ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance and safety of a radiation therapy positioning system (RealEye) based on tracking a radioactive marker (Tracer) implanted in patients with localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a single-arm multi-institutional trial in 20 patients. The iridium-192 ((192)Ir)-containing Tracer was implanted in the patient together with 4 standard gold seed fiducials. Patient prostate-related symptoms were evaluated with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire. Computed tomography (CT) was performed for treatment planning, during treatment, and after treatment to evaluate the migration stability of the Tracer. At 5 treatment sessions, cone beam CT was performed to test the positioning accuracy of the RealEye. RESULTS: The Tracer was successfully implanted in all patients. No device or procedure-related adverse events occurred. Changes in IPSS scores were limited. The difference between the mean change in Tracer-fiducial distance and the mean change in fiducial-fiducial distance was -0.39 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] upper boundary, -0.22 mm). The adjusted mean difference between Tracer position according to RealEye and the Tracer position on the CBCT for all patients was 1.34 mm (95% CI upper boundary, 1.41 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the Tracer is feasible and safe. Migration stability of the Tracer is good. Prostate patients can be positioned and monitored accurately by using RealEye.
Subject(s)
Fiducial Markers , Iridium Radioisotopes , Movement , Patient Positioning/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Gold , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radionuclide Imaging , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy, Image-Guided/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To prospectively investigate the influence of 3-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) before brachytherapy (BT) for low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) on urinary function and health-related quality of life (HRQL). METHODS: Between 2003 and 2008, 300 patients with PCa were treated with BT using (125)I stranded seeds, of whom 86 received 3-month NHT to downsize the prostate before treatment. Urinary complaints were measured on all occasions with the International Prostate Symptom Score (n = 134) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire PR25 (EORTC-QLQ-PR25 questionnaire; n = 118) and HRQL with the EORTC-QLQ-C30 (n = 120) questionnaire. RESULTS: Post-BT, urinary function became worse over the first 6 weeks and then improved steadily, but did not return to baseline levels at 1 year. At baseline, the NHT group reported worse urinary function compared with the non-NHT group (P < .01). However, the post-BT improvement of urinary function was better in the NHT group at 3 months (P < .05). Global HRQL, physical, role and social functioning decreased over the first 3 months (P < .05) post-BT but returned to baseline levels within 1 year. Emotional function steadily improved over the 1-year follow-up period (P < .001). The NHT group reported better global HRQL, social and emotional functioning 1 year post-BT compared with baseline (P < 05). All results were adjusted for comorbidity. This is a single-center study with a follow-up of 1 year, thereby potentially limiting the general applicability of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Three months of NHT before BT might positively influence urinary function and HRQL up to 1 year post-BT. Therefore, PCa patients should not be dissuaded from considering NHT followed by BT because of prostate size.
