Exposures to automatic dishwashing rinse aids reported to the United Kingdom National Poisons Information Service 2008-2016.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the toxicity of rinse aids which are used as drying aids to remove water from crockery. METHODS: Enquiries to the UK National Poisons Information Service (NPIS) were analysed retrospectively for the period January 2008 to December 2016. RESULTS: There were 855 enquiries relating to 828 patients; children aged 5 years or less accounted for 91.1%. Most exposures occurred from ingestion alone (n = 778, 94.0%), but 26 involved ingestion and other routes: 21 with skin contact, 3 with eye contact, and two with both skin and eye contact. There were a further 24 cases of eye contact alone (n = 20, 2.4%) or skin contact alone (n = 3, 0.4%) and a single case of inhalation alone. The World Health Organisation/International Programme on Chemical Safety/European Commission/European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists (WHO/IPCS/EC/EAPCCT) Poisoning severity score [PSS] was known in 824 of the 828 exposures: 425 of 824 (51.6%) patients did not develop clinical features, 381 (46.2%) had a PSS of 1 (minor toxicity), 15 (1.8%) developed moderate (PSS 2) and 3 (0.4%) severe (PSS 3) toxicity. Vomiting was the most common feature, occurring in over a third of all ingestions (n = 286, 35.8%), followed by coughing (n = 73, 9.1%). A higher proportion of adults than children developed clinical features (72.7% of 33 vs 46.0% of 767, p = .0026), although vomiting occurred significantly more frequently amongst children (p = .0315). Of the 25 eye contact cases, eye pain (n = 8) and/or eye irritation (n = 8) were reported, with or without abnormal vision (n = 7); there were two cases of corneal abrasion. Dermal contact rarely produced features; only 4 of 26 patients reported symptoms including skin rash or burning or numbness at the contact site. CONCLUSIONS: Severe clinical features were uncommon following rinse aid exposure; vomiting was the most frequently reported symptom following ingestion.

Toxicity resulting from exposure to oven cleaners as reported to the UK National Poisons Information Service (NPIS) from 2009 to 2015.

INTRODUCTION: Oven cleaning products contain corrosive substances, typically sodium or potassium hydroxide. OBJECTIVE: To determine the reported toxicity from exposure to oven cleaning products. METHODS: Telephone enquiries to the UK National Poisons Information Service regarding oven cleaning products were analysed retrospectively for the period January 2009 to December 2015. RESULTS: There were 796 enquiries relating to 780 patients. Ninety-six percent of the products involved in the reported exposures contained sodium hydroxide and/or potassium hydroxide. Ingestion alone (n = 285) or skin contact alone (n = 208) accounted for the majority of cases; inhalation alone (n = 101), eye contact alone (n = 97), and multiple routes of exposure (n = 89) accounted for the remainder. Ninety-five percent of patients exposed by inhalation, 94% exposed dermally and 85% reporting eye exposure, developed features of toxicity. Patients exposed by multiple routes developed symptoms in 70% of cases. Only 103 of the 285 patients ingested oven cleaner directly, whereas 182 patients ingested food they considered to have been contaminated with oven cleaner. In 100 of the 103 direct ingestions where the features and World Health Organisation/International Programme on Chemical Safety/European Commission/European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists Poisoning Severity Score were known, 56 reported symptoms which were minor in 51 cases. The most common features following ingestion were vomiting (n = 26), abdominal pain (n = 22) or pharyngitis (n = 15). Skin burns (n = 91) predominantly involving the hands or arms, occurred in 44% of dermal exposures. Following inhalation, patients frequently developed respiratory features (n = 52) including coughing and chest pain/tightness. Eye pain (n = 43) and conjunctivitis (n = 33) commonly occurred following ocular exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Most (71%) patients exposed to an oven cleaner irrespective of the route of exposure developed features of toxicity, though in most cases only minor features developed; moderate or severe features ensued in ∼4%. Those patients exposed dermally, ophthalmically or by inhalation developed features more frequently (≥85%) than those who ingested a product directly (56%).