ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Changes in brain stiffness can be an important biomarker for neurological disease. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) quantifies tissue stiffness, but the results vary between acquisition and reconstruction methods. PURPOSE: To measure MRE repeatability and estimate the effect of different reconstruction methods and varying data quality on estimated brain stiffness. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: Fifteen healthy subjects. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T MRI, gradient-echo elastography sequence with a 50 Hz vibration frequency. ASSESSMENT: Imaging was performed twice in each subject. Images were reconstructed using a curl-based and a finite-element-model (FEM)-based method. Stiffness was measured in the whole brain, in white matter, and in four cortical and four deep gray matter regions. Repeatability coefficients (RC), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated. MRE data quality was quantified by the ratio between shear waves and compressional waves. STATISTICAL TESTS: Median values with range are presented. Reconstruction methods were compared using paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and Spearman's rank correlation was calculated between MRE data quality and stiffness. Holm-Bonferroni corrections were employed to adjust for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: In the whole brain, CV was 4.3% and 3.8% for the curl and the FEM reconstruction, respectively, with 4.0-12.8% for subregions. Whole-brain ICC was 0.60-0.74, ranging from 0.20 to 0.89 in different regions. RC for the whole brain was 0.14 kPa and 0.17 kPa for the curl and FEM methods, respectively. FEM reconstruction resulted in 39% higher stiffness than the curl reconstruction (P < 0.05). MRE data quality, defined as shear-compression wave ratio, was higher in peripheral regions than in central regions of the brain (P < 0.05). No significant correlations were observed between MRE data quality and stiffness estimates. DATA CONCLUSION: MRE of the human brain is a robust technique in terms of repeatability. Caution is warranted when comparing stiffness values obtained with different techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1.
Subject(s)
Elasticity Imaging Techniques , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Echo-Planar Imaging , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We designed and built dedicated active magnetic resonance (MR)-tracked (MRTR) stylets. We explored the role of MRTR in a prospective clinical trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eleven gynecologic cancer patients underwent MRTR to rapidly optimize interstitial catheter placement. MRTR catheter tip location and orientation were computed and overlaid on images displayed on in-room monitors at rates of 6 to 16 frames per second. Three modes of actively tracked navigation were analyzed: coarse navigation to the approximate region around the tumor; fine-tuning, bringing the stylets to the desired location; and pullback, with MRTR stylets rapidly withdrawn from within the catheters, providing catheter trajectories for radiation treatment planning (RTP). Catheters with conventional stylets were inserted, forming baseline locations. MRTR stylets were substituted, and catheter navigation was performed by a clinician working inside the MRI bore, using monitor feedback. RESULTS: Coarse navigation allowed repositioning of the MRTR catheters tips by 16 mm (mean), relative to baseline, in 14 ± 5 s/catheter (mean ± standard deviation [SD]). The fine-tuning mode repositioned the catheter tips by a further 12 mm, in 24 ± 17 s/catheter. Pullback mode provided catheter trajectories with RTP point resolution of â¼1.5 mm, in 1 to 9 s/catheter. CONCLUSIONS: MRTR-based navigation resulted in rapid and optimal placement of interstitial brachytherapy catheters. Catheters were repositioned compared with the initial insertion without tracking. In pullback mode, catheter trajectories matched computed tomographic precision, enabling their use for RTP.
