Role of Preoperative High-Resolution Manometry in the Identification of Patients at High Risk of Postoperative GERD Symptoms 1 Year After Sleeve Gastrectomy.

PURPOSE: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most common bariatric procedure, but it is often characterized by the onset of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). High-resolution manometry (HRM) is a useful tool to detect risk factors for GERD. The aim of this study was to evaluate preoperative manometric parameters as possible predictors of postoperative GERD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a monocentric retrospective study. We analyzed 164 patients, with preoperative esophagitis/GERD symptoms who underwent preoperative HRM and were submitted to SG (July 2020-February 2022). RESULTS: Postoperative GERD was observed in 60 patients (36.6%): 41 of them (68%) already had preoperative GERD symptoms, whereas the remaining 19 patients (32%) developed postoperative symptoms. Female patients developed postoperative GERD in a significantly higher fraction of cases as compared to male patients (82% versus 18%; p < 0.001). DCI (distal contractile integral) was identified as the only HRM parameter correlating with the presence of GERD. Patients with DCI ≤ 1623 mmHg*cm*s developed postoperative GERD in 46% of cases (n = 43/94), as compared to 24% of cases (n = 17/70) among patients with DCI > 1623 mmHg*cm*s (p = 0.005). At multivariable analysis, female sex (OR 3.402, p = 0.002), preoperative GERD symptoms (OR 2.489, p = 0.013), and DCI ≤ 1623 mmHg*s*cm (OR 0.335, p = 0.003) were identified as independent determinants of postoperative GERD. CONCLUSION: All the patients with preoperative risk factors for reflux, such as GERD symptoms or esophagitis on EGDS (esophagogastroduodenoscopy), should be considered for an HRM. Moreover, when a DCI ≤ 1623 mmHg*s*cm is found, a bariatric procedure different from SG might be considered.

Re-sleeve gastrectomy: weight loss, comorbidities and gerd evaluation in a large series with 5 years of follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has rapidly become one of the most commonly performed procedures in bariatric surgery. Weight regain and insufficient weight loss are the most common causes for surgical failure. Re-sleeve gastrectomy (ReSG) can represent an option when there is evidence of a dilated gastric tube. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to evaluate safety, efficacy and rate of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) after ReSG in one of the largest series present in literature with long-term follow up. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study design. From February 2010 to August 2018, 102 patients underwent ReSG at our Centre. We divided patients into two groups, according to the main reason for surgical failure: insufficient weight loss or progressive weight regain. RESULTS: One hundred-two patients (78 women, 24 men) with BMI 38 ± 6 kg/m2 underwent ReSG (mean age 44 years). Rate of postoperative complications was 3.9% (4/102). After a mean follow-up of 55 months, mean BMI decreased to 30,4 kg/m2 and the mean percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was 51 ± 38.6. Symptoms of GERD were present in 35/102 patients (34.3%) and the need for a new operation occurred in six patients. Forty-five patients were submitted to ReSG for progressive weight regain (group A) and 57 for insufficient weight loss (group B). No differences were found in terms of postoperative BMI and %EWL. CONCLUSION: ReSG is a feasible procedure after primary SG failure in selected patients, but its efficacy in reducing the BMI under 30 kg/m2 is still unclear. In addition, over 30% of patients suffer from long-term gastro-esophageal reflux.

Sleeve Gastrectomy with Rossetti Fundoplication Increases Lower Esophageal Sphincter Tone Preventing Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: High-Resolution Manometry Assessment.

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is associated with the long-term development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Recent studies on LSG with fundoplication showed a lower rate of postoperative GERD than LSG alone; however, there is a lack of objective instrumental data in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate whether and how fundoplication associated with Sleeve Gastrectomy affects the esophagogastric physiology. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study included 20 patients with morbid obesity, GERD, and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) hypotonia. All the patients underwent LSG with Rossetti fundoplication. High-resolution manometry was performed pre- and postoperatively. All the patients completed the 6 months follow-up. Results: The fundoplication increased LES tone in all patients. The increase in the LES tone was statistically significant (330% increase). The integrated relaxation pressure and the distal contractile integral both increased accordingly, indicating an increased esophageal effort to pass through the modified esophagogastric junction. Conclusion: Rossetti fundoplication associated with LSG increased LES tone and decreased the chance of developing long-term GERD after LSG.

