ABSTRACT
AIMS: Tens of millions of people worldwide use opiates but little is known about their potential role in causing cardiovascular diseases. We aimed to study the association of long-term opiate use with cardiovascular mortality and whether this association is independent of the known risk factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the population-based Golestan Cohort Study-50 045 Iranian participants, 40-75 years, 58% women-we used Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (HRs, 95% CIs) for the association of opiate use (at least once a week for a period of 6 months) with cardiovascular mortality, adjusting for potential confounders-i.e. age, sex, education, wealth, residential place, marital status, ethnicity, and tobacco and alcohol use. To show independent association, the models were further adjusted for hypertension, diabetes, waist and hip circumferences, physical activity, fruit/vegetable intake, aspirin and statin use, and history of cardiovascular diseases and cancers. In total, 8487 participants (72.2% men) were opiate users for a median (IQR) of 10 (4-20) years. During 548 940 person-years-median of 11.3 years, >99% success follow-up-3079 cardiovascular deaths occurred, with substantially higher rates in opiate users than non-users (1005 vs. 478 deaths/100 000 person-years). Opiate use was associated with increased cardiovascular mortality, with adjusted HR (95% CI) of 1.63 (1.49-1.79). Overall 10.9% of cardiovascular deaths were attributable to opiate use. The association was independent of the traditional cardiovascular risk factors. CONCLUSION: Long-term opiate use was associated with an increased cardiovascular mortality independent of the traditional risk factors. Further research, particularly on mechanisms of action, is recommended.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Opiate Alkaloids , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Iran/epidemiology , Male , Mortality , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Evidence is emerging for a role of opiates in various cancers. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between regular opium use and cancer incidence. METHODS: This study was done in a population-based cohort of 50â045 individuals aged 40-75 years from northeast Iran. Data on participant demographics, diet, lifestyle, opium use, and different exposures were collected upon enrolment using validated questionnaires. We used proportional hazards regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% CIs for the association between opium use and different cancer types. FINDINGS: During a median 10 years of follow-up, 1833 participants were diagnosed with cancer. Use of opium was associated with an increased risk of developing all cancers combined (HR 1·40, 95% CI 1·24-1·58), gastrointestinal cancers (1·31, 1·11-1·55), and respiratory cancers (2·28, 1·58-3·30) in a dose-dependent manner (ptrend<0·001). For site-specific cancers, use of opium was associated with an increased risk of developing oesophageal (1·38, 1·06-1·80), gastric (1·36, 1·03-1·79), lung (2·21, 1·44-3·39), bladder (2·86, 1·47-5·55), and laryngeal (2·53, 1·21-5·29) cancers in a dose-dependent manner (ptrend<0·05). Only high-dose opium use was associated with pancreatic cancer (2·66, 1·23-5·74). Ingestion of opium (but not smoking opium) was associated with brain (2·15, 1·00-4·63) and liver (2·46, 1·23-4·95) cancers in a dose-dependent manner (prend<0·01). We observed consistent associations among ever and never tobacco users, men and women, and individuals with lower and higher socioeconomic status. INTERPRETATION: Opium users have a significantly higher risk of developing cancers in different organs of the respiratory, digestive, and urinary systems and the CNS. The results of this analysis show that regular use of opiates might increase the risk of a range of cancer types. FUNDING: World Cancer Research Fund International, Cancer Research UK, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, US National Cancer Institute, International Agency for Research on Cancer.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms/epidemiology , Opium Dependence/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Iran/epidemiology , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Previous studies have reported an association between hot tea drinking and risk of esophageal cancer, but no study has examined this association using prospectively and objectively measured tea drinking temperature. We examined the association of tea drinking temperature, measured both objectively and subjectively at study baseline, with future risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in a prospective study. We measured tea drinking temperature using validated methods and collected data on several other tea drinking habits and potential confounders of interest at baseline in the Golestan Cohort Study, a population-based prospective study of 50,045 individuals aged 40-75 years, established in 2004-2008 in northeastern Iran. Study participants were followed-up for a median duration of 10.1 years (505,865 person-years). During 2004-2017, 317 new cases of ESCC were identified. The objectively measured tea temperature (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.10-1.81; for ≥60°C vs. <60°C), reported preference for very hot tea drinking (HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.27-4.56; for "very hot" vs. "cold/lukewarm"), and reported shorter time from pouring tea to drinking (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.01-2.26; for <2 vs. ≥6 min) were all associated with ESCC risk. In analysis of the combined effects of measured temperature and amount, compared to those who drank less than 700 ml of tea/day at <60°C, drinking 700 mL/day or more at a higher-temperature (≥60°C) was consistently associated with an about 90% increase in ESCC risk. Our results substantially strengthen the existing evidence supporting an association between hot beverage drinking and ESCC.
