ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To report childhood infection with Baylisascaris procyonis (raccoon round worm) manifesting as diffuse unilateral subacute neuroretinitis (DUSN) and choroidal infiltrates in association with neurologic disease (neural larva migrans). METHOD: Observational case series, one with eye manifestations of DUSN, the other with choroidal infiltrates, both with severe neurologic degeneration. RESULTS: Indirect immunofluorescence assays on serum and cerebrospinal fluid were positive for B. procyonis in one and serially positive and increasing in the other. Both children had a history of pica and raccoon exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Baylisascaris procyonis infection is associated with two cases of severe neurologic degeneration with ocular lesions: DUSN and choroidal infiltrates. Although B. procyonis is known to cause DUSN, these cases indicate that concomitant ocular migration may accompany neural larva migrans. These are the third and forth cases in the US literature of neural larva migrans due to B. procyonis with eye findings.
Subject(s)
Ascaridida Infections/parasitology , Ascaridoidea/isolation & purification , Choroid Diseases/parasitology , Eye Infections, Parasitic/parasitology , Larva Migrans/parasitology , Retinitis/parasitology , Acute Disease , Animals , Antibodies, Helminth/blood , Antibodies, Helminth/cerebrospinal fluid , Antigens, Helminth/immunology , Ascaridoidea/immunology , Child , Child, Preschool , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
Baylisascaris procyonis, the common raccoon roundworm, is a rare cause of devastating or fatal neural larva migrans in infants and young children. We describe the clinical features of two children from suburban Chicago who developed severe, nonfatal B. procyonis neural larva migrans. Despite treatment with albendazole and high dose corticosteroids, both patients are neurologically devastated. In many regions of North America, large populations of raccoons with high rates of endemic B. procyonis infection live in proximity to humans, which suggests that the risk of human infection is probably substantial. In the absence of effective treatment, prevention of infection remains the most important public health strategy.