Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Health Phys ; 112(4): 357-363, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28234695

ABSTRACT

Many dosimeter and instrument calibration sources, especially Cs irradiators permanently installed in facilities, are infrequently calibrated since their geometry is not subject to large variation, their mechanisms are simple, and their operation can be visibly error-free for decades. Only decay corrections are needed to know delivered doses at fixed locations once a thorough characterization of such facilities is completed. For one such Cs source, however, collected current values in a span of a few days were found to drop significantly. Malfunction of the internal positioning mechanisms through wear were found to be the cause. This paper suggests periodic source calibrations for the timely identification of source failures that could cause gross errors in dose delivery. In addition, a rigorous analysis of the magnitude of uncertainties and errors in dose delivery using a calibration source is included, which is based upon newly collected experimental data. This provides a technical basis for calibration procedures to ensure a given accuracy and precision of dose delivery.


Subject(s)
Calibration/standards , Cesium Radioisotopes/analysis , Cesium Radioisotopes/standards , Facility Design and Construction/standards , Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiometry/standards , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis/methods , Equipment Failure Analysis/standards , Michigan , Radiation Dosage , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Health Phys ; 112(3): 237-245, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28121723

ABSTRACT

Optically-stimulated luminescent dosimeters are capable of being interrogated multiple times post-irradiation. Each interrogation removes a fraction of the signal stored within the optically-stimulated luminescent dosimeter. This signal loss must be corrected to avoid systematic errors in estimating the average signal of a series of optically-stimulated luminescent dosimeter interrogations and requires a minimum number of consecutive readings to determine an average signal that is within a desired accuracy of the true signal with a desired statistical confidence. This paper establishes a technical basis for determining the required number of readings for a particular application of these dosimeters when using certain OSL dosimetry systems.


Subject(s)
Artifacts , Guidelines as Topic , Lighting/standards , Optical Devices/standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , Calibration/standards , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Lighting/instrumentation , Radiation Dosage , Reproducibility of Results , Semiconductors , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...