Subject(s)
Drinking , Esophageal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/epidemiology , Hot Temperature , Tea , Adult , Aged , Humans , Iran , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Northeast Iran has one of the highest reported rates of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) worldwide. Decades of investigations in this region have identified some local habits and environmental exposures that increase risk. We analyzed data from the Golestan Cohort Study to determine the individual and combined effects of the major environmental risk factors of ESCC. METHODS: We performed a population-based cohort of 50,045 individuals, 40 to 75 years old, from urban and rural areas across Northeast Iran. Detailed data on demographics, diet, lifestyle, socioeconomic status, temperature of drinking beverages, and different exposures were collected using validated methods, questionnaires, and physical examinations, from 2004 through 2008. Participants were followed from the date of enrollment to the date of first diagnosis of esophageal cancer, date of death from other causes, or date of last follow-up, through December 31, 2017. Proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between different exposures and ESCC. RESULTS: During an average 10 years of follow-up, 317 participants developed ESCC. Opium smoking (HR 1.85; 95% CI 1.18-2.90), drinking hot tea (≥60°C) (HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.15-2.22), low intake of fruits (HR 1.48; 95% CI 1.07-2.05) and vegetables (HR 1.62; 95% CI 1.03-2.56), excessive tooth loss (HR 1.66; 95% CI 1.04-2.64), drinking unpiped water (HR 2.04; 95% CI 1.09-3.81), and exposure to indoor air pollution (HR 1.57; 95% CI 1.08-2.29) were significantly associated with increased risk of ESCC, in a dose-dependent manner. Combined exposure to these risk factors was associated with a stepwise increase in the risk of developing ESCC, reaching a more than 7-fold increase in risk in the highest category. Approximately 75% of the ESCC cases in this region can be attributed to a combination of the identified exposures. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of data from the Golestan Cohort Study in Iran identified multiple risk factors for ESCC in this population. Our findings support the hypothesis that the high rates of ESCC are due to a combination of factors, including thermal injury (from hot tea), exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (from opium and indoor air pollution), and nutrient-deficient diets. We also associated ESCC risk with exposure to unpiped water and tooth loss.
Subject(s)
Environment , Esophageal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/epidemiology , Life Style , Socioeconomic Factors , Adult , Aged , Air Pollution, Indoor/adverse effects , Diet/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/diagnosis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hot Temperature/adverse effects , Humans , Iran/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Opium Dependence/epidemiology , Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons/adverse effects , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Rural Health , Tea/adverse effects , Time Factors , Tooth Loss/epidemiology , Urban Health , Water SupplyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Gastro-Esophageal Malignancies in Northern Iran (GEMINI) research project is an example of recent progress in health research in Iran. The original aim of this project was to identify etiologic factors and prevention measures for upper gastrointestinal cancers in Northern provinces of Iran, but its achievements have gone much beyond this initial goal. METHODS: GEMINI consists of several projects including cancer registries, pilot studies, case-control studies, and the Golestan Cohort Study. GEMINI has been conducted through extensive collaborations between the Digestive Disease Research Center of Tehran University of Medical Sciences with other domestic and international health organizations. The achievements of GEMINI include producing new knowledge, introducing new research methods, developing and expanding health research and health care infrastructures, investing in human resources, and increasing the awareness and knowledge of policy makers and officials at all levels about the importance of chronic diseases in Iran's health priorities. CONCLUSION: The success of GEMINI reveals the feasibility of large-scale health research studies in developing countries and serves as a successful model not only for health research in Iran, but also for similar research studies in other developing nations.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/organization & administration , Developing Countries , Esophageal Neoplasms , Stomach Neoplasms , Biomedical Research/methods , Chronic Disease , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Esophageal Neoplasms/etiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Health Policy , Humans , Iran , Registries , Research Design , Stomach Neoplasms/etiology , Stomach Neoplasms/prevention & controlABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between opium use and subsequent risk of death. