Propofol Immersion As a Euthanasia Method for Adult Zebrafish (Danio Rerio).

The exponential rise of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) as a model organism in biomedical research has far outstripped our un- derstanding of basic husbandry and welfare for this species. As a case in point, here we investigate the efficacy and welfare impact of different euthanasia methods for zebrafish. Not only is a humane death central to welfare and the 3Rs, but stress during euthanasia can change scientific outcomes. However, the most frequently used methods of euthanasia have multiple shortcomings with regard to animal welfare and human safety. In this study, we propose the use of propofol for immersion euthanasia of adult zebrafish. Propofol has been known to rapidly induce anesthesia in many species, including zebrafish, but its efficacy as a euthanasia agent for zebrafish has not fully been explored. In this study, adult zebrafish were euthanized by immersion on one of 5 different preparations: ice bath, 250 ppm MS222, 600 ppm lidocaine hydrochloride, 100 ppm propofol, or 150 ppm propofol for 20 or 30 min. Display of aversive behaviors, time to loss of righting reflex, time to cessation of opercular movement, and time to recovery after transfer to clean tank water were assessed and recorded. Propofol at both concentrations induced loss of righting reflex and loss of opercular movement more quickly than did MS222 or lidocaine hydrochloride and caused no display of aversive behaviors as seen with ice bath or lidocaine exposure. However, fish exposed to propofol at either concentration for 20 min sometimes recovered, whereas a 30-min exposure was sufficient for euthanasia of all fish tested. These findings suggest that exposure to propofol for a duration of at least 30 min quickly and effectively euthanizes adult zebrafish without compromising end-of-life welfare.

A Validated Smartphone-based Electrocardiogram Reveals Severe Bradyarrhythmias during Immobilizing Restraint in Mice of Both Sexes and Four Strains.

Mouse handling and restraint affect behavior, physiology, and animal welfare, yet little information is available on how various mouse restraint methods affect cardiovascular parameters. We validated the use of a smartphone-based ECG sys- tem in mice by performing simultaneous smartphone and telemetry ECG recordings in conscious, restrained mice and in anesthetized mice. We observed that mice held in standard immobilizing restraint ("scruffing") experienced severe bradycardia. Mice of both sexes and 4 different strains (BALB/cJ, C57BL/6J, DBA/2J, and FVB/nJ) were restrained by 3 handlers using 3 different restraint methods: light restraint; 3-finger restraint, which creates a dorsal transverse fold of skin; and the standard immobilizing restraint, which creates a dorsal longitudinal fold of skin that results in a crease on the ventral neck. Regardless of the handler, immobilizing restraint, but not 3-finger restraint, produced severe bradycardia with irregular rhythm in all 4 strains and both sexes, with an average decrease in heart rate of 31%, or 211 bpm, and a maximal decrease of 79%, or 542 bpm. When evaluated using telemetry, immobilizing restraint produced severe arrhythmias such as junctional and ventricular escape rhythms, and second- and third-degree atrioventricular block. Sinus pauses were observed for an average of 4 min, but up to 6.8 min after release from immobilizing restraint. Atropine administration to C57BL/6J mice attenuated immobilizing restraint-induced bradycardia, supporting the hypothesis that pressure on cervical baroreceptors during stretching of the neck skin results in a vagally-mediated reflex bradycardia. Because of these profound cardiovascular effects, we recommend using the light or 3-finger restraint and avoiding or minimizing the use of immobilization restraint while handling mice.