The Role of Systemic Therapy in the Management of Stage I Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal treatment strategy for resected stage I large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung (LCNEC) remains unknown. In this analysis, we evaluate the impact of systemic chemotherapy on patients with stage I LCNEC who have undergone surgical resection. METHODS: The study population included patients who underwent surgical resection for LCNEC and had pathologic stage I disease. We compared overall survival between patients who underwent surgical resection alone and those who underwent surgical resection plus chemotherapy. Overall survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons were analyzed by using multivariable Cox models and propensity score-matched analyses. RESULTS: From 2004 to 2013, 1232 patients underwent surgical resection for stage I LCNEC in the National Cancer Database, including 957 patients (77.7%) who underwent surgical resection alone and 275 (22.3%) who received both surgery and systemic chemotherapy. Five-year survival was significantly improved in patients who received chemotherapy (64.5% versus 48.4% [hazard ratio =0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.68, p < 0.001]). Multivariable Cox modeling confirmed the survival benefit from chemotherapy for patients with resected stage I LCNEC (hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.68, p <0.0001). The survival benefit was further confirmed by propensity-matched analysis. In addition, older (age >70 years), comorbid white patients who underwent sublobar resections for tumors larger than 20 mm had worse survival outcomes. CONCLUSION: In this largest-reported retrospective study of patients with resected stage I LCNEC, survival was improved in patients who received chemotherapy in both stage IA and stage IB LCNEC.

Transmyocardial revascularization (TMR): current status and future directions.

PURPOSE: Cardiac surgeons are increasingly faced with a more complex patient who has developed a pattern of diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD), which is refractory to medical, percutaneous, and surgical interventions. This paper will review the clinical science surrounding transmyocardial revascularization (TMR) with an emphasis on the results from randomized controlled trials. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials which evaluated TMR used as sole therapy and when combined with coronary artery bypass grafting were reviewed. Pertinent basic science papers exploring TMR's possible mechanism of action along with future directions, including the synergism between TMR and cell-based therapies were reviewed. RESULTS: Two laser-based systems have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to deliver laser therapy to targeted areas of the left ventricle (LV) that cannot be revascularized using conventional methods: the holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser system (CryoLife, Inc., Kennesaw, GA) and the carbon dioxide (CO2) Heart Laser System (Novadaq Technologies Inc., (Mississauga, Canada). TMR can be performed either as a stand-alone procedure (sole therapy) or in conjunction with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in patients who would be incompletely revascularized by CABG alone. Societal practice guidelines have been established and are supportive of using TMR in the difficult population of patients with diffuse CAD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diffuse CAD have increased operative and long-term cardiac risks predicted by incomplete revascularization. The documented operative and long-term benefits associated with sole therapy and adjunctive TMR in randomized trials supports TMR's increased use in this difficult patient population.