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: The Golestan Cohort Study in north-eastern Iran collected detailed validated data on opium use and other exposures at baseline. Participants were enrolled between January 2004 and June 2008 and were followed to May 2011, with a follow-up success rate of over 99%. PARTICIPANTS: 50,045 participants aged 40-75 at baseline. MAIN OUTCOMES: Mortality, all cause and major subcategories. RESULTS: 17% (n = 8487) of the participants reported opium use, with a mean duration of 12.7 years. During the follow-up period 2145 deaths were reported. The adjusted hazard ratio for all cause mortality associated with ever use of opium was 1.86 (95% confidence interval 1.68 to 2.06). Opium consumption was significantly associated with increased risks of deaths from several causes including circulatory diseases (hazard ratio 1.81) and cancer (1.61). The strongest associations were seen with deaths from asthma, tuberculosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (11.0, 6.22, and 5.44, respectively). After exclusion of people who self prescribed opium after the onset of major chronic illnesses, the associations remained strong with a dose-response relation. CONCLUSION: Opium users have an increased risk of death from multiple causes compared with non-users. Increased risks were also seen in people who used low amounts of opium for a long period and those who had no major illness before use.
Subject(s)
Cause of Death , Opioid-Related Disorders/mortality , Opium/adverse effects , Adult , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Surveys , Humans , Iran/epidemiology , Male , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Mammographic density is a useful biomarker of breast cancer risk. Computer-based methods can provide continuous data suitable for analysis. This study aimed to compare a semi-automated computer-assisted method (Cumulus) and a fully automated volumetric computer method (standard mammogram form (SMF)) for assessing mammographic density using data from a previously conducted randomised placebo-controlled trial of an isoflavone supplement. METHODS: Mammograms were obtained from participants in the intervention study. A total of 177 women completed the study. Baseline and follow-up mammograms were digitised and density was estimated using Cumulus (read by two readers) and SMF. Left-right correlation, changes in density over time, and difference between intervention and control groups were evaluated. Changes of density over time, and changes between intervention group and control group were examined using paired t-test and Student's t-test, respectively. RESULTS: Inter-reader correlation coefficient by Cumulus was 0.90 for dense area, and 0.86 for percentage density. Left-right correlation of percent density was lower in SMF than in Cumulus. Among all women, percentage density by Cumulus decreased significantly over time, but no change was seen for SMF percentage density. The intervention group showed marginally significant greater reduction of percent density by Cumulus compared to controls (p=0.04), but the difference became weak after adjustment for baseline percent density (p=0.06). No other measurement demonstrated significant difference between intervention and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: This comparison suggests that slightly different conclusions could be drawn from different methods used to assess breast density. The development of a more robust fully automated method is awaited.
Subject(s)
Breast/anatomy & histology , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Mammography/methods , Aged , Female , Humans , Isoflavones/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
Nutritional exposures are often measured with considerable error in commonly used surrogate instruments such as the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) (denoted by Q(i) for the ith subject). The error can be both systematic and random. The diet record (DR) denoted by R(i) for the ith subject is considered an alloyed gold standard. However, some authors have reported both systematic and random errors with this instrument as well.One goal in measurement error research is to estimate the regression coefficient of T(i) (true intake for the ith subject) on Q(i) denoted by lambda(TQ). If the systematic errors in Q(i) and R(i) (denoted by q(i) and r(i)) are uncorrelated, then one can obtain an unbiased estimate of lambda(TQ) by lambda(RQ) obtained by regressing R(i) on Q(i). However, if Corr(q(i), r(i))>0, then lambda(RQ)>lambda(TQ).In this paper, we propose a method for indirectly estimating lambda(TQ) even in the presence of correlated systematic error based on a longitudinal design where Q(i) (surrogate measure of dietary intake), R(i) (a reference measure of dietary intake), and M(i) (a biomarker) are available on the same subjects at 2 time points. In addition, between-person variation in mean levels of M(i) among people with the same dietary intake is also accounted for. The methodology is illustrated for dietary vitamin C intake based on longitudinal data from 323 subjects in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk study who provided two measures of dietary vitamin C intake from the FFQ (Q(i)) and a 7-day DR (R(i)) and plasma vitamin C (M(i)) 4 years apart.
