Oral motor function in obesity.

BACKGROUND: Obese individuals may have impaired oral sensory functioning and abnormal oral motor function, a consequence of fat deposition in muscles. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the oral motor function in obese individuals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three observational cross-sectional studies were performed. In total, 140 participants were evaluated: (1) orofacial myofunctional evaluation (OMES) was performed in 26 obese and 26 control subjects; (2) time taken for suction of 50 ml of water through straws of 3 mm and 6 mm of diameter was measured in 30 obese and 30 control subjects; (3) the oral phase of swallowing of 5 ml moderately thick and 5 ml extremely thick boluses was analysed by videofluoroscopy in 14 obese and 14 control subjects. Obese and non-obese control subjects had body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 and <30 kg/m2 , respectively. RESULTS: Obese subjects had worse oral myofunctional evaluation scores in posture/appearance (lips, jaw, cheeks, tongue and hard palate), in mobility (lips, tongue, jaw and cheeks) and in breathing, deglutition and mastication functions (p ≤ .020). The OMES total score was 73.5 ± 5.5 in obese and 92.8 ± 3.7 in controls subjects (p < .001). There was no difference between the groups in the time taken for 50 ml of water suction through the 3-mm- or 6-mm-diameter straw. Videofluoroscopic evaluation of the bolus swallowed demonstrated a longer oral preparation time in obese individuals for both boluses (p ≤ .040) and no difference in oral transit time (p ≥ .140). CONCLUSION: A moderate change in oral motor function was observed in obese individuals with BMI ≥40 kg/m2 .

Changes in jaw and neck muscle coactivation and coordination in patients with chronic painful TMD disk displacement with reduction during chewing.

The treatment of a complex temporomandibular disorder (TMD), such as disk displacement with reduction (DDR) associated with arthralgia and myalgia, may depends on understanding the impairments in muscle function. The aim of this study was to investigate the behavior of the anterior temporalis, masseter and sternocleidomastoid muscles in the time and frequency domains during chewing in patients with chronic painful TMD-DDR using electromyographic (EMG) analysis. Thirty-three patients who met the diagnostic criteria for TMD and 32 volunteers without TMD (control group) underwent clinical examination, chewing pattern classification and EMG analysis. For the EMG analyses, the side of habitual unilateral chewing, as determined by the chewing pattern classification, was selected for recording; in cases of bilateral chewing, the recording side was randomly selected. The EMG-EMG coherence function and EMG-EMG transfer function (gain and phase) values were obtained at the first chewing frequency peak, and the working-side masseter signal was used as a reference in the analyses of the other muscles. Compared to the control group, the TMD group showed a longer chewing stroke duration (P = 0.01) as well as changes in the coactivation and coordination strategies of the jaw muscles, evidenced by greater relative energy expenditure (P< 0.01) and impaired differential recruitment (P< 0.05) and coherence (P< 0.01). Delays in peak and temporal asynchrony occurred in the jaw and neck muscles (P< 0.05). Patients with chronic painful TMD-DDR during chewing presented changes in the jaw and neck muscles, with more compromised function of the former, which are specific to chewing.

Orofacial Motor Functions and Temporomandibular Disorders in Patients With Sjögren's Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Sjögren's syndrome (SS) induces difficulty in chewing and swallowing due to low salivary flow. However, these symptoms may be associated with other factors, such as orofacial myofunctional disorders and temporomandibular disorder (TMD), which have not been comprehensively assessed in this population. The aims of this study were to investigate orofacial muscles and functions as well as the presence of TMD in patients with SS compared with a group without SS and to analyze whether the patients' experience of limitations in orofacial functioning is associated with the orofacial functional status and muscle pain related to TMD. METHODS: Women with SS based on the 2002 American-European Consensus Group criteria and volunteers paired by age and sex were compared. The examinations included the orofacial myofunctional evaluation with scores (OMES) protocol, tongue and lip strength measures, and electromyography of the masticatory muscles. TMD investigations included clinical examination, self-report of symptoms, and assessment according to the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale. RESULTS: Patients with SS present with impaired muscle and orofacial functions based on lower scores of all categories of OMES (P < 0.0001), tongue strength (P = 0.0003-0.0004), and masticatory muscle activity (P = 0.0002-0.007), as well as worse TMD signs and symptoms (P < 0.05) and jaw functional limitation (P < 0.0001-0.0003). CONCLUSION: Patients' experiences with limitation in mastication and swallowing were associated with orofacial myofunctional status and muscle pain related to TMD. Those disorders should be monitored along with disease control and must be addressed in the clinical evaluation to prevent nutritional and metabolic comorbidities in patients with SS.

