Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Otol Neurotol ; 31(6): 908-18, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20418791

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: An intelligent agent, Fitting to Outcomes eXpert, was developed to optimize and automate Cochlear implant (CI) programming. The current article describes the rationale, development, and features of this tool. BACKGROUND: Cochlear implant fitting is a time-consuming procedure to define the value of a subset of the available electric parameters based primarily on behavioral responses. It is comfort-driven with high intraindividual and interindividual variability both with respect to the patient and to the clinician. Its validity in terms of process control can be questioned. Good clinical practice would require an outcome-driven approach. An intelligent agent may help solve the complexity of addressing more electric parameters based on a range of outcome measures. METHODS: A software application was developed that consists of deterministic rules that analyze the map settings in the processor together with psychoacoustic test results (audiogram, A(section sign)E phoneme discrimination, A(section sign)E loudness scaling, speech audiogram) obtained with that map. The rules were based on the daily clinical practice and the expertise of the CI programmers. The data transfer to and from this agent is either manual or through seamless digital communication with the CI fitting database and the psychoacoustic test suite. It recommends and executes modifications to the map settings to improve the outcome. RESULTS: Fitting to Outcomes eXpert is an operational intelligent agent, the principles of which are described. Its development and modes of operation are outlined, and a case example is given. Fitting to Outcomes eXpert is in use for more than a year now and seems to be capable to improve the measured outcome. CONCLUSION: It is argued that this novel tool allows a systematic approach focusing on outcome, reducing the fitting time, and improving the quality of fitting. It introduces principles of artificial intelligence in the process of CI fitting.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Expert Systems , Logic , Software , Algorithms , Audiometry , Electronics , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Female , Humans , Prosthesis Design , Psychoacoustics , Reflex/physiology , Speech Perception/physiology , Stapedius/physiology , Young Adult
2.
Otol Neurotol ; 25(6): 924-9, 2004 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15547421

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Congenital deafness leads to major problems in speech, language, education, and social integration. Neonatal hearing screening and cochlear implantation now allow early hearing restoration. This article reports on a prospective longitudinal study of the first infant ever who received two cochlear implants in the prelexical period of her life. METHODS: The first deaf-born girl ever who received two implants at the ages of 5 and 15 months, respectively, was followed-up with repeated and detailed quantitative assessments from birth to 4 years of age. This consisted of 1) audiologic evaluation (audiometry, speech audiometry, and Categories of Auditory Performance score), 2) linguistic evaluation (monthly video analyses and tests of vocabulary, language skills, grammar, and intelligibility of the child's speech), and 3) descriptive assessment of the educational setting. RESULTS: All results lie within the 95% confidence interval of hearing peers. The audiologic performance lies at or above average from age 2 years onward. The child started babbling at the normal age of 8 months. Her linguistic skills increased from low percentiles before age 2 to above average from age 2 for comprehension and from age 3 for production. The grammar and intelligibility of the child's speech increased from low percentiles to average at age 4. The girl entered preschool at the normal age of 2.5 years, and this with only very limited special assistance. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the fact that congenital deafness no longer has to lead to abnormal hearing and abnormal speech development. It opens the debate of the ethics of not implanting a deaf child in the first few months of life.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Deafness/congenital , Deafness/therapy , Hearing , Language Development , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Audiometry, Speech , Child, Preschool , Education of Hearing Disabled , Female , Humans , Language Tests , Longitudinal Studies , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Speech Intelligibility , Treatment Outcome , Video Recording
3.
Otol Neurotol ; 25(3): 263-70, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15129103

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the onset of prelexical babbling and the audiologic outcome of 10 deaf children who received a cochlear implant (CI) before the age of 20 months. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective longitudinal observation and analysis. PATIENTS: Ten congenitally deaf infants implanted at an age between 6 and 18 months. INTERVENTION: All children received a Nucleus-24 multichannel cochlear implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 1) The onset of babbling defined as a) the first appearance of multiple articulatory movements and b) a canonical babbling ratio of.2 or higher; 2) the babbling spurt defined as a sudden increase of babbled utterances; 3) the audiologic outcome defined by the CAP score (Categories of Auditory Performance) and the results of the A[S]E (Auditory Speech Sound Evaluation). RESULTS: All children started babbling after a short interval of 1 to 4 months after activation of the device so that the onset of babbling in the youngest subjects occurred at a chronologic age comparable to that of normally hearing infants. The outcomes of the different babbling measures correlated significantly with the age of implantation: the earlier the implantation, the closer the results approached the outcomes of normally hearing infants. The children implanted in their first year of life showed a normal CAP development as early as 3 months after implantation. All CI children were able to discriminate phoneme pairs of the A[S]E immediately after the fitting of the device. CONCLUSIONS: The earlier the implantation took place, the smaller the delay was in comparison with normally hearing children with regard to the onset of prelexical babbling and with regard to auditory performance as measured by CAP.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss/therapy , Language Development , Speech Perception , Age Factors , Female , Hearing , Hearing Loss/congenital , Humans , Infant , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
4.
Otol Neurotol ; 23(6): 885-90, 2002 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12438851

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of cochlear implantation in young children in relation to the age at implantation. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of pediatric cochlear implant patients. PATIENTS: All children with congenital deafness who underwent implantation before the age of 6 years (n = 48 for the longitudinal analysis and n = 70 for the cross-sectional analysis) INTERVENTIONS: All children received a multichannel cochlear implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) score and integration into the mainstream school system. RESULTS: For all children, the CAP score increased after implantation. Implantation beyond the age of 4 years hardly ever resulted in normal CAP scores or in integration into the mainstream primary school (20 to 30% of cases). Implantation between the age of 2 and 4 years always resulted in normal CAP scores after 3 years with a 66% probability of integration into the primary school. Implantation before the age of 2 years always resulted in immediate normalization of the CAP scores, with a 90% probability of integration into the mainstream kindergarten, well before entrance into the primary school. CONCLUSION: All children with congenital deafness who underwent implantation before the age of 6 years appeared to benefit from the implant. However, these data add evidence to the importance of early implantation (before the age of 2 years). Intervention before the age of 4 years seemed to be critical to avoid irreversible auditory performance losses, and intervention before the age of 2 years seemed to be critical to achieve optimal results.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Deafness/rehabilitation , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Longitudinal Studies , Mainstreaming, Education , Male , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...