Relationships Between Functional Outcomes and Symptomatic Improvement in Atomoxetine-Treated Adult Patients with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Post Hoc Analysis of an Integrated Database.

BACKGROUND: Atomoxetine treatment is associated with improvements in functional outcomes in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), although relationships between improvements in these outcomes and reductions in ADHD symptoms have not been comprehensively investigated in adults. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess relationships between functional outcomes and ADHD symptoms (primary objective), and to assess time courses of changes in functional outcomes from baseline to weeks 10 and 24 (secondary objective). METHODS: We analyzed data pooled from seven Eli Lilly-sponsored placebo-controlled trials of atomoxetine in adults with ADHD that had Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales-Investigator Rated: Screening Version (CAARS-Inv:SV) total scores and functional outcome data at baseline and at week 10. Two trials also had these data at week 24. Patients were included in these pooled analyses if they had a CAARS-Inv:SV total score at baseline and at one or more post-baseline visits at weeks 10 or 24, or had post-baseline scores that would allow missing scores at weeks 10 or 24 to be imputed. To address the primary objective, changes in functional outcomes during treatment with atomoxetine versus placebo were assessed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and mixed-effects model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis, and correlations between score changes in CAARS-Inv:SV total and functional outcomes were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r) at weeks 10 and 24. The secondary objective was addressed using MMRM. RESULTS: At baseline, patients generally had moderately severe or worse ADHD symptoms (based on CAARS-Inv:SV total scores) and impaired functional outcomes (based on Adult ADHD Quality-of-Life [AAQoL], Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version [BRIEF-A], Sheehan Disability Scale [SDS], and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36] scores). These baseline characteristics were comparable in the atomoxetine and placebo groups. For atomoxetine versus placebo, statistically significant improvements were detected in AAQoL total and subscores at weeks 10 and 24, and in BRIEF-A Self-Report scores at week 10, but not in BRIEF-A Informant Report or SDS scores at week 10 (no BRIEF-A or SDS data were available at week 24), and not in SF-36 at weeks 10 or 24. All functional improvements were gradual. During treatment with atomoxetine, there were moderate correlations between reductions in CAARS-Inv:SV total scores and increases in AAQoL total and subscores at weeks 10 and 24 (r range -0.58 to -0.39; n = 394-545), and also with reductions in BRIEF-A Self-Report at week 10 (r = 0.49; n = 256). With placebo, moderate correlations were also found between reductions in CAARS-Inv:SV total scores and increases in AAQoL total and subscores at weeks 10 and 24 (r range -0.56 to -0.28; n = 321-542), and with reductions in BRIEF-A Self-Report at week 10 (r = 0.49; n = 271). However, correlations between changes in CAARS-Inv:SV and BRIEF-A Informant at week 10 were low for atomoxetine-treated patients (r = 0.25; n = 65), moderate with placebo (r = 0.42; n = 72), and there were low/no correlations between changes in CAARS-Inv:SV and functional outcome rating scales that are not specific to ADHD; that is, for atomoxetine-treated patients, SDS total r = 0.19 (n = 32 at week 10) and SF-36 r range - 0.20 to -0.01 (n = 51 at week 10, n = 183 at week 24). CONCLUSIONS: Atomoxetine-treated adult patients experienced improvements in functional outcomes (AAQoL and BRIEF-A Self-Report) that correlated with reductions in ADHD symptoms. Although atomoxetine improved both the ADHD symptoms and functional outcomes, the correlation between symptoms and functional outcomes was low to moderate, suggesting that they measure overlapping but different aspects of the disorder. Hence, clinicians should assess not just ADHD symptoms, but also the functional impairments.

Post Hoc Analysis of Potential Predictors of Response to Atomoxetine for the Treatment of Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder using an Integrated Database.

BACKGROUND: Responses to atomoxetine vary for individual patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, we do not know whether any factors can be used to reliably predict how individuals with ADHD will respond to treatment. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate background variables that facilitate early identification of those adults with ADHD who are likely to respond to treatment with atomoxetine. METHODS: We pooled data for atomoxetine-treated adults with ADHD from 12 clinical trials for a short-term (10-week) analysis, and from 11 clinical trials for a long-term (24-week) analysis. Patients not meeting a response definition [≥30 % reduction in Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales-Investigator Rated: Screening Version (CAARS-Inv:SV) total score and Clinical Global Impressions of ADHD Severity Scale (CGI-S) score ≤3 at endpoint], or who discontinued, were defined as non-responders. Another definition of response (≥30 % reduction in CAARS-Inv:SV total score at endpoint) was also used in these analyses; only the results with the former definition are shown in this abstract, as the same conclusions were gained with both definitions. A treatment-specified subgroup detection tool (a resampling-based ensemble tree method) was used to identify predictors of response. RESULTS: Of 1945 adults in the long-term analysis, 548 (28.2 %) were responders to atomoxetine at week 24; 65.2 % of 1397 non-responders had discontinued. Of 4524 adults in the short-term analysis, 1490 (32.9 %) were responders at week 10; 33.2 % of 1006 non-responders had discontinued. No analyzed baseline parameters (age, sex, prior stimulant use, ADHD subtype, CAARS-Inv:SV, CGI-S) were statistically significant predictors of response. Reductions in CAARS-Inv:SV total, CAARS-Inv:SV subscores, and CGI-S at week 4 in the short-term analysis, and at weeks 4 or 10 in the long-term analysis, were statistically significant predictors of response, i.e., patients with versus without these reductions early in treatment were more likely to be clinical responders at later time points. Sensitivity ranged from 28.6 to 85.9 %, and specificity ranged from 23.8 to 86.7 %. Predictors with higher sensitivity had lower specificity, and vice versa. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in CAARS-Inv:SV and CGI-S scores at weeks 4 and 10 are statistically significant predictors of response to atomoxetine at later time points in adults with ADHD. However, the predictors identified by these analyses are not reliable enough for use in clinical practice. The only currently available method to judge whether individuals with ADHD will respond to atomoxetine is to start treatment and assess the response over an extended period, sometimes longer than 10 weeks.