Tongue strength, masticatory and swallowing dysfunction in patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder.

BACKGROUND: The possible factors related to functional impairment and limitations in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) still need to be clarified because recovery of orofacial functions is a goal of their treatment. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether chronic TMD patients had any changes in tongue strength, besides the difficulty in chewing and orofacial functional impairment, compared to a control group. Moreover, to examine whether tongue strength, chewing difficulties, and orofacial functions were associated. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with chronic TMD according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) and volunteers without TMD (control group) were compared. Strength measures were obtained using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) during tongue protrusion (TPS) and swallowing of saliva (SS) tasks. A scale was used to investigate self-reported chewing difficulties, and the orofacial muscles and functions were evaluated using the orofacial myofunctional evaluation with scores protocol (OMES). RESULTS: Compared to the control group, TMD patients showed reduced TPS and SS, higher difficulty in chewing and worse myofunctional orofacial conditions. Tongue strength was correlated with mastication and swallowing behaviors, as well as with general myofunctional status. Chewing difficulty increased with decreasing tongue strength and with worsening of orofacial muscles and functions. CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic TMD showed reduced tongue strength and worse masticatory and swallowing functions, and these aspects were interrelated. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present results contribute additional evidence regarding the impairment of orofacial muscles other than jaw elevator muscles in patients with chronic TMD.

Swallowing changes related to chronic temporomandibular disorders.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether chronic temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients showed any changes in swallowing compared to a control group. Moreover, it was examined whether swallowing variables and a valid clinic measure of orofacial myofunctional status were associated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with chronic TMD, diagnosed with disc displacement with reduction (DDR) and pain, according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD), and 27 healthy volunteers (control group) were compared. Surface electromyography (EMG) of the temporalis, masseter, sternocleidomastoid, and suprahyoid muscles was performed during swallowing tasks of thin liquid (10 and 15 mL) and spontaneous saliva. Data were normalized. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, TMD patients showed a prolonged duration of swallowing for liquid and saliva and required a longer time to reach the activity peak and half the integral. While the overall mean value of the relative peaks was similar for the groups, the suprahyoid peak was significantly lower in the TMD group during swallowing of liquid. Moreover, TMD patients recruited the jaw elevator muscles proportionally more than controls. The orofacial myofunctional status was moderately correlated with EMG parameters. CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic TMD showed temporal prolongation and changes in the relative activity of the muscles during the swallowing tasks. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present results contribute additional evidence regarding the reorganization of muscle activity in patients with chronic TMD.

Reorganization of muscle activity in patients with chronic temporomandibular disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether reorganization of muscle activity occurs in patients with chronic temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and, if so, how it is affected by symptomatology severity. METHODS: Surface electromyography (sEMG) of masticatory muscles was made in 30 chronic TMD patients, diagnosed with disc displacement with reduction (DDR) and pain. Two 15-patient subgroups, with moderate (TMDmo) and severe (TMDse) signs and symptoms, were compared with a control group of 15 healthy subjects matched by age. The experimental tasks were: a 5s inter-arch maximum voluntary clench (MVC); right and left 15s unilateral gum chewing tests. Standardized sEMG indices characterizing masseter and temporalis muscles activity were calculated, and a comprehensive functional index (FI) was introduced to quantitatively summarize subjects' overall performance. Mastication was also clinically evaluated. RESULTS: During MVC, TMDse patients had a significantly larger asymmetry of temporalis muscles contraction. Both TMD groups showed reduced coordination between masseter and temporalis muscles' maximal contraction, and their muscular activity distribution shifted significantly from masseter to temporalis muscles. During chewing, TMDse patients recruited the balancing side muscles proportionally more than controls, specifically the masseter muscle. When comparing right and left side chewing, the muscles' recruitment pattern resulted less symmetric in TMD patients, especially in TMDse. Overall, the functional index of both TMDmo and TMDse patients was significantly lower than that obtained by controls. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic TMD patients, specifically those with severe symptomatology, showed a reorganized activity, mainly resulting in worse functional performances.

Effects of oral motor exercises and laser therapy on chronic temporomandibular disorders: a randomized study with follow-up.

