Testing in Stage III-IV Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Objectives. There have been advances in the identification and understanding of molecular subsets of lung cancer, defined by specific oncogenic aberrations. A number of actionable genetic alterations have been identified, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. We aimed to establish the reasons why patients were not undergoing EGFR mutation testing at the time of histological diagnosis. Methods. The records of 70 patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung managed through a single multidisciplinary team at a single institution were reviewed. Data were collected on method of tumour sample collection, whether this was sent for EGFR testing, and the result. Results. Seventy patients were identified. In 21/25 (84%) cases, cytological sampling was sufficient for EGFR mutation analysis, compared with 40/45 (89%) cases with histological sampling. EGFR mutation testing was not carried out in 22/70 (31.4%) patients. There was insufficient tumour sample for EGFR testing in 9/22 (40.9%) patients. Other reasons for not testing included poor patient fitness and problems in the diagnostic pathway. Conclusions. In this series, cytological tumour sampling was not the predominant reason why cancers failed to have EGFR mutation status established.

Assessment of the feasibility of using transrectal ultrasound for postimplant dosimetry in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

A study was performed to establish whether transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-based postimplant dosimetry (PID) is both practically feasible and comparable to computed tomography (CT)-based PID, recommended in current published guidelines. In total, 22 patients treated consecutively at a single cancer center with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy for early-stage prostate cancer had a transrectal ultrasound performed immediately after implant (d0-TRUS) and computed tomography scan 30 days after implant (d30-CT). Postimplant dosimetry planning was performed on both image sets and the results were compared. The interobserver reproducibility of the transrectal ultrasound postimplant dosimetry planning technique was also assessed. It was noticed that there was no significant difference in mean prostate D90 (136.5Gy and 144.4Gy, p = 0.2197), V100 (86.4% and 89.1%, p = 0.1480) and V150 (52.0% and 47.8%, p = 0.1657) for d30-CT and d0-TRUS, respectively. Rectal doses were significantly higher for d0-TRUS than d30-CT. Urethral doses were available with d0-TRUS only. We have shown that d0-TRUS PID is a useful tool for assessing the quality of an implant after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy and is comparable to d30-CT PID. There are clear advantages to its use in terms of resource and time efficiency both for the clinical team and the patient.

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in South Wales: Are Exon 19 Deletions and L858R Different?

BACKGROUND/AIM: In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations L858R and exon 19 deletion (del19) predict response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Trials have suggested a differential response to the second-generation EGFR TKI afatinib in favour of del19. We investigated whether this differential response is observed in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective demographic, treatment and outcome data were collected on patients with: stage III/IV NSCLC and either del19 or L858R, receiving an EGFR TKI as first-line treatment. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between del19 (648 days, 95% confidence interval (CI)=461-835) and L858R (813 days, 95%CI=387-1,238), (p=0.616), or in duration of therapy between del19 (365 days, 95% CI=192-538) and L858 (428 days, 95% CI=263-593), (p=0.928). CONCLUSION: Patients with exon del19 did not have a significantly longer OS with first-generation TKIs.

Third-line Enzalutamide Following Docetaxel and Abiraterone in Metastatic Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: There are no published randomised trials on the efficacy of enzalutamide against metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after docetaxel and abiraterone. We evaluated the activity of third-line enzalutamide in men with mCRPC after docetaxel and abiraterone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival from the start of enzalutamide were compared according to response to abiraterone in men with mCRPC treated at a single cancer centre. RESULTS: Median PFS and OS for the whole 34-patient cohort from starting enzalutamide were 2.7 months (95% confidence interval=1.4-4.0 months) and 10.4 months (95% confidence interval=9.0-11.7 months). There was no significant difference in PFS and OS in patients according to prostate-specific antigen response to abiraterone (≥50% vs. <50%, ≤ or >6 months). CONCLUSION: In mCRPC, enzalutamide has modest activity after docetaxel and abiraterone. Response to previous abiraterone is not predictive of subsequent enzalutamide response.

What Predicts Minimal Response to Abiraterone in Metastatic Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer?

BACKGROUND: Several treatments have been shown to prolong survival in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC); the optimum sequencing of these is not established. We investigated methods of identifying patients with mCRPC unlikely to respond to abiraterone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried-out in 47 consecutive patients with mCRPC treated sequentially with androgen deprivation (LHRHa), bicalutamide, docetaxel then abiraterone. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival in patients treated with abiraterone was shorter in those with ≤18 months' response to LHRHa (118 vs. 279 days; p=0.018), bicalutamide non-responders (91 vs. 196 days; p=0.003) and patients with ≤6 months' response to docetaxel (102 vs. 294 days; p<0.001). The median overall survival was also shorter (348 vs. 815 days, p=0.016; 413 vs. 752 days, p=0.009; and 325 vs. 727 days, p<0.04, respectively). CONCLUSION: A response of ≤18 months' to LHRHa, non-response to bicalutamide and ≤6 months' response to docetaxel predicted poor response to abiraterone.

Lung cancer masquerading as breast cancer with carcinoma en cuirasse.

Metastases to the breast from lung cancer are rare. Carcinoma en cuirasse is an unusual form of metastatic cutaneous carcinoma, almost exclusively described as deposits secondary to breast carcinoma. A 63-year-old woman presented with dyspnoea. A CT scan demonstrated a pleural effusion, large pericardial effusion, mediastinal lymphadenopathy and right basal consolidation. Pleural fluid cytology and immunohistochemistry were consistent with a diagnosis of primary lung adenocarcinoma. The patient was treated with pemetrexed and carboplatin, resulting in stable disease. A year later, she developed bilateral breast masses and multiple painful erythematous subcutaneous nodules over her torso, clinically indistinguishable from carcinoma en cuirasse. A biopsy demonstrated these were deposits from metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung. The patient received docetaxel and carboplatin with initial good response. The painful lesions were subsequently treated with radiotherapy, which provided symptomatic relief. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only case of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma mimicking carcinoma en cuirasse.