Lower extremity woven and nonwoven venous stent morphology and luminal changes.

OBJECTIVE: Venous stents are a common treatment modality for obstructive venous disease. Venous stents differentiate themselves by either a woven or braided structure, open or closed cell arrangement or based on material composition (elgiloy vs nitinol). Changes in the morphology of venous stents over time may contribute to restenosis or thrombosis. Woven elgiloy stents are prone to proximal and distal edge deformation compared with dedicated venous stents, which offer increased radial force at stent edges. The objective of this study is to describe luminal morphological changes among various venous stents and between woven to nonwoven venous stent configuration, over time. METHODS: A retrospective review at a single institution between January 2014 and June 2021 identified patients treated with venous stents. Patients with iliac and/or femoral venous stents with intraoperative intravascular ultrasound and a postoperative computed tomography scan were included in the study. Cross-sectional diameters measurements were taken at proximal, middle, and distal portions of each stent from intravascular ultrasound examination at the time of initial stenting and compared with the cross-sectional diameter measurements taken from computed tomography imaging at follow-up. A paired t test was used to compare the luminal change with a D'Agostino-Pearson test used for normality. RESULTS: Fifty-four stents distributed among 38 patients were identified. The mean time to follow-up was 17.5 months. Stents were placed in the common iliac vein (n = 37, 68.5%), external iliac vein (n = 14, 25.9%), and common femoral vein (n = 3, 5.6%). Implanted stents included the Boston Scientific Wallstent (n = 23, 42.6%), Bard Venovo (n = 3, 5.6%), Boston Scientific Vici (n = 23, 42.6%), and Medtronic Abre (n = 5, 9.3%). The mean luminal loss was measured at 2.12 mm proximally (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-2.60; P<.001), 1.29 mm at the mid-stent (95% CI, 0.83-1.74, P<.001), and 1.56 mm distally (95% CI, 0.99-2.12; P<.001). There was no significant difference in luminal changes between woven and nonwoven stents at proximal (P = .374), middle (P = .179), and distal (P = .609) stent measurements. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports morphological changes within venous stents and between woven and nonwoven venous stents. Our findings demonstrate that the edge-stent luminal decrease traditionally attributed to woven configurations also occurs with the newer nonwoven stents. Additional factors such as anatomical location, pelvic curvature, and other external forces may be accountable for this change rather than geometrical configuration of the stent.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nonoperative Management for SVS Grade II Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury.

BACKGROUND: Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) grade II blunt traumatic aortic injury is defined as intramural hematoma with or without external contour abnormality. It is uncertain whether this aortic injury pattern should be treated with endovascular stent-grafting or nonoperative measures. Since the adoption of the SVS Guidelines on endovascular repair of blunt traumatic aortic injury, the practice pattern for management of grade II injuries has been heterogenous. The objective of the study was to report natural history outcomes of grade II blunt traumatic aortic injury. METHODS: A systematic review of published traumatic aortic injury studies was performed. Online database searches were current to November 2022. Eligible studies included data on aortic injuries that were both managed nonoperatively and classified according to the SVS 2011 Guidelines. Data points on all-cause mortality, aorta-related mortality and early aortic intervention were extracted and underwent meta-analysis. The methodology was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in the final analysis with a total of 204 cases of SVS grade II blunt traumatic aortic injury treated nonoperatively. The outcomes rates were estimated at 10.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.7%-14.9%) for all-cause mortality, 2.9% (95% CI 1.1%-5.7%) for aorta-related mortality, and 3.3% (95% CI 1.4%-6.2%) for early aortic intervention. The studies included in the analysis were of fair quality with a mean Downs and Black score 15 (±1.8). CONCLUSIONS: Grade II blunt traumatic aortic injury follows a relatively benign course with few instances of aortic-related mortality. Death in the setting of this injury pattern is more often attributable to sequelae of multisystem trauma and not directly related to aortic injury. The current data support nonoperative management and imaging surveillance for grade II blunt traumatic aortic injury instead of endovascular repair. Longer-term effects on the aorta at the site of injury are unknown.

Comprehensive framework of factors accounting for worse aortic aneurysm outcomes in females: A scoping review.

Sex-based outcome studies have consistently documented worse results for females undergoing care for abdominal aortic aneurysms. This review explores the underlying factors that account for worse outcomes in the females sex. A scoping review of studies reporting sex-based disparities on abdominal aortic aneurysms was performed. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Factors that account for worse outcomes in the females sex were identified, grouped into themes, and analyzed. Key findings of each study are reported and a comprehensive framework of these factors is presented. A total of 35 studies were identified as critical in highlighting sex-based disparities in care of patients with aortic aneurysms. We identified the following 10 interrelated themes in the chain of aneurysm care that account for differential outcomes in females: natural history, risk factors, pathobiology, biomechanics, screening, morphology, device design and adherence to instructions for use, technique, trial enrollment, and social determinants. Factors accounting for worse outcomes in the care of females with aortic aneurysms were identified and described. Some factors are immediately actionable, such as screening criteria, whereas device design improvement will require further research and development. This comprehensive framework of factors affecting care of aneurysms in females should serve as a blueprint to develop education, outreach, and future research efforts to improve outcomes in females.

Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms are found in up to 6% of men and 1.7% of women over the age of 65 years and are usually asymptomatic. The natural history of aortic aneurysms is continued dilation leading to rupture, which is associated with an overall 80% mortality. Of the patients with ruptured aneurysms that undergo intervention, half will not survive their hospitalization. Reduction in aneurysm mortality is therefore achieved by prophylactic repair during the asymptomatic period. On a population-based level, this is supported by abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programs. Approximately 60% of abdominal aortic aneurysms are confined to the infrarenal portion of the aorta and are amenable to repair with off-the-shelf endovascular devices. Endovascular techniques have now replaced open surgery as the primary modality for aneurysm repair.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular interventions for Stanford type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: The standard surgical approach to Stanford type A aortic dissection is open repair. However, up to one in four patients will be declined surgery because of prohibitive risk. Patients who are treated nonoperatively have an unacceptably high mortality. Endovascular repair of the ascending aorta is emerging as an alternative treatment for a select group of patients. The reported rates of technical success, mortality, stroke, and reintervention have varied. The objective of the study was to systematically report outcomes for acute type A dissections repaired using an endovascular approach. METHODS: The systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. We performed online literature database searches through April 2020. The demographic and procedural characteristics of the individual studies were tabulated. Data on technical success, short-term mortality, stroke, and reintervention were extracted and underwent meta-analysis using a random effects model. RESULTS: Fourteen studies with 80 cases of aortic dissection (55 acute and 25 subacute) were included in the final analysis. A wide variation was found in technique and device design across the studies. The outcomes rates were estimated at 17% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-26%) for mortality, 15% (95% CI, 8%-23%) for technical failure, 11% (95% CI, 6%-19%) for stroke and 18% (95% CI, 9%-31%) for reintervention. The mean Downs and Black quality assessment score was 13.9 ± 3.2. CONCLUSIONS: The technique for endovascular repair of type A aortic dissection is feasible and reproducible. The results of our meta-analysis demonstrate an acceptable safety profile for inoperable patients who otherwise would have an extremely poor prognosis. Data from clinical trials are required before the technique can be introduced into routine clinical practice.

Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic preconditioning is an innate mechanism of cytoprotection against ischemia, with potential for end-organ protection. The primary goal of this study was to systematically review the literature to determine the effect of ischemic preconditioning on outcomes after open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: The methodology followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. We included randomized clinical trials that evaluated the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in reducing morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing open or endovascular AAA repair surgery. The primary outcomes were death, myocardial infarction, and renal impairment. Outcomes were addressed separately for open AAA repair and endovascular AAA repair (EVAR). Data were collected on patient characteristics, methodology, and preconditioning protocol for each trial. RESULTS: Nine trials of ischemic preconditioning in aortic aneurysm surgery were included with a total of 599 patients; 336 patients were included in the open AAA repair meta-analysis, and 263 patients were included in the EVAR meta-analysis. For both open and endovascular repairs, ischemic preconditioning did not have a significant effect on death, myocardial infarction, or renal impairment requiring dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: The randomized clinical trials investigating the effect of ischemic preconditioning on outcomes after open and endovascular AAA repair that have been completed to date have not been adequately powered to evaluate improvements in patient-important outcomes. The evidence is insufficient to support the use of ischemic preconditioning for AAA repair in clinical practice. The variability in treatment effect across studies may be explained by clinical and methodological heterogeneity.

Ectopic origin of the ascending pharyngeal artery: implications for carotid surgery.

In its normal anatomy, the extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) does not have branches. The most common cause of an extracranial ICA branch is the ectopic placement of one of the named external carotid artery branches. Other causes of extracranial ICA branches include persistent fetal carotid-vertebrobasilar anastomoses and recannalized intersegmental arteries. In this case, report we describe a 55-year-old male who was found to have an ascending pharyngeal artery (APA) arising from the ICA during neck dissection. The aberrant APA was not identified on pre-operative imaging. The patient underwent a successful carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with preservation of flow through the ascending pharyngeal. We review the literature on the origin of the APA and discuss the clinical implications of extracranial ICA branches.

Effects of renal sympathetic denervation on blood pressure, sleep apnoea severity and metabolic indices: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) significantly reduces blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension, who commonly have obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). These patients are considered particularly responsive to the antihypertensive effects of RSD, but additional benefits of metabolic control on sleep apnoea severity have not been thoroughly investigated. METHODS: The effect of RSD was evaluated prospectively in a cohort of patients with OSA (apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥15 events per hour and an Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score ≤9) and treatment resistant hypertension. Changes in blood pressure, polysomnographic parameters and metabolic indices were evaluated at baseline and six months post procedure. RESULTS: At baseline, mean office blood pressure was 166.3/92.8 (14.5/11.7) mmHg and mean ambulatory blood pressure was 154.0/87.3 (11.9/8.5) mmHg. At six months post RSD, mean office blood pressure reduced by 6.6/6.5 (1.9/2.0) mmHg (p < 0.05) and mean ambulatory blood pressure reduced by 8.3/6.2 (2.3/2.0) (p < 0.05). The mean AHI at baseline was 21.3 events/h and 20.5 events/h at six months post RSD, with a mean reduction of 0.9 events/h (95% CI -0.7-1.6, p = 0.39). Glucose at two hours/2 h following tolerance testing reduced by 1.14 mmol/L (95% CI 0.22-2.06, p = 0.03) but changes in other metabolic indices were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: In patients with