Subject(s)
Bias , Feeding Behavior , Longitudinal Studies , Models, Statistical , Nutritional Status , Aged , Diet Records , Female , Humans , Male , Nutrition Assessment , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
In contrast to some extensively examined food mutagens, for example, aflatoxins, N-nitrosamines and heterocyclic amines, some other food contaminants, in particular polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and other aromatic compounds, have received less attention. Therefore, exploring the relationships between dietary habits and the levels of biomarkers related to exposure to aromatic compounds is highly relevant. We have investigated in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort the association between dietary items (food groups and nutrients) and aromatic DNA adducts and 4-aminobiphenyl-Hb adducts. Both types of adducts are biomarkers of carcinogen exposure and possibly of cancer risk, and were measured, respectively, in leucocytes and erythrocytes of 1086 (DNA adducts) and 190 (Hb adducts) non-smokers. An inverse, statistically significant, association has been found between DNA adduct levels and dietary fibre intake (P = 0.02), vitamin E (P = 0.04) and alcohol (P = 0.03) but not with other nutrients or food groups. Also, an inverse association between fibre and fruit intake, and BMI and 4-aminobiphenyl-Hb adducts (P = 0.03, 0.04, and 0.03 respectively) was observed. After multivariate regression analysis these inverse correlations remained statistically significant, except for the correlation adducts v. fruit intake. The present study suggests that fibre intake in the usual range can modify the level of DNA or Hb aromatic adducts, but such role seems to be quantitatively modest. Fibres could reduce the formation of DNA adducts in different manners, by diluting potential food mutagens and carcinogens in the gastrointestinal tract, by speeding their transit through the colon and by binding carcinogenic substances.
Subject(s)
Carcinogens/analysis , DNA Adducts/analysis , Dietary Fiber/administration & dosage , Erythrocytes/chemistry , Hemoglobins/analysis , Leukocytes/chemistry , Aged , Air Pollutants/toxicity , Alcohol Drinking , Biomarkers/analysis , Body Mass Index , Carcinogens/metabolism , Colonic Neoplasms/prevention & control , DNA Adducts/metabolism , Europe , Fabaceae , Female , Fruit , Hemoglobins/metabolism , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Ozone/toxicity , Prospective Studies , VegetablesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: International multicentre studies on diet and cancer are relatively new in epidemiological research. They offer a series of challenging methodological issues for the evaluation of the association between dietary exposure and disease outcomes, which can both be quite heterogeneous across different geographical regions. This requires considerable work to standardize dietary measurements at the food and the nutrient levels. METHODS: Within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC), a calibration study was set up to express individual dietary intakes according to the same reference scale. A linear regression calibration model was used to correct the association between diet and disease for measurement errors in dietary exposures. In the present work, we describe an approach for analysing the EPIC data, using as an example the evaluation of the association between fish intake and colorectal cancer incidence. RESULTS: Sex- and country-specific attenuation factors ranged from 0.083 to 0.784, with values overall higher for men compared with women. Hazard ratio estimates of colorectal cancer for a 10 g/day increase in fish intake were 0.97 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95-0.99] and 0.93 (0.88-0.98), before and after calibration, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a multicentre study, the diet/disease association can be evaluated by exploiting the whole variability of intake over the entire study. Calibration may reduce between-centre heterogeneity in the diet-disease relationship caused by differential impact of measurement errors across cohorts.