This study investigated the efficacy of combining low-level laser therapy (LLLT) with oral motor exercises (OM-exercises) for rehabilitation of patients with chronic temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Eighty-two patients with chronic TMD and 20 healthy subjects (control group) participated in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups: GI (LLLT + OM exercises), GII (orofacial myofunctional therapy-OMT-which contains pain relief strategies and OM-exercises), and GIII (LLLT placebo + OM-exercises) and GIV (LLLT). LLLT (AsGaAl; 780-nm wavelength; average power of 60 mW, 40 s, and 60 ± 1.0 J/cm²) was used to promote analgesia, while OM-exercises were used to reestablish the orofacial functions. Evaluations at baseline (T1), after treatment immediate (T2), and at follow-up (T3) were muscle and joint tenderness to palpation, TMD severity, and orofacial myofunctional status. There was a significant improvement in outcome measures in all treated groups with stability at follow-up (Friedman test, P < 0.05), but GIV did not show difference in orofacial functions after LLLT (P > 0.05). Intergroup comparisons showed that all treated groups had no difference in tenderness to palpation of temporal muscle compared to GC at follow-up (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.01). Moreover, GI, GII, and GIII showed no difference from GC in orofacial functional condition (T2 and T3) while they differed significantly from GIV (P < 0.01). In conclusion, LLLT combined with OM-exercises was more effective in promoting TMD rehabilitation than LLLT alone was. Similar treatment results were verified with the OMT protocol.

Impaired orofacial motor functions on chronic temporomandibular disorders.

Because temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) rehabilitation continues to be a challenge, a more comprehensive picture of the orofacial functions in patients with chronic pain is required. This study assessed the orofacial functions, including surface electromyography (EMG) of dynamic rhythmic activities, in patients with moderate-severe signs and symptoms of chronic TMD. It was hypothesized that orofacial motor control differs between patients with moderate-severe chronic TMD and healthy subjects. Seventy-six subjects (46 with TMD and 30 control) answered questionnaires of severity of TMD and chewing difficulties. Orofacial functions and EMG during chewing were assessed. Standardized EMG indices were obtained by quantitative analysis of the differential EMG signals of the paired masseter and temporal muscles, and used to describe muscular action during chewing. TMD patients showed significant greater difficulty in chewing; worse orofacial scores; longer time for free mastication; a less accurate recruitment of the muscles on the working and balancing sides, reduced symmetrical mastication index (SMI) and increased standardized activity during EMG test than healthy subjects. SMI, TMD severity and orofacial myofunctional scores were correlated (P<0.01). Impaired orofacial functions and increased activity of the muscles of balancing sides during unilateral chewing characterized the altered orofacial motor control in patients with moderate-severe chronic TMD. Implications for rehabilitation are discussed.

Mandibular kinematics and masticatory muscles EMG in patients with short lasting TMD of mild-moderate severity.

Mandibular kinematic and standardized surface electromyography (sEMG) characteristics of masticatory muscles of subjects with short lasting TMD of mild-moderate severity were examined. Volunteers were submitted to clinical examination and questionnaire of severity. Ten subjects with TMD (age 27.3years, SD 7.8) and 10 control subjects without TMD, matched by age, were selected. Mandibular movements were recorded during free maximum mouth opening and closing (O-C) and unilateral, left and right, gum chewing. sEMG of the masseter and temporal muscles was performed during maximum teeth clenching either on cotton rolls or in intercuspal position, and during gum chewing. sEMG indices were obtained. Subjects with TMD, relative to control subjects, had lower relative mandibular rotation at the end of mouth opening, larger mean number of intersection between interincisal O-C paths during mastication and smaller asymmetry between working and balancing side, with participation beyond the expected of the contralateral muscles (P<0.05, t-test). Overall, TMD subjects showed similarities with the control subjects in several kinematic parameters and the EMG indices of the static test, although some changes in the mastication were observed.

Treatment for TMD with occlusal splint and electromyographic control: application of the FARC protocol in a Brazilian population.

