Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Haematol ; 95(5): 472-9, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25598286

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most central venous catheter (CVC)-related deep vein thromboses (DVT) are asymptomatic and their incidence and clinical relevance are still under debate. Data on CVC-related fibrin sheaths are scarce. We investigated the incidence of asymptomatic DVT and fibrin sheaths in cancer patients with long-term CVC implantation who underwent Doppler ultrasound surveillance at 1, 6, and 12 months after implantation. Effects of low-weight molecular heparin (LWMH) therapy on DVT and fibrin sheaths were also analyzed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study was performed on a large cohort (n = 400) of patients with cancer aged >18 requiring long-term CVC implantation for chemotherapy infusion. CVC was implanted by a trained qualified staff, according to standardized protocol in a specific surgery. Patients underwent ultrasound examination at 1 and 6 months after CVC implantation to detect 'early' (1 month) and 'late' (6 months) asymptomatic DVT or fibrin sheaths incidence. Sixty-nine patients underwent US examination also 12 months after CVC implantation. RESULTS: The incidence of CVC-related thrombosis was 0.10 events per 1000 catheter days. Anticoagulation therapy with LWMH resolved 50% of DVT, but no CVC needed removing. Incidence of new onset fibrin sheaths was 0.71 events per 1000 catheter days. Fibrin sheaths resolution occurred independently of LWMH therapy. DISCUSSION: The incidence of asymptomatic DVT in our patients with long-term CVC is very low and does not represent per se an indication for removal of functioning CVC in patients with cancer. Fibrin sheaths are frequent (13%) and never associated with CVC dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic DVT and fibrin sheaths do not represent per se an indication for removal of functioning CVC in cancer patients who need central vein access.


Subject(s)
Fibrin/metabolism , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms/metabolism , Neoplasms/therapy , Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging , Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis/epidemiology , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color , Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis/etiology , Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis/metabolism
2.
J Vasc Access ; 15(5): 391-5, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25041921

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Totally implantable venous access devices (Ports) represent the mainstay for infusion therapy in patients undergoing chemotherapy, total parenteral nutrition and/or long-term antibiotic treatment. Amongst mechanical complications, lesions of the catheter wall represent a rare but potentially severe condition. We report our experience with the accidental detection of catheter ruptures in a series of ports removed for complication or for end of use. METHODS: All ports removed from January 2011 to June 2013 were considered. All removed ports had been inserted according to a standardized protocol including ultrasound-guided percutaneous venipuncture (out-of-plane or in-plane approaches) and electrocardiogram-guided positioning of the tip. Once removed, each catheter was checked by inspection and saline instillation in order to evaluate the integrity of the device itself and rule out possible ruptures. RESULTS: In over 338 removed ports, 12 Groshong catheters out of 65 (18.5%) had evidence of partial rupture of the catheter wall. Amongst considered variables, "out-of-plane" approach and type of port (silicon, closed tip with Groshong valve) were the only ones significantly associated with catheter ruptures (p=0.0003 and 0.0008, respectively). We could detect no evidence of rupture in any silicon open-ended catheter (Celsite ports) or in any catheter inserted by "in-plane" approach to the vein. CONCLUSIONS: The actual advantage of using port connected with Groshong silicon catheters should be questioned, since apparently they are more fragile than standard catheters. Furthermore, ultrasound-guided "out-of-plane" puncture of the internal jugular vein should be discouraged.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Catheters, Indwelling , Central Venous Catheters , Equipment Failure , Aged , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Device Removal/methods , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Incidental Findings , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Interventional
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...