Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Epilepsia ; 51(1): 37-42, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19490039

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To count patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy entering early and late remission and to identify prognostic predictors of late remission. METHODS: Children and adults with previously untreated epilepsy from two Italian tertiary centers (Monza, Bari) were the study population. All patients received monotherapy at treatment start; drug choice and schedule were left to the physician's judgment. A retrospective audit was performed and the following prognostic predictors were identified: age, gender, putative etiology, first electroencephalography (EEG) record, neurologic and psychiatric examination, disease duration at diagnosis, seizure type(s) and number prior to starting treatment, epilepsy syndrome, and first antiepileptic drug. Early remission was defined by 2-year seizure control immediately after treatment start. Late remission was defined by 2-year seizure control achieved at least 24 months after treatment start. Prognostic predictors were assessed by logistic regression analysis, adjusting for age, gender, and center. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four women and 178 men (mean age 31.5 years) were included and followed for 2399.6 person-years. The cumulative time-dependent probability of 2-year remission was 56.3% at 2 years after treatment start, and 62.6, 69.4, and 79.5% at 3, 5, and 10 years. One hundred fifteen patients (23.0%) achieved early remission and 38 patients (10.8%) achieved late remission. The interaction between partial seizures and number of seizures prior to treatment was the only independent predictor of late remission. DISCUSSION: The course of epilepsy and the chance of remission are together a complex and dynamic process, possibly explained by the diversity of the mechanisms underlying drug response and the use of an increasing number of drugs.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Drug Resistance , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Probability , Prognosis , Remission Induction , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Syndrome , Treatment Outcome
2.
Epilepsia ; 49(4): 663-9, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18266754

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A multicenter, prospective, long-term, open-label study to evaluate the effects of levetiracetam on electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormalities and photoparoxysmal response (PPR) of patients affected by juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). METHODS: Forty-eight patients with newly diagnosed JME (10) or resistant/intolerant (38) to previous antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were enrolled. After an 8-week baseline period, levetiracetam was titrated in 2 weeks to 500 mg b.i.d. and then increased to up to 3,000 mg/day. Efficacy parameters were based on the comparison and analysis of EEG interictal abnormalities classified as spikes-and-waves, polyspikes-and-waves, and presence of PPR. Secondary end point was evaluation of EEG and PPR changes as predictive factors of 12-month seizure freedom. RESULTS: Overall, mean dose of levetiracetam was 2,208 mg/day. Mean study period was 19.3 +/- 11.5 months (range 0.3-38). During the baseline period, interictal EEG abnormalities were detected in 44/48 patients (91.6%) and PPR was determined in 17/48 (35.4%) of patients. After levetiracetam treatment, 27/48 (56.2%) of patients compared to 4/48 (8.3%) in the baseline period (p < 0.0001) had a normal EEG. Thirteen of 17 (76.4%) (p < 0.0003) patients showed suppression of PPR. Cumulative probability of days with myoclonia (DWM) 12-month remission was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in patients with a normal (normalized) EEG after levetiracetam treatment compared to those with an unchanged EEG. CONCLUSIONS: Levetiracetam appeared to be effective in decreasing epileptiform EEG abnormalities, and suppressing the PPR in JME patients. This effect, along with a good efficacy and tolerability profile in this population further supports a first-line role for levetiracetam in the treatment of JME.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Electroencephalography/drug effects , Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile/drug therapy , Piracetam/analogs & derivatives , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Anticonvulsants/pharmacology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Resistance , Electroencephalography/statistics & numerical data , Epilepsy, Reflex/diagnosis , Epilepsy, Reflex/drug therapy , Epilepsy, Reflex/prevention & control , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Levetiracetam , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile/diagnosis , Photic Stimulation , Piracetam/pharmacology , Piracetam/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
Seizure ; 15(2): 112-6, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16406697

ABSTRACT

The objective of this observational study was to compare the efficacy of levetiracetam and topiramate during the first 15 days of add-on treatment in adults with refractory partial epilepsy. Two cohorts of patients with > or =3 simple or complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalisation per month over an 8-week baseline period received levetiracetam or topiramate in two distinct phases, in addition to standard antiepileptic treatment. During the first 15 days of the therapy, levetiracetam was added at the dosage of 250 mg b.i.d. or topiramate at 25mg o.i.d. Efficacy parameters included number of seizure-free days (SFDs), mean and percent reduction in seizure frequency (in general and by type), and number of seizure-free patients in the first 15 days of treatment compared to last 15 days of the baseline period. Sixty-one patients received levetiracetam and 61 topiramate. The general characteristics of the two treatment groups were similar. The total number of SFDs during 15 days before treatment was 637 with levetiracetam and 621 with topiramate; in the 15-day evaluation period the SFDs increased to 748 (17.4%) and 668 (7.6%), respectively (ANOVA, p<0.05). Twenty-six patients (42.6%) taking levetiracetam were seizure free compared to 10 (16.4%) receiving topiramate (chi-square, p=0.003). This open-label non-controlled study suggests an early efficacy of levetiracetam as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial epilepsy: these results appear to confirm previous indications of a rapid onset of action and seem to suggest first evaluation of the patient at the dose of 500 mg/day before increasing to the considered minimum standard dose of 1000 mg/day, as some patients could respond to the starting dose.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/pharmacokinetics , Epilepsies, Partial/drug therapy , Fructose/analogs & derivatives , Piracetam/analogs & derivatives , Adolescent , Adult , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Epilepsies, Partial/metabolism , Female , Fructose/pharmacokinetics , Fructose/therapeutic use , Humans , Levetiracetam , Male , Middle Aged , Piracetam/pharmacokinetics , Piracetam/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Topiramate , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...