The purpose of this study was to apply Functional Anatomy Research Center (FARC) Protocol of TMD treatment, which includes the use of a specific type of mandibular occlusal splint, adjusted based on the electromyographic index, in a group of 15 patients with disc displacement, classified according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) and then analyzing the results compared with the control group. The clinical evaluations were completed both before and after the treatment. Electromyographic (EMG) data was collected and recorded on the day the splint was inserted (visit 1), after one week (visit 2) and after five weeks of treatment (visit 3). The control group consisted of 15 asymptomatic subjects, according to the same diagnostic criteria (RDC/TMD), who were submitted to the same evaluations with the same interval periods as the treatment group. Immediately after splint adjustment, masseter muscle symmetry and total muscular activity were significantly different with than without the splint (p < 0.05), showing an increased neuromuscular coordination. After treatment, significant variations (p < .05) were found in mouth opening and in pain remission. There were no significant differences among the three sessions, either with or without the splint. There were significant differences between the TMD and control groups for all analyzed indices of muscular symmetry, activity and torque, with the exception of total muscular activity. The use of the splint promoted balance of the EMG activities during its use, relieving symptoms. EMG parameters identified neuromuscular imbalance, and allowed an objective analysis of different phases of TMD treatment, differentiating individuals with TMD from the asymptomatic subjects.

Electromyographic indices, orofacial myofunctional status and temporomandibular disorders severity: A correlation study.

This study examined whether there is an association between surface electromyography (EMG) of masticatory muscles, orofacial myofunction status and temporomandibular disorder (TMD) severity scores. Forty-two women with TMD (mean 30 years, SD 8) and 18 healthy women (mean 26 years, SD 6) were examined. According to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD), all patients had myogenous disorders plus disk displacements with reduction. Surface EMG of masseter and temporal muscles was performed during maximum teeth clenching either on cotton rolls or in intercuspal position. Standardized EMG indices were obtained. Validated protocols were used to determine the perception severity of TMD and to assess orofacial myofunctional status. TMD patients showed more asymmetry between right and left muscle pairs, and more unbalanced contractile activities of contralateral masseter and temporal muscles (p<0.05, t-test), worse orofacial myofunction status and higher TMD severity scores (p<0.05, Mann-Whitney test) than healthy subjects. Spearman coefficient revealed significant correlations between EMG indices, orofacial myofunctional status and TMD severity (p<0.05). In conclusion, these methods will provide useful information for TMD diagnosis and future therapeutic planning.

Effects of orofacial myofunctional therapy on temporomandibular disorders.

The objectives of the current study were to analyze the effects of orofacial myofunctional therapy (OMT) on the treatment of subjects with associated articular and muscular temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Thirty subjects with associated articular and muscular TMD, according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC/TMD), were randomly divided into groups: 10 were treated with OMT (T group), 10 with an occlusal splint (OS group), and 10 untreated control group with TMD (SC). Ten subjects without TMD represented the asymptomatic group (AC). All subjects had a clinical examination and were interviewed to determine Helkimo's Indexes (Di and Ai), the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms, and orofacial myofunctional evaluation. During the diagnostic phase, there were significant differences between groups T and AC. There were no significant differences between group T and OC and SC groups. During the final phase, groups T and OS presented significant improvement, however, the group T presented better results and differed significantly from group OS regarding the number of subjects classified as Aill; the severity of muscular pain and TMJ pain; the frequency of headache and the muscles and stomatognathic functions. The group T differed significantly from the SC group but no longer differed significantly from the AC group. OMT favored a significant reduction of pain sensitivity to palpation of all muscles studied but not for the TMJs; an increased measure of mandibular range of motion; reduced Helkimo's Di and Ai scores; reduced frequency and severity of signs and symptoms; and increased scores for orofacial myofunctional conditions.

