Neurologic Manifestations of Common Variable Immunodeficiency: Impact on Quality of Life.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Common variable immunodeficiency is a systemic disease and not solely a disease of humoral immunity. Neurologic symptoms associated with common variable immunodeficiency are underrecognized and warrant further study. This work aimed to characterize the neurologic symptoms reported by people living with common variable immunodeficiency. METHODS: We conducted a single academic medical center study of neurologic symptoms reported by adults previously diagnosed with common variable immunodeficiency. We used a survey of common neurologic symptoms to determine the prevalence of these symptoms in a population with common variable immunodeficiency and further assessed these patient-reported symptoms with validated questionnaires and compared symptom burden with other neurologic conditions. RESULTS: A volunteer sample of adults (aged 18 years or older) previously diagnosed with common variable immunodeficiency at the University of Utah Clinical Immunology/Immune Deficiency Clinic who were able to read and comprehend English and willing and able to answer survey-based questions were recruited. Of 148 eligible participants identified, 80 responded and 78 completed the surveys. The mean age of respondents was 51.3 years (range 20-78 years); 73.1% female and 94.8% White. Patients with common variable immunodeficiency reported many common neurologic symptoms (mean 14.6, SD 5.9, range 1-25), with sleep issues, fatigue, and headache reported by more than 85%. Validated questionnaires addressing specific neurologic symptoms supported these results. T-scores on Neuro QoL questionnaires for sleep (mean 56.4, SD 10.4) and fatigue (mean 54.1, SD 11) were higher, indicating more dysfunction, than in the reference clinical population (p < 0.005). The Neuro QoL questionnaire for cognitive function showed a lower T-score (mean 44.8, SD 11.1) than that in the reference general population (p < 0.005), indicating worse function in this domain. DISCUSSION: Among survey respondents, there is a marked burden of neurologic symptoms. Given the impact of neurologic symptoms on health-related quality-of-life measures, clinicians should screen patients with common variable immunodeficiency for the presence of these symptoms and offer referral to neurologists and/or symptomatic treatment when indicated. Frequently prescribed neurologic medications may also affect the immune system, and neurologists should consider screening patients for immune deficiency before prescribing them.

Clinical utility of multigene panel testing in adults with epilepsy and intellectual disability.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic yield of a commercial epilepsy gene panel in adults with chronic epilepsy and accompanying intellectual disability, given that genetic evaluation is often overlooked in this group of patients. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study analyzing the results of epilepsy gene panels including up to 185 genes in adult epilepsy patients with intellectual disability, according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition. Patients with acquired structural brain abnormalities or known chromosomal abnormalities were excluded. RESULTS: From approximately 600 patients seen from January 2017 to June 2018 at a single academic epilepsy center, 64 probands and two affected relatives (32 males, mean age = 31 years ± 10) were selected and clinically tested. Fourteen probands (14/64 = 22%; four males, mean age = 32 years ± 10) were found to have pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the following genes: SCN1A, GABRB3, UBE3A, KANSL1, SLC2A1, KCNQ2, SLC6A1, HNRNPU, STX1B, SCN2A, PURA, and CHD2. Six variants arose de novo, and the inheritance was not determined in eight. Nine probands (64%) had severe or profound intellectual disability, and five (35%) had autistic features. Eight patients (57%) had a diagnostic change from presumptive clinical diagnosis prior to genetic testing. SIGNIFICANCE: We were able to demonstrate that a commercial epilepsy gene panel can be an important resource in clinical practice, identifying the etiology in 22% of adults with epilepsy and intellectual disability. The diagnostic yield is similar to previously reported pediatric cohorts. Larger samples would be required to evaluate the more prevalent genotypes among adult epilepsy patients.