Intentional Rounding versus Standard of Care for Patients Hospitalised in Internal Medicine Wards: Results from a Cluster-Randomised Nation-Based Study.

The aim of the study was to explore the effects of Intentional Rounding, a regular-based proactive patient monitoring, on falls and pressure ulcers in internal medicine units. This is a cluster-randomised controlled study, where units were assigned (1:1) to Intentional Rounding (intervention group) or Standard of Care (control group). The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of falls and new pressure ulcers. These events were considered separately as secondary endpoints, together with the number of bell calls and the evaluation of patient satisfaction. Primary analyses were carried out on the modified intention-to-treat population (hospitalisation of at least 10 days). Recruitment occurred between October 2019 and March 2020, at which time the study was prematurely closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Enrolment totalled 1822 patients at 26 sites; 779 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The intervention group had a lower risk of falls (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.78; p = 0.03). There were no statistical differences in new pressure ulcers or the cumulative incidence of both adverse events. Mean bell calls for each patient were 15.4 ± 24.1 in the intervention group and 13.7 ± 20.5 in the control group (p = 0.38). Additionally, patient satisfaction in the intervention group was almost at the maximum level. Our study supports the usefulness of Intentional Rounding in a complex and vulnerable population such as that hospitalised in internal medicine units.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with Rossetti fundoplication: long-term (5-year) follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), including erosive esophagitis, is highly prevalent in the obese population. Barrett's esophagus is the consequence of untreated GERD. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is one of the most frequently performed bariatric procedures. This study presents results after 5 years of follow-up of combined LSG and Rossetti fundoplication for the treatment of GERD, esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus in patients with morbid obesity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term results after sleeve gastrectomy with Rossetti fundoplication. SETTING: Public university hospital in Italy. METHODS: Since January 2015, more than 450 patients with obesity underwent sleeve gastrectomy with a Rossetti fundoplication procedure as part of prospective studies underway at our center performed by 4 different expert bariatric surgeons. Currently, 127 patients have a follow-up of 5 years or more. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 42.9 ± 10.3 years, and mean body mass index was 42.4 ± 6.1 kg/m2. In total, 74.8% of patients were experiencing GERD before surgery. In 29 of 127 patients (22.8%), preoperative gastroscopy showed signs of esophagitis and/or Barrett's esophagus. In particular, 23 of 127 patients (18.1%) had grade A esophagitis, 2 of 127 (1.6%) had grade B, 2 of 127 (1.6%) had grade C, and 2 of 127 (1.6%) had Barrett's esophagus. Mean operative time was 51 ± 21 minutes. No intraoperative complications or conversions were reported. A regular postoperative course was seen in 91.3% of patients. Sixty months after surgery, more than 95% of patients did not experience any reflux symptoms. Percent total weight loss at follow-up was comparable with that with sleeve gastrectomy. Endoscopic follow-up demonstrated improvement of esophagitis lesions (including Barrett's esophagus) present in the preoperative setting. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with Rossetti fundoplication is well tolerated, feasible, and safe in patients with obesity, providing adequate weight loss results and complete resolution of clinical signs of GERD. We have recorded an improvement in esophagitis lesions present at preoperative gastroscopy and complete resolution of Barrett's esophagus within 5 years of follow-up.

Advice of General Practitioner, of Surgeon, of Endocrinologist, and Self-determination: the Italian Road to Bariatric Surgery.

