ABSTRACT
Small cell carcinoma of the prostate (PSCC) is a highly aggressive malignancy that often develops in patients previously treated with hormonal therapy for metastatic prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma. The TMPRSS2-ERG gene rearrangement is highly specific for prostate cancer and shared by PSCC; however, the role of androgen receptor (AR) gene alterations and interaction with TMPRSS2-ERG rearrangement are incompletely understood in PSCC. Sixty-one cases of PSCC were examined for AR gene copy number and TMPRSS2-ERG rearrangement by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and AR protein expression by immunohistochemistry. Of 61 cases of PSCC, 51% (31/61) demonstrated increased AR gene copy number (FISH+), 54% (33/61) were positive for TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion, and 38% (23/61) showed AR protein expression. Of the 31 AR FISH+ cases, 23 also showed TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion, and 16 expressed AR protein. Of the 33 cases with TMPRSS2-ERG fusion, 28 were AR FISH+ or expressed AR protein. Statistically significant correlations were observed between AR gene copy number or AR protein expression and TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion (P = 0.001 and P = 0.03, respectively). In summary, high AR gene copy number emerges during the development of PSCC, often in association with TMPRSS2-ERG rearrangement. This potential mechanism warrants further study. Improvement will come from understanding the biology of the disease and integrating new therapies into the treatment of this rare and aggressive tumor.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Small Cell/genetics , Gene Dosage , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Prostate/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Small Cell/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/analysis , Prostate/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Receptors, Androgen/analysisABSTRACT
Bladder cancer is associated with high recurrence and mortality rates. These tumors show vast heterogeneity reflected by diverse morphologic manifestations and various molecular alterations associated with these disease phenotypes. Biomarkers that prospectively evaluate disease aggressiveness, progression risk, probability of recurrence and overall prognosis would improve patient care. Integration of molecular markers with conventional pathologic staging of bladder cancers may refine clinical decision making for the selection of adjuvant and salvage therapy. In the past decade, numerous bladder cancer biomarkers have been identified, including various tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, growth factors, growth factor receptors, hormone receptors, proliferation and apoptosis markers, cell adhesion molecules, stromal factors, and oncoproteins. Recognition of two distinct pathways for urothelial carcinogenesis represents a major advance in the understanding and management of this disease. Nomograms for combining results from multiple biomarkers have been proposed to increase the accuracy of clinical predictions. The scope of this review is to summarize the major biomarker findings that may have translational and clinical implications.