Subject(s)
Diet/adverse effects , Linear Models , Neoplasms/etiology , Adult , Aged , Animals , Calibration , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiology , Culture , Diet Surveys , Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic , Europe , Female , Fishes , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Biological , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We propose three concepts of sensitivity in cancer screening and apply to data on prostate cancer. Conceptual entities: Sensitivity is the indicator on the ability of screening to find cancer in the detectable preclinical phase (DPCP). The ability is usually specified as to the screening test. We call this entity the test sensitivity. Test positivity with histological confirmation refers to the full diagnostic process and we call the corresponding entity as episode sensitivity. Ultimately, a screening programme identifies a proportion of cancers in the DPCP in the total target population, that we call programme sensitivity. We derive the formulae for these three sensitivities consistent with the incidence method. EXAMPLE: Our example on estimation of the three sensitivities is from a randomized screening trial for prostate cancer in Finland. The estimates by incidence method were substantially different, 85% for test sensitivity, 48% for episode sensitivity and 36% for programme sensitivity. CONCLUSION: More than one concept of sensitivity with standard method of estimation is needed to describe the ability of screening to identify the disease in the DPCP.
Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Aged , Finland , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Theoretical , Sensitivity and Specificity , Treatment Refusal/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty regarding the association of occupational exposures with lung cancer. We have studied the association between 52 high-risk job titles and lung cancer incidence in a large prospective study, with more than 200,000 participants followed for more than 6 years and 809 incident cases of lung cancer. METHODS: Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed by the Cox proportional-hazard regression model, adjusting for country, age, sex, social class, diet, physical activity, and smoking habits. We used a CAREX-based job-exposure matrix to infer exposure to lung carcinogens. False-positive report probability was calculated as a measure of potentially false-positive results. RESULTS: Eighteen occupations, mainly related with agriculture, constructions, and metal processing, were associated with increased risk. In addition, incidence tended to increase with the number of hazardous jobs reported. When the occupations were classified according to the presumed exposure to specific carcinogenic agents, the hazard ratios were 1.5 (95% confidence interval = 1.2-1.9) for asbestos, 1.4 (1.1-1.8) for heavy metals, 1.4 (1.1-1.8) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and 1.6 (1.2-2.1) for work-related environmental tobacco smoke. The estimated population attributable risk for employment in at least 1 at-risk job was 16% in men and 12% in women. CONCLUSIONS: This large prospective study suggests that exposure to occupational lung carcinogens is still a problem, with such exposures producing moderate to large increases in risk.
Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Occupational Exposure , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/adverse effects , Aged , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Several countries are discussing new legislation on the ban of smoking in public places, and on the acceptable levels of traffic-related air pollutants. It is therefore useful to estimate the burden of disease associated with indoor and outdoor air pollution. METHODS: We have estimated exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) and to air pollution in never smokers and ex-smokers in a large prospective study in 10 European countries (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition)(N = 520,000). We report estimates of the proportion of lung cancers attributable to ETS and air pollution in this population. RESULTS: The proportion of lung cancers in never- and ex-smokers attributable to ETS was estimated as between 16 and 24%, mainly due to the contribution of work-related exposure. We have also estimated that 5-7% of lung cancers in European never smokers and ex-smokers are attributable to high levels of air pollution, as expressed by NO2 or proximity to heavy traffic roads. NO2 is the expression of a mixture of combustion (traffic-related) particles and gases, and is also related to power plants and waste incinerator emissions. DISCUSSION: We have estimated risks of lung cancer attributable to ETS and traffic-related air pollution in a large prospective study in Europe. Information bias can be ruled out due to the prospective design, and we have thoroughly controlled for potential confounders, including restriction to never smokers and long-term ex-smokers. Concerning traffic-related air pollution, the thresholds for indicators of exposure we have used are rather strict, i.e. they correspond to the high levels of exposure that characterize mainly Southern European countries (levels of NO2 in Denmark and Sweden are closer to 10-20 ug/m3, whereas levels in Italy are around 30 or 40, or higher).Therefore, further reduction in exposure levels below 30 ug/m3 would correspond to additional lung cancer cases prevented, and our estimate of 5-7% is likely to be an underestimate. Overall, our prospective study draws attention to the need for strict legislation concerning the quality of air in Europe.