PURPOSE: Bariatric surgery (BS) is considered the most efficient treatment for severe obesity. International guidelines recommend multidisciplinary approach to BS (general practitioners, endocrinologists, surgeons, psychologists, or psychiatrists), and access to BS should be the final part of a protocol of treatment of obesity. However, there are indications that general practitioners (GPs) are not fully aware of the possible benefits of BS, that specialty physicians are reluctant to refer their patients to surgeons, and that patients with obesity choose self-management of their own obesity, including internet-based choices. There are no data on the pathways chosen by physicians and patients to undergo BS in the real world in Italy. METHODS: An exploratory exam was performed for 6 months in three pilot regions (Lombardy, Lazio, Campania) in twenty-three tertiary centers for the treatment of morbid obesity, to describe the real pathways to BS in Italy. RESULTS: Charts of 2686 patients (788 men and 1895 women, 75.5% in the age range 30-59 years) were evaluated by physicians and surgeons of the participating centers. A chronic condition of obesity was evident for the majority of patients, as indicated by duration of obesity, by presence of several associated medical problems, and by frequency of previous dietary attempts to weight loss. The vast majority (75.8%) patients were self-presenting or referred by bariatric surgeons, 24.2% patients referred by GPs and other specialists. Self-presenting patients were younger, more educated, more professional, and more mobile than patients referred by other physicians. Patients above the age of 40 years or with a duration of obesity greater than 10 years had a higher prevalence of all associated medical problems. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients referred to a tertiary center for the treatment of morbid obesity have a valid indication for BS. Most patients self-refer to the centers, with a minority referred by a GP or by specialists. Self-presenting patients are younger, more educated, more professional, and more mobile than patients referred by other physicians. Older patients and with a longer duration of obesity are probably representative of the conservative approach to BS, often regarded as the last resort in an endless story.

Use of fibrin glue in bariatric surgery: analysis of complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on 450 consecutive patients.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most performed surgical procedures in bariatric surgery. Staple line leak and bleeding are by far the two most feared complications after LSG. In this study, we retrospectively compared the efficacy of Fibrin Glue in preventing staple line leak and bleeding. From September 2019 to January 2020, 450 obese patients underwent elective LSG and were placed into groups with Fibrin Glue reinforcement (Group A) or without Fibrin Glue reinforcement (Group B). Primary endpoints were postoperative staple line leak and bleeding; while, secondary endpoints were reintervention rate, total operative time and mortality. Mean Body Mass Index (BMI) was 45.4 ± 7.9 kg/m2 (range: 35.1-81.8). Mean age was 43.3 ± 11.8 years (range: 18-65). No intraoperative complications or conversion to laparotomy were reported. Mean operative time was comparable between the groups (48 ± 18 min in Group A vs 48 ± 14 min in Group B; p > 0.05). No decrease in overall postoperative complications was found in Group A (5.1% vs 7.0%; p > 0.05), but after stratification according to Clavien-Dindo classification, we found a higher rate of Grade II (0.0% vs 1.6%; p < 0.05) and Grade IIIb (0.0% vs 1%; p < 0.05) complications in group B. Our study showed that Fibrin Glue as a reinforcement method during LSG is a reliable tool, without affecting the operative time of surgery and mortality. A significant reduction in complications (Clavien-Dindo grade II and grade IIIb) was observed in patients undergoing LSG with Fibrin Glue.

COVID-19 and Obesity: Is Bariatric Surgery Protective? Retrospective Analysis on 2145 Patients Undergone Bariatric-Metabolic Surgery from High Volume Center in Italy (Lombardy).

INTRODUCTION: On February 20, 2020, a severe case of pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2 was diagnosed in northern Italy (Lombardy). Some studies have identified obesity as a risk factor for severe disease in patients with COVID-19. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its severity in patients who have undergone bariatric surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During the lockdown period (until May 2020), we contacted operated patients by phone and social networks (e.g., Facebook) to maintain constant contact with them; in addition, we gave the patients a dedicated phone number at which to call us for emergencies. We produced telemedicine and educational videos for obese and bariatric patients, and we submitted a questionnaire to patients who had undergone bariatric surgery in the past. RESULTS: A total of 2145 patients (313 male; 1832 female) replied to the questionnaire. Mean presurgical BMI: 44.5 ± 6.8 kg/m2. Mean age: 44.0 ± 10.0 year. Mean BMI after surgery: 29.3 ± 5.5 kg/m2 (p < 0.05). From February to May 2020, 8.4% of patients reported that they suffered from at least one symptom among those identified as related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Thirteen patients (0.6%) tested positive for COVID-19. Six patients (0.3%) were admitted to the COVID Department, and 2 patients (0.1%) were admitted to the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: Although the reported rates of symptoms and fever were high, only 0.6% of patients tested positive for COVID-19. Among more than 2000 patients who underwent bariatric surgery analyzed in this study, only 0.1% needed ICU admission.

Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Right Colectomy with Complete Mesocolic Excision.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Literature demonstrates that colorectal cancer is nowadays one of the most common malignancies. Laparoscopy and robotic surgery are progressively gaining popularity in the treatment of colorectal tumors. Complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation have been widely adopted with encouraging results in terms of an improvement of overall survival, but some studies in the literature seem to demonstrate a higher morbidity rate. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study from 01/01/2010 to 30/04/2019 on a series of 250 patients, 155 males (62%) and 95 females (38%) who underwent right colectomy with minimally invasive approach, complete mesocolic excision, central vascular ligation, and intracorporeal anastomosis. RESULTS: No perioperative mortality occurred. Postoperative morbidity rate was 6%, including 10 cases of anastomotic leak (5%). Conversion rate was 2.5%. Mean hospital stay was 6 days (range, 4-25 days). Mean operative time was 70 minutes (range, 50-130 minutes). No cases of duodenal or pancreatic damages, no chronic pain or diarrhea, and no severe alteration of bowel function were recorded. We observed only 3 cases of transient delayed gastric emptying. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision, central vascular ligation and intracorporeal anastomosis leads to encouraging oncological mid- and long-term outcomes with low complications rates.

Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair in Bariatric Patients: the Role of Defect Size and Deferred Repair.

PURPOSE: To analyze the safety of laparoscopic ventral hernia delayed repair in bariatric patients with a composite mesh. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center observational trial analyzed all bariatric/obese patients with concomitant ventral hernia who underwent laparoscopic abdominal hernia repair before bariatric surgery (group A) and laparoscopic delayed repair after weight loss obtained by the bariatric procedure (group B). RESULTS: Group A (30 patients) had a mean BMI of 37.8 ± 5.7 kg/m2 (range: 34.0-74.2 kg/m2); group B (170 patients) had a mean BMI of 24.6 ± 4.5 kg/m2 (range 19.0-29.8 kg/m2) (p < 0.05). Mean operative time: group A, 51.7 ± 26.6 min (range 30-120); group B 38.9 ± 21.5 min (range 25-110) (p < 0.05). Average length of stay: group A, 2.0 ± 2.7 days (range 1-5) versus group B, 2.8 ± 1.9 days (range 1-4) (p > 0.5). Recurrent hernia group A 1/30 (3.3%) versus recurrent hernia group B 4/170 (2.3%) (p > 0.5). Bulging: group A, 3/30 (10.0%) versus group B, 0/170 (0%) (p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates the safety of performing LDR in patient candidates for bariatric surgery in cases of a large abdominal hernia (W2-W3) with a low risk of incarceration or an asymptomatic abdominal hernia. In the case of a small abdominal hernia (W1) or strongly symptomatic abdominal hernia, repair before bariatric surgery, along with subsequent bariatric surgery and any revision of the abdominal wall surgery with weight loss, is preferable.

Modified laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with Rossetti antireflux fundoplication: results after 220 procedures with 24-month follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), including erosive esophagitis, is highly prevalent in the obese population. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most frequently performed bariatric procedures. The relationship between LSG and GERD has gained increasing attention. This retrospective study aimed to assess the effectiveness of combined LSG and modified Rossetti antireflux fundoplication for the treatment of GERD on morbidly obese patients after bariatric surgery. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness, on morbid obese patients, of combined SG and Rossetti fundoplication for the treatment of GERD in obese patients. SETTING: Public Hospital, Italy. METHODS: From January 2015 to May 2018, 220 obese patients (167 female; 53 male) underwent LSG and modified Rossetti antireflux fundoplication procedure, performed by 4 different expert bariatric surgeons. Data have been collected in an Excel file and processed by XLStat to perform statistical analyses. We analyzed short-term complications and medium-term results with 24-month follow-up in terms of weight loss, remission of co-morbidities, and resolution of GERD. RESULTS: Mean BMI was 42.58 ± 5.93 kg/m2 (range, 31.70-63.16). Patients suffering from GERD before surgery were 137 of 220 (62.3%). No intraoperative complications or conversion were reported. Regular postoperative course was recorded in 90% of patients (198 of 220 patients). Gastric perforation has always occurred on the fundoplicated portion of the stomach. This perforation, which is different from the well-known post-LSG gastric fistula, may be because of incorrect gastric fundus manipulation. Rate of reoperation was 14 of 220 (6.4%). A good sense of repletion without episodes of vomiting, nausea, or dysphagia was reported in 95% of the analyzed patients. Of patients, 98.5% did not suffer from reflux symptoms and did not take proton pump inhibitors. A decrease in BMI and percent of total weight loss at follow-up were comparable with LSG. Endoscopic follow-up is still ongoing. Improvement in esophagitis was observed in 63 of 65 (96.92%) patients and all 4 patients shows improvement in Barrett's esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: LSG and modified Rossetti antireflux fundoplication procedure is a tolerated and feasible procedure in obese patients, with good postoperative weight loss results and improvement in GERD.

