ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and usefulness of dual-phase 99mTc-Sestamibi scintigraphy (SS) and sonography (US) of the neck, alone and in combination, as noninvasive adenoma localizing procedures in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism prior to parathyroidectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the charts of 79 patients with parathyroid (PT) adenomas and confirmed diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism who were evaluated with SS and US prior to successful parathyroidectomy. RESULTS: Ninety-three adenomas were removed during bilateral neck exploration. SS alone showed a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 79% compared with 89% and 75%, respectively, for US performed after SS on the same day. Combination of the 2 procedures yielded a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 90%, with 22% discordant results. The differences in sensitivity and specificity between the 2 techniques alone or in combination were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: No benefit was gained from using both SS and US for the preoperative localization of PT adenomas in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Each technique can be negatively affected by thyroid enlargement and nodularity. US, when performed by a skilled operator, is a reliable tool for PT adenoma localization. If the US findings are inconclusive, SS should be used.
Subject(s)
Adenoma/diagnostic imaging , Hyperparathyroidism, Primary/diagnostic imaging , Parathyroid Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Radiopharmaceuticals , Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Care , Male , Middle Aged , Parathyroid Hormone/analysis , Parathyroidectomy , Postoperative Complications , Radionuclide Imaging , Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Thyroid Gland/diagnostic imaging , Thyroid Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography , Vocal Cord Paralysis/etiologyABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: Captopril renography is a reliable, widely used test for the functional diagnosis of renovascular hypertension. Well-recognized drawbacks of the procedure include reduced accuracy in patients with bilateral disease or renal impairment as well as the possible interference from concurrent antihypertensive medication (diuretics, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers). Currently, no data exist regarding the reliability of captopril renography in patients with renovascular hypertension evaluated while they are under chronic treatment with angiotensin II (AT1) receptor antagonists (Sartans). Moreover, the renographic response of the kidney with renal artery stenosis to prolonged therapy with angiotensin II receptor antagonists has not yet been evaluated. METHODS: We investigated the diagnostic effectiveness of (99m)Tc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine captopril renography performed after acute addition of 25 mg of captopril to the daily dose of AT1 receptor antagonist in 13 patients with unilateral renal artery stenosis and subsequent evidence of renovascular hypertension, based on short-term (3 mo) blood pressure outcome after revascularization. The renographic evaluation was first performed after ingestion of the daily therapy of angiotensin II receptor antagonist alone (Sartan renography) and was repeated within 7 d after the acute addition of 25 mg of captopril to chronic treatment with angiotensin II receptor antagonist (captopril-Sartan renography). A cohort of 13 patients with a final diagnosis of essential hypertension was chosen as the control subjects. RESULTS: Twelve of 13 patients were correctly detected by captopril-Sartan renography (92% sensitivity), and 3 subjects were also identified without the addition of captopril. Adding captopril to Sartan therapy resulted in a slight reduction in mean arterial blood pressure, while significant side effects were never observed. No false-positive results were found in the 13 patients with essential hypertension. CONCLUSION: We conclude that performing captopril renography with the acute addition of 25 mg of captopril to the chronic monotherapy with Sartans has the same diagnostic effectiveness as performing captopril renography alone. Interrupting the vasoactive action of angiotensin II alone on the efferent glomerular arteries, which can also be selectively achieved by chronic administration of angiotensin II receptor antagonists, does not fully explain the effectiveness of captopril renography in detecting renovascular hypertensive patients.