Expanded protocol of orofacial myofunctional evaluation with scores: Validity and reliability.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical evaluation of the stomatognathic system is indispensable for the diagnosis of orofacial myofunctional disorders. In order to obtain a more precise diagnosis, the protocol of orofacial myofunctional evaluation with scores (OMES protocol) (Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 72 (2008) 367-375) was expanded in terms of number of items and scale amplitude. The proposal of this study is to describe the expanded OMES protocol (OMES-E) for the evaluation of children. Validity of the protocol, reliability of the examiners and agreement between them were analyzed, as also were the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the instrument. METHODS: The sample consisted of videorecorded images of 50 children, 25 boys (mean age=8.4 years, SD=1.8) and 25 girls (mean age=8.2 years, SD=1.7) selected at random from 200 samples. Three speech therapists prepared for orofacial myofunctional evaluation participated as examiners (E). The OMES and OMES-E protocols were used for evaluation on different days. E1 evaluated all images, E2 analyzed children with recordings from 1 to 25 and E3 analyzed children with recordings from 26 to 50. The validity of OMES-E was analyzed by comparing the instrument to the OMES protocol using the Pearson correlation test complemented with the split-half reliability test (p<0.05). The linear weighted Kappa coefficient of agreement (Kw'), the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values and the prevalence of OMD were calculated. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant correlation between the OMES and OMES-E protocols (0.79>r<0.94, p<0.01) and a significant test-retest correlation with the OMES-E (0.75>r<0.86, p<0.01), with a reliability range of 0.86-0.93. The correlation and reliability coefficients between examiners were: E1×E2 (r=0.74, 0.84), E1×E3 (r=0.70, 0.83) (p<0.01). Kw' coefficients with moderate and good strength predominated. The OMES-E protocol presented mean sensitivity=0.91, specificity=0.77, positive predictive value=0.87 and negative predictive value=0.85. The mean prevalence of OMD was 0.58. CONCLUSION: The OMES-E protocol is valid and reliable for orofacial myofunctional evaluation.

Masticatory muscle activity in children with a skeletal or dentoalveolar open bite.

SUMMARY: The aim of this study was to compare the electromyographic (EMG) characteristics of masticatory muscles in children with either a skeletal or dentoalveolar open bite, compared with a control group (CG). Forty-five children (31 boys and 14 girls), aged 6-11 years, were included in the study, 15 with a skeletal anterior open bite (SAOB), 15 with a dentoalveolar anterior open bite (DAOB), and 15 with a normal occlusion (CG), defined by clinical evaluation and lateral cephalograms. EMG recordings of the temporal and masseter muscles were performed under maximal voluntary clenching and during chewing. Analysis of variance was used for inter-group analysis, followed by the Tukey post hoc test. A Student's t-test for paired data was used for intra-group analysis. There were statistically significant differences among the three groups (P < 0.05), with the mean EMG being highest in the CG and lowest in children with a SAOB. The percentage EMG activity during chewing in relation to that during maximal voluntary clenching was more than 100 per cent in the SAOB group. The CG and DAOB groups presented higher EMG activity during clenching compared with chewing (P < 0.001), as well as a greater difference between tasks. In the SAOB group, the neuromuscular system appeared to have a lower capacity to produce EMG activity according to the task, while that in the DAOB group suggests that their functional capacity during growth should also be carefully observed.

Orofacial myofunctional disorder in subjects with temporomandibular disorder.

To determine the frequency and degree of orofacial myofunctional disorder (OMD) in a sample of patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD), the dental records of 240 patients with a diagnosis of TMD were reviewed. Mean patient age and mean TMD duration, gender frequency, complaints, and signs and symptoms were calculated. The results showed that the sample studied was quite characteristic of a TMD group. The presence of the following signs/symptoms was significant: muscular pain, TMJ pain, joint noise, at least one otologic symptom, headache, and neck and shoulder pain. Most subjects presented some degree of OMD, with grade high prevailing over grade low. The importance of evaluating the stomatognathic structures and functions during the clinical examination of patients with TMD is emphasized.

Otologic symptoms of temporomandibular disorder and effect of orofacial myofunctional therapy.

The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of otologic symptoms and their relationship to orofacial signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder (TMD), and the effect of orofacial myofunctional therapy. The study was conducted on eight asymptomatic subjects (Group C) and 20 subjects with articular TMD, randomly distributed over two groups: one treated using orofacial myofunctional therapy (OMT Group) and a control group with TMD (Group CTMD). Patient selection was based upon the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD). All subjects submitted to a clinical examination with self-reporting of symptom severity, and to orofacial myofunctional and electromyographic evaluation at diagnosis and again, at the end of the study. Correlations were calculated using the Pearson test and inter- and intragroup comparisons were made (p < 0.05). In the diagnosis phase, subjects with TMD reported earache (65%), tinnitus (60%), ear fullness (90%), and 25% of the asymptomatic subjects reported tinnitus. The otologic symptoms were correlated with tenderness to palpation of the temporomandibular muscles and joints and with orofacial symptoms. Only the OMT group showed a reduction of otologic and orofacial symptoms, of tenderness to palpation and of the asymmetric index between muscles. OMT may help with muscle coordination and a remission of TMD symptoms.

Comparison of upper and lower lip muscle activity between stutterers and fluent speakers.