Subject(s)
Air Pollution/statistics & numerical data , Cost of Illness , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/statistics & numerical data , Air Pollutants , Case-Control Studies , Causality , Cohort Studies , Europe/epidemiology , Humans , Inhalation Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Odds Ratio , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between fruit and vegetable consumption and self-reported physical and mental functional health measured by an anglicised short-form 36-item questionnaire (UK SF-36). DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study. SETTING: General community in Norfolk, UK. SUBJECTS: A total of 16,792 men and women aged 40-79 years recruited from general practice population registers as part of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk study, who completed food-frequency questionnaires in 1993-1997 and Health and Life Experiences Questionnaires 18 months later, were enrolled in the study. RESULTS: Mean SF-36 physical component summary scores increased significantly with increasing total fruit and vegetable consumption in both men and women (P < 0.0001 for trend). Men and women in the top quartile of consumption compared with the bottom quartile had a significantly higher likelihood of reporting good physical health (defined as a score > or = 55); odds ratio (OR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.53 for men and OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.11-1.48 for women, after controlling for age, body mass index, smoking, education, social class, prevalent illness and total energy intake. Exclusion of current smokers and people with prevalent illness did not alter the associations. CONCLUSION: Higher fruit and vegetable consumption is associated with better self-reported physical functional health within a general population. Increasing daily intake by two portions of fruit and vegetables was associated with an 11% higher likelihood of good functional health. Since the current average consumption of fruit and vegetables in the UK is about three portions, the recommended 'five a day' strategy may have additional benefit for functional as well as other health outcomes in the population.
Subject(s)
Diet Surveys , Fruit , Health Status , Vegetables , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Confidence Intervals , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Likelihood Functions , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Physical Fitness , Prospective Studies , Self Concept , Self Disclosure , Surveys and Questionnaires , United KingdomSubject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological/physiology , Amino Acid Substitution/genetics , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/genetics , Life Change Events , Methionine/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/genetics , Valine/genetics , Alleles , Character , Codon/genetics , Gene Frequency/genetics , Genotype , Hippocampus/pathology , Humans , Individuality , Internal-External Control , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/genetics , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychologyABSTRACT
Recent research has suggested that brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) may be implicated in the aetiology of mood-related phenotypes. Here we report an investigation of the association between a BDNF coding variant (Val66Met, rs6265) and mood status in a large non-clinical sample of men and women. We genotyped 7389 adult men and women, aged 41-80 years, selected from participants in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition in Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk, United Kingdom). Evidence of past year prevalent, lifetime and recurrent episodic major depressive disorder (MDD) and of past year prevalent and lifetime generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), defined by DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, was assessed through questionnaire together with a five-item version of the Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5). A total of 1214 (16.4%) participants reported lifetime MDD and 355 (4.8%) reported lifetime GAD. In this population based study we found no evidence to support an association between the BDNF gene Val66Met polymorphism and mood status.
Subject(s)
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/genetics , Mood Disorders/genetics , Polymorphism, Genetic/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , DNA Primers/genetics , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Genotype , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mood Disorders/diagnosis , Phenotype , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Physical activity is inversely associated with the risk of future coronary artery disease. Whether this relationship is in part mediated by lower levels of systemic inflammation, as indicated by C-reactive protein concentrations, is unknown. METHODS: We performed a nested case-control study among apparently healthy men and women enrolled in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Norfolk prospective population study, to investigate the relationship among habitual (work-related and leisure time) physical activity, cardiovascular risk factors and the risk of future coronary artery disease. RESULTS: Among men, those with an active lifestyle had a significantly lower risk of future coronary artery disease than those with an inactive lifestyle [odds ratio (OR) 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.90; P for linearity, 0.008], after adjustment for smoking, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, body mass index and low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Additional adjustment for C-reactive protein levels attenuated this relationship only slightly (OR 0.68; 95%CI 0.49-0.93; P for linearity, 0.02). Similarly, active women had an adjusted odds ratio of 0.48 (0.28-0.82; P for linearity <0.001) for future coronary artery disease compared with inactive women. Additional adjustment for C-reactive protein levels attenuated this relationship slightly (OR 0.51; 0.30-0.87; P for linearity, 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: We observed that people with an active lifestyle had a substantially lower risk of future coronary artery disease than people with an inactive lifestyle, and that this relationship was partly mediated through lower levels of established cardiovascular risk factors and in addition, C-reactive protein. This observation suggests that reduced systemic inflammation may be one of the mechanisms through which physical activity leads to reduced cardiovascular risk.
Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Coronary Artery Disease/prevention & control , Motor Activity , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between fish consumption and stroke risk. DESIGN: Prospective population cohort study. SETTING: Norfolk, UK cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC-Norfolk). SUBJECTS: Subjects were 24 312 men and women aged 40-79 years who had no previous history of stroke at baseline. METHODS: Fish consumption was assessed using a food-frequency questionnaire at baseline in 1993-1997 and stroke incidence ascertained to 2004. RESULTS: A total of 421 incident strokes were identified (mean follow-up=8.5 years, total person-years=209 238). There were no significant relationships between total fish, shellfish or fish roe consumption and risk of stroke in men and women after adjusting for age, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, smoking, cholesterol, diabetes, physical activity, alcohol consumption, fish oil supplement use and total energy intake using Cox regression analyses. Oily fish consumption was significantly lower in women who subsequently had a stroke (odds ratio (OR) for consumers vs. non-consumers=0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-0.94, P=0.02). The trend in men was similar but not significant (OR for consumers vs. non-consumers=0.88, 95% CI 0.65-1.19, P=0.41). CONCLUSIONS: There was no consistent relationship between fish consumption and stroke in this British population. Inconsistencies in the observed health effects of fish consumption in different populations may reflect different patterns and type of fish consumed and preparation methods.
Subject(s)
Diet , Feeding Behavior , Seafood , Stroke/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Fatty Acids, Omega-3/administration & dosage , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Stroke/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Most studies to date support a protective role of physical activity in reducing stroke risk. However, they were not able to take into account combined work and leisure activity. We prospectively followed up 22,602 men and women aged 40-79 years, who had no history of stroke and myocardial infarction at baseline, participating in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer-Norfolk. Participants were categorized into four levels of physical activity based on a validated self-reported questionnaire, which assesses combined work and leisure activities, at baseline during the period from 1993 to 1997. Stroke incidence was ascertained by death certificate and hospital record linkage data up to 2004, average 8.6 years of follow-up. We used the Cox proportional hazards model. There were 361 incident strokes during follow-up (total person years = 195,092). After adjusting for age, sex, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, cholesterol, history of diabetes and smoking, men and women who were physically active were less likely to have a stroke (relative risk = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.49-0.99, p = 0.024) compared to those who were inactive. This highlights the fact that efforts to increase physical activity in both the work place and in leisure time should be encouraged.
Subject(s)
Employment , Exercise , Leisure Activities , Stroke/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , Sex Distribution , United Kingdom/epidemiologyABSTRACT
High plasma concentrations of ascorbic acid, a marker of fruit and vegetable intake, are associated with low risk of coronary artery disease. Whether this relationship is explained by a reduction in systemic inflammation is unclear. We investigated the relationship between ascorbic acid plasma concentration and coronary artery disease risk, and in addition whether this relationship depended on classical risk factors and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration. We used a prospective nested case-control design. The study consisted of 979 cases and 1794 controls (1767 men and 1006 women). Increasing ascorbic acid quartiles were associated with lower age, BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and CRP concentration, but with higher HDL-cholesterol concentration. No associations existed between ascorbic acid concentration and total cholesterol concentration or LDL-cholesterol concentration. When data from men and women were pooled, the risk estimates decreased with increasing ascorbic acid quartiles such that people in the highest ascorbic acid quartile had an odds ratio for future coronary artery disease of 0.67 (95 % CI 0.52, 0.87) compared with those in the lowest quartile (P for linearity=0.001). This relationship was independent of sex, age, diabetes, smoking, BMI, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, systolic blood pressure and CRP level. These data suggest that the risk reduction associated with higher ascorbic acid plasma concentrations, a marker of fruit and vegetable intake, is independent of classical risk factors and also independent of CRP concentration.