NLRP3 inhibition improves maternal hypertension, inflammation, and vascular dysfunction in response to placental ischemia.

Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy-specific hypertensive disorder with end-organ damage that presents after 20 wk of gestation. PE pathophysiology often includes vascular dysfunction and increased inflammation that continues to damage patient health even after PE resolves. Currently, there is no cure for PE beyond delivery of the fetal-placental unit. Previous clinical studies have identified elevated placental NLRP3 expression in patients with PE and suggest NLRP3 as a potential therapeutic target. In this study, we examined the effect of NLRP3 inhibition on PE pathophysiology in the reduced uterine perfusion pressure (RUPP) model rat using MCC950 (20 mg/kg/day) or esomeprazole (3.5 mg/kg/day). We hypothesized that increased NLRP3 in response to placental ischemia impairs anti-inflammatory IL-33 signaling to induce T-helper 17 cell (TH17) and cytolytic NK cell (cNK) activation, which is known to mediate oxidative stress and vascular dysfunction leading to maternal HTN and intrauterine growth restriction. RUPP rats had significantly higher placental NLRP3 expression, maternal blood pressure, fetal reabsorption rate, vascular resistance, oxidative stress, cNKs and TH17s, and decreased IL-33 compared with normal pregnant (NP) rats. NLRP3 inhibition, with either treatment, significantly reduced placental NLRP3 expression, maternal blood pressure, fetal reabsorption rates, vascular resistance, oxidative stress, cNK, and TH17 populations in RUPP rats. Based on our findings, NLRP3 inhibition reduces PE pathophysiology and esomeprazole may be a potential therapeutic for PE treatment.

Effect of less aggressive treatment on diabetic retinopathy severity scale scores: analyses of the RIDE and RISE open-label extension.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors associated with Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) changes with less frequent ranibizumab after induction therapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Post hoc analyses of RIDE/RISE and their open-label extension (OLE). Analyses included patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR)/diabetic macular oedema who completed the OLE. Comparisons were made between patients with improved/maintained (≥0 step decrease from OLE baseline (month 36) to month 48) versus worsened (≥1 step increase) DRSS during the OLE. DRSS changes over 12 months were compared between patients randomised to ranibizumab at RIDE/RISE baseline who improved to DRSS score ≤43 at OLE baseline (induced) versus those randomised to sham with DRSS score ≤43 at RIDE/RISE baseline (native). RESULTS: From OLE baseline to month 48, 72% (263/367) of patients improved/maintained DRSS scores. These patients had similar mean best-corrected visual acuity at RIDE/RISE (56.4 letters) and OLE baseline (68.6 letters) versus patients with worsened scores (58.2 and 70.8 letters). Patients who improved/maintained DRSS scores had similar mean central foveal thickness at RIDE/RISE (492 µm) and OLE baseline (196 µm) versus patients with worsened scores (441 and 167 µm). Patients who improved/maintained DRSS scores received a significantly higher (p<0.0001) mean number of pro re nata (PRN) injections (4.4) between OLE baseline and month 48 versus those with worsened scores (2.3). Patients with more severe DR at baseline who achieved mild-to-moderate non-proliferative DR (NPDR) induced by monthly ranibizumab injections were significantly more likely to worsen (p<0.0001) than those with mild-to-moderate NPDR at baseline randomised to sham injections (1.0-step versus 0.1-step worsening). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients improved/maintained DRSS scores with less-than-monthly PRN ranibizumab. Some minimum treatment/monitoring may be necessary to maintain improvements after induction therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT00473382/NCT00473330.

Impact of Delayed Time to Treatment on Visual Outcomes in Neovascular AMD: Data From the HARBOR Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To determine the potential impact on visual outcomes of delayed treatment initiation in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Post hoc analysis of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment-naïve patients with nAMD from HARBOR. Time to treatment was defined as first ranibizumab injection date minus screening date. Comparisons were made between the prompt (≤ 6 days) versus delayed (> 10 days) treatment groups. Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change over time, BCVA, number of ranibizumab injections, and proportion of 3-line gainers/losers. RESULTS: In HARBOR, more than 50% of patients received their first injection within 7 days of screening, with mean (median) time to treatment of 4.6 (5) and 15.9 (14) days for the prompt and delayed treatment groups, respectively. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) BCVA change from baseline to Month 24 was 9.1 (7.4-10.8) and 8.8 (6.7-10.8) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters in the prompt (n = 395) and delayed (n = 230) treatment groups, respectively. Mean (95% CI) total number of ranibizumab injections for the as-needed arms was 12.4 (11.6-13.3) and 11.4 (10.3-12.4) for the prompt and delayed treatment groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In HARBOR, time from screening to first ranibizumab injection did not seem to significantly affect mean BCVA change or number of injections. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:62-69.].