Management of 69 Gastric Leakages after 4294 Consecutive Sleeve: The Experience of a High Volume Bariatric Center.

PURPOSE: To propose an algorithm of treatment for leakage after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-nine patients who developed gastric leakage out of 4294 patients who underwent LSG from 2010 to 2018 were considered in this study. Patients' outcomes in terms of incidence of resolution and time to leakage resolution were compared by leakage characteristics and type of treatment. Three patients were lost to follow up. RESULTS: Leakage occurred in a median of 6 days from surgery, and for majority of patients (80.3%), it was in the upper part of the sleeve. The median dimension of leakage was 6.5 mm. Low level leakage resulted in a lower time of resolution (p < 0.001). Patients with clinical leakage were treated with surgery or endoscopic placement of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS). The median time of leakage resolution was 42 days. The hospitalization time for SEMS was shorter with a 68.3% of complete resolution compared with the 29.4% of surgery. In patients with subclinical and small leakage, a conservative treatment was successful in 87.5%. Overall 39.4% of patients needed a second line treatment after that the first failed. CONCLUSION: Leakage could be treated conservatively if subclinical and < 5 mm. Surgery is mandatory if a perigastric collection is present or an organ lesion is suspected. SEMS seems to be the best option to treat high level leakage.

Laparoscopic Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective monocentric study was to evaluate results and recurrence rate with long-term follow-up after laparoscopic incisional/ventral hernia repair. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, observational trial, collecting data from patients who underwent laparoscopic incisional/ventral abdominal hernia repair using the open intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique and a single mesh type. All patients signed an informed consent form before surgery. RESULTS: A total of 1,029 patients were included. The median surgery time was 40 min (range 30-55) and the median length of hospital stay was 2 d (range 2-3). Intraoperative complications occurred in two of 1,029 patients (0.19%), whereas early postoperative surgical complications (within 30 d) occurred in 50 patients (4.86%). Postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification were as follows: I, 3.30% (34 of 1,029); II, 0.97% (10 of 1,029); IIIB, 0.58% (six of 1,029); IV, 0.00% (none of 1,029); and V, 0.00% (none of 1,029). During follow-up, bulging mesh was diagnosed in 58 of 1,029 patients (5.6%), and hernia recurred in 40 of 1,029 patients (3.9%). A mesh overlap equal to or greater than 4 cm appeared to be a significant protective factor for hernia recurrence (P < .001); a mesh overlap equal or greater than 5 cm appeared to be a significant protective factor for bulging (P < .001), whereas the use of resorbable fixing devices was a significant risk factor for hernia recurrence (odds ratio, 111.53, P < .001, 95% confidence interval, 21.53-577.67). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that laparoscopic repair of ventral/incisional abdominal wall hernias is a safe, effective, and reproducible procedure. Identified risk factors for recurrence are an overlap of less than 4 cm and the use of resorbable fixation means.

Laparoscopic Surgery of Gastric Cancer with D2 Lymphadenectomy and Omentum Preservation: Our 10 Years Experience.

