Telehealth Utilization in Oral Medicine and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Objectives: The objectives of this retrospective study were to analyze telehealth utilization for two specialty care practices: oral medicine (OM) and oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) during the first 2 years of the pandemic, its impact as a new treatment modality and on participating providers, as well as identify the type of patient visit that most readily adopted telehealth. Methods: Retrospective study of patients who sought specialty services, OM and OMFS, at an outpatient clinic in a university health system setting between March 1, 2019, and February 28, 2022. Source data were obtained from Epic, an electronic medical record application. Data were graphed using Tableau and Microsoft Excel software. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing chi-squared test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: OMFS utilized telehealth 12% of the time, and OM 8% of the time. The majority (87%) of telehealth visits were for return patients (RPs). Compared with the first year of the pandemic, there was a decrease in the number of telehealth visits in the second year (p = 0.0001). As of August 2022, new patient (NP) telehealth encounters have largely returned to prepandemic levels (0-1.5%), whereas RP telehealth visits remained at an average level of 11.4% (9.4-12.4%). Surveyed providers consider telehealth as an effective complement to in-person care and will continue its use (4.2/5 Likert scale). Conclusions: Telehealth has become a viable pathway of care for OM and OMFS who previously did not utilize the remote platform to deliver healthcare. As a new treatment modality, telehealth is perceived as impactful in increasing access to specialty care by participating providers. NP visits are now almost completely in person, but telehealth continues for RPs. Ongoing demand for telehealth highlights urgency to develop appropriate standards and effective remote diagnostic/monitoring tools to maximize telehealth's capability to leverage finite health care resources and increase access to specialty care.

How has the COVID Pandemic Impacted the Clinical Volume and Variety of an Academic Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Program?

PURPOSE: Attempts to mitigate the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID) have disrupted the delivery of non-pandemic care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the COVID pandemic on surgical volume and variety at an academic oral and maxillofacial surgery program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the surgical logs of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery from January 2012 through January 2021. Each record identified patient demographics and case classifications. The study predictor was timing of care, which was divided into pre-pandemic, peak pandemic, or post-peak pandemic. The primary study outcomes were the monthly procedure count and the procedure categories. The secondary dependent variables were patient age and race. Multivariate and univariate analyses of variance were used to determine whether pandemic effects existed within outcome groups. RESULTS: The final sample included 64,709 surgical procedures. Before, during, and after the pandemic peak, there were means of 691.0, 209.0, and 789.4 procedures per time period, respectively (P < .01). There was significantly more infection (baseline 2.2%, peak 6.0%, post-peak 2.0%, P < .01) and trauma (baseline 5.3%, peak 26.7%, post-peak 3.9%, P < .01) cases during the pandemic peak. The mean percentage of pediatric patients increased during the peak and post-peak periods (baseline 2.4%, peak 12.9%, post-peak 10.2%, P < .01). No differences were observed among the mean percentage of White (P = .12), Black (P = .21), and Hispanic (P = .25) patients treated. CONCLUSIONS: Along with a predictable decline in surgical numbers, a greater proportion of infection and trauma procedures were performed at the pandemic's peak. Despite these changes, surgery volume normalized and case variety returned to pre-pandemic levels in the post-peak period. Our study suggests that the addition of COVID restrictions did not change the case volume or variety in the months' after the initial crisis.

Epidemiologic Patterns of Maxillofacial Trauma in a Metropolitan Area: A Retrospective Analysis.

PURPOSE: To illuminate epidemiologic trends of maxillofacial trauma in an urban setting over an 11-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an exhaustive database search at the University of Pennsylvania. The data were collected from 11 years of attending oral and maxillofacial surgery clinician and resident operating room logs and was conducted from 2011 to 2021. The procedures where then selected for those that represented maxillofacial trauma. RESULTS: About 3,427 procedures met the inclusion and exclusion criteria to be considered a novel incidence of trauma. Dramatic differences in maxillofacial trauma exist between time of the year, patient age, and patient race. There is a correlation between summer time criminal activity and maxillofacial trauma. African-Americans ages 18 to 65 are the most affected patient demographic. CONCLUSIONS: With datasets of this size spanning over a decade, epidemiologic trends are able to be illuminated. There is a need for understanding the disparity between the demographics of the Philadelphia population and oral-maxillofacial (OM) trauma patients. A prospective extension of this study is to explore secondary, tertiary and quaternary ICD-10 codes to illuminate common injury patterns in OM trauma of varying patient populations.