Safety and tolerability of atomoxetine in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adult patients: an integrated analysis of 15 clinical trials.

The safety profile of atomoxetine in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder has been studied in many clinical trials. We performed an integrated safety analysis of 15 clinical trials in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The analysis pooled patient data into three groups: acute placebo-controlled trials; long-term placebo-controlled trials; all trials. In total, 4829 adults (18-77 years, median: 36 years) were exposed to atomoxetine. Statistically significantly more atomoxetine-treated than placebo-treated patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (81.3% vs. 68.3% acute; 90.6% vs. 76.8% long term) and discontinued due to adverse events (8.9% vs. 4.0% acute; 17.9% vs. 6.3% long term). No statistically significant differences were observed in the proportion of patients experiencing serious adverse events. No previously unknown adverse events were identified. The most common adverse events included nausea, dry mouth, decreased appetite, insomnia and erectile dysfunction. Mean increases in heart rate (+5.2 beats per min) and blood pressure (systolic +2 mmHg, diastolic +1.9 mmHg) were modest. The proportion of patients experiencing clinically significant increases in blood pressure and heart rate at any time was statistically significantly higher with atomoxetine (systolic blood pressure 13-17%, diastolic blood pressure 37-40%, heart rate 42-43%) compared to placebo (systolic blood pressure 8-13%, diastolic blood pressure 29-34%, heart rate 21-26%). There was no increased risk of suicidal ideation or behaviour. Our findings confirm atomoxetine's known safety profile. From a safety perspective, atomoxetine is a useful treatment option for adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Long-term quality-of-life and functioning comparison of atomoxetine versus other standard treatment in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Psychopharmacological agents were shown to be important for improving the quality of life (QoL) of patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A short-term, 10-week study found atomoxetine (ATX) to be effective in improving QoL of ADHD patients. We compared, for the first time, long-term treatment outcomes of ATX and other early standard therapy (OEST, any pharmacological ADHD treatment except ATX) in QoL and functional impairment in pharmacologically naive children/ adolescents in a randomized, controlled, open-label study at 6 and 12 months. Patients received ATX (0.5-1.8 mg/kg per day) or OEST (mainly methylphenidate). Quality of life and functioning were assessed by the Child Health and Illness Profile-Child Edition, Parent Rating Form and the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report. Three hundred ninety-eight patients (79.4% male; mean age, 9.3 years) received study treatment. The Child Health and Illness Profile-Child Edition, Parent Rating Form achievement domain t scores significantly improved from baseline to 6 months from means of 28.0 to 37.1 for ATX and from 28.3 to 40.7 for OEST. Mean t scores at 12 months were 40.0 for ATX and 41.0 for OEST. The Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report total score improved from baseline to 6 months in both groups (ATX: mean 1.02 to 0.63; OEST: 0.96 to 0.59). Both treatments were safe with no statistically significant difference in the overall rate of adverse events. Overall, the improvements in QoL and functional impairment observed over time for ATX and OEST were meaningful and stable over the study period of 12 months. Between-group differences were small but sometimes statistically significant, providing the first-time long-term comparative symptomatic and QoL analysis between ATX and OEST.

What happens with adverse events during 6 months of treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors?

OBJECTIVE: Although adverse events are a key factor in compliance, their evolution during treatment with antidepressants is poorly documented. Therefore, the time course of adverse events during 6 months of antidepressant treatment was investigated. METHOD: 85 psychiatric outpatients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of major depressive disorder (with the exclusion of other DSM-IV Axis I disorders) were enrolled between September 2002 and March 2003 in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial with selective serotonin reup-take inhibitors (fluoxetine [N = 42] and paroxetine [N = 43]). At each visit, the presence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events were assessed systematically using the UKU Side Effect Rating Scale (UKU). General linear mixed modeling was used to investigate the predictors of the time course of adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, the number of at least moderately severe adverse events decreased with time. More severely depressed patients reported overall more (at least moderately severe) adverse events than less severely depressed patients (p = .0002), but the decrease in reported adverse events was comparable over time. Men (N = 30) and women (N = 55) reported initially the same number of at least moderately severe adverse events, but the habituation was more rapid in men (p < .0001). Completers (N = 58) and dropouts (N = 27) did not differ initially, but completers' habituation was more rapid (p = .014). The habituation of adverse events was also more rapid in recurrent than in first-episode patients but only in men (p = .0025). CONCLUSION: The time course of adverse events varies with the severity of depression, sex, completer or dropout status, and recurrent versus first-episode depression.