Introduction: The debate is still open about laparoscopic treatment of gastric cancer. The aim of this retrospective study is to analyze our short-, medium-, and long-term surgical and oncological results in laparoscopic treatment of gastric cancer with D2 lymphadenectomy and omentum preservation. Materials and Methods: From January 2010 to June 2018, after >150 surgical procedures for gastric cancer performed by minimally invasive approach, we performed 100 laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomies and 38 total gastrectomies, both for early gastric cancer (EGC) and advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We always made a D2 lymphadenectomy or higher. As often as possible, we performed omentum-preserving technique. Primary outcomes analyzed included incidence of medical and surgical complications. Secondary outcomes analyzed were survival probability and incidence of relapse. Every patient read and signed informed consent before surgery. Results: Mean operative time: 2.4 ± 0.7 hours (range 1.2-4.7 hours). Rate of conversions: 14.5% (20/138); intraoperative complications: 1.4% (2/138) and positive resection margins: 6.5% (9/138). Overall incidence of duodenal fistula: 3.6% (5/138). Rate of reoperation was 7.3% (10/138). Postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification: I 3.6% (5/138); II 13.0% (18/138); III 5.8% (8/138); III B 0.7% (1/138); V 1.4% (2/138). Overall survival with 60 months follow-up was 58%. Overall 60 months incidence of relapse was 44%. Patients with omentum preservation had a lower incidence of relapse than patients with omentectomy (40% versus 57% P = .002). Conclusions: Laparoscopic treatment of gastric cancer with D2 lymphadenectomy and omentum preservation is safe and feasible, both for EGC and for AGC. Although this study has limitations, omentum-preserving technique was associated with a statistically lower recurrence rate.

Modified Sleeve Gastrectomy Combined with Laparoscopic Rossetti Fundoplication and Vascularization Assessment with Indocyanine Green.

AIM: Morbid obesity is a key risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux; the aim of this study is to describe the technique of modified laparoscopic Rossetti fundoplication to treat morbid obesity related to GERD. METHODS: This is a video/dynamic manuscript on operative technique. We present the case of a 38-year-old patient referred to our institution for morbid obesity (BMI 43 kg/m2) related to GERD symptoms with grade A esophagitis at the preoperative upper gastro intestinal endoscopy and in daily therapy with PPI since years. The patient was scheduled for a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with Rossetti fundoplication. RESULTS: Intraoperative and postoperative course were uneventful. One year later, the BMI is 27.9 kg/m2 and at clinical and endoscopic follow-up demonstrates absence of esophagitis and any PPI therapy is needed. CONCLUSION: The modified sleeve gastrectomy combined with laparoscopic Rossetti fundoplication seems to be a safe, effective procedure and a suitable alternative to gastric bypass in obese patients with GERD.

Laparoscopic One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with Braun Anastomosis: What's Better?

Background and Aims: Although laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) is a promising bariatric procedure, a large number of surgeons have strong objections mainly because of risk of bile reflux, marginal ulceration, malnutrition, and long-term risk of gastric and esophageal cancer. Lateral enteroenterostomy placed distally to a gastrojejunal anastomosis shows efficacy in preventing bile reflux after gastric resection and gastrojejunal anastomosis, but at present its efficacy in a bariatric surgery context has not been evaluated. Patients and Methods: From January 2013 to December 2018, 100 patients have been admitted to our department to be treated by performing LOAGB. Patients have been divided into two groups on the basis of the indications to this surgical procedure; Group A: presence of de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or severe esophagitis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, with or without weight regain; Group B: LOAGB as primary procedure. Another group of 30 patients (Group C) underwent LOAGB with Braun anastomosis as primary bariatric surgical procedure for morbid obesity. We have conducted a retrospective analysis of the surgical outcomes in terms of perioperative mortality, short-, mid-, and long-term postoperative complications and weight loss. Results: Group A: 50 patients; incidence of postoperative GERD, esophagitis, or esophageal ulcers was 26% (13 cases). All these patients have been successfully treated by performing Braun anastomosis. Group B: 20 patients; incidence of de novo reflux was 25% (5 cases); Braun anastomosis was performed with complete resolution of signs and symptoms in all cases. Group C: 30 patients; no cases of de novo reflux, esophagitis, or anastomotic ulcers occurred. Conclusion: Braun anastomosis seems to be a useful surgical tool to prevent the onset of de novo reflux, esophagitis, and anastomotic ulcers.