"The Person Gets Lost in the Whole Process": Access to Physical Healthcare for Patients Hospitalized in a Psychiatric Hospital.

Background and Purpose: Persons living with mental illnesses have unmet physical healthcare needs, leading to premature death. When they attempt to access physical health services, they are faced with numerous barriers that lead to delays in care. Although mental health nurses are identified as being essential actors in helping persons with mental illnesses navigate the complexities of the healthcare system, they also engage in conduct that further stigmatizes them. To complicate matters more, mental health nurses themselves face stigmatization when they help their patients living with mental illnesses access physical healthcare services. The aim of the study was to explore mental health nurses' experiences of associative stigma when accessing physical health services for their patients. Methods: To achieve this aim, we used an interpretive phenomenology methodology and a theoretical framework rooted in Erving Goffman's notion of associative stigma. Specifically, we conducted six interviews with mental health nurses working at an urban multisite psychiatric hospital to elicit accounts of their experiences of associative stigma when seeking physical healthcare for their patients and the meanings they make of these. Results: The results presented in this article illustrate some of the mechanisms by which stigmatization toward persons living with mental illnesses and mental health nurses cause delays in physical healthcare accessibility. Implications for Practice: In our discussion, we highlight the implications of these results for the practice of nurses and propose two structural solutions to improve access to physical healthcare and reduce stigmatizing experiences.

Evaluations of postoperative transitions in care for older adults: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Most people having major surgery are over the age of 65. The transition out of hospital is a vulnerable time for older adults, particularly after major surgery. Research on postoperative transitions in care is growing, but it is not clear how postoperative transitions are being evaluated. The objective of this scoping review was to synthesize processes and outcomes used to evaluate postoperative transitions in care for older adults. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review that included articles evaluating a postoperative transition in care among adults aged > 65 having major elective surgery. We searched Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINHAL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from their respective inception dates to April 6, 2021. We also searched The World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov from their respective inception dates to April 6, 2021. Screening and data extraction was completed by reviewers in duplicate. Data relevant to study design and objective, intervention description, and process or outcome evaluations were extracted. Process evaluations were categorized using the Ideal Transitions in Care Framework, and outcome evaluations were categorized using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Triple Aim Framework. RESULTS: After screening titles and abstracts and full-text article review, we included 20 articles in our final synthesis. There was variability in the processes and outcomes used to evaluate postoperative transitions in care. The most common outcomes evaluated were health service utilization (n = 9), including readmission and Emergency Department visits, experiential outcomes (n = 9) and quality of life (n = 7). Process evaluations included evaluating the education provided to patients to promote self-management (n = 6), coordination of care among team members (n = 3) and outpatient follow-up (n = 3). Only two articles measured frailty, one article used theory to guide their evaluations and no articles engaged knowledge users. CONCLUSIONS: There is inconsistency in how postoperative transitions in care were evaluated. There is a need to use theories and to engage key stakeholders involved in postoperative transitions in care, including older adults and their caregivers, to identify the most appropriate approaches for developing and evaluating interventions to meaningfully improve care.