OBJECTIVE: There is a widespread clinical view that stuttering is associated with high levels of muscles activity. The proposal of this research was to compare stutterers and fluent speakers with respect to the electromyographic activity of the upper and lower lip muscles. METHODS: Ten individuals who stutter and 10 fluent speakers (control group) paired by gender and age were studied (mean age: 13.4 years). Groups were defined by the speech sample analysis of the ABFW-Language Test. A K6-I EMG (Myo-tronics Co., Seattle, WA, USA) with double disposable silver electrodes (Duotrodes, Myo-tronics Co., Seattle, WA) being used in order to analyze lip muscle activity. The clinical conditions investigated were movements during speech, orofacial non-speech tasks, and rest. Electromyographic data were normalized by lip pursing activity. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used for the comparison of speech fluency profile, and the Student t-test for independent samples for group comparison regarding electromyographic data. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between groups regarding speech fluency profile and upper lip activity in the following conditions: lip lateralization to the right and to the left and rest before exercises (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between groups regarding lower lip activity (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The EMG activity of the upper lip muscle in the group with stuttering was significantly lower than in the control group in some of the clinical conditions analyzed. There was no significant difference between groups regarding the lower lip muscle. The subjects who stutter did not present higher levels of muscle activity in lip muscles than fluent speakers.

The effects of orofacial myofunctional therapy combined with an occlusal splint on signs and symptoms in a man with TMD-hypermobility: case study.

Exercise therapy has been indicated for the treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD), but few reports are available about the effect of orofacial myofunctional therapy, which includes working with stomatognathic functions, in patients with TMD. A 49-year-old man with a diagnosis of TMD-hypermobility and orofacial myofunctional disorders received combined treatment with orofacial myofunctional therapy and an occlusal splint. Clinical evaluation and the scale of symptom severity after 9 treatment sessions and during follow-up compared to the phase before treatment suggested that treatment was of great benefit. We conclude that the combination of orofacial myofunctional therapy and an occlusal splint can be beneficial for patients with TMD-hypermobility. However, since this was a single case, further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

A preliminary protocol for multi-professional centers for the determination of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders.

The objective of the present study was to test a protocol for the quantification of the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) according to patient perception during two phases of investigation. The protocol was developed based on the signs and symptoms most frequently reported in the literature and on the circumstances in which they produce discomfort. Eighty-four patients diagnosed with TMD by functional examination of the masticatory system responded to the protocol questions and indicated the severity of signs and symptoms using an eleven point numerical scale (Phase 1). Forty-two patients were fitted with an occlusal splint (treated group) and the remaining participants did not use a splint (control group). The protocol questions were asked after 50 days of treatment (Phase 2). Based on the results of nonparametric statistical analysis, the incidence of signs and symptoms was high in Phase 1 and significant, with no difference between the groups, whereas the treated and control groups differed in Phase 2. A comparison between Phases 1 and 2 showed that only the treated group presented a reduction in the severity of signs and symptoms. The study showed that using this protocol, it is possible to define the frequency and severity of symptoms as well as the effect of the treatment. The advantage of this protocol is that it would complement the data obtained using clinical examination with information provided by the patient in a measurable manner.

[Anterior open bite: a formula for the differential diagnosis]. / Mordida aberta anterior: uma fórmula para o diagnóstico diferencial.

BACKGROUND: The differentiation between dental and skeletal anterior open bite, both with distinct etiologies and characteristics, is necessary to establish adequate orthodontic and speech-language treatment procedures. AIM: To establish a formula for the differential diagnosis of dental anterior open bite and skeletal anterior open bite based on a cephalometric analysis of the angles that measure the mandibular plane inclination (NS.GoGn), the vertical and anteroposterior mandibular growth (NSGn), and the Facial Axis angle. METHOD: 78 lateral radiographies, of individuals with ages varying from 6 to 13 years, were analyzed and divided into two groups: dental anterior open bite and skeletal anterior open bite. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the groups regarding the measurements of the angles: for the group with skeletal anterior open bite the NS.GoGn and the NSGn angles were bigger and the Facial Axis angle was smaller when compared to the group with dental anterior open bite. The adjustment to the linear function resulted in a formula that determines the type of anterior open bite with only 3.5% of error. CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to establish a high precision formula for the differential diagnosis between dental and skeletal open bite, based on the angle measurements of NS.GoGn NSGn and Facial Axes. The presented formula for the differential diagnosis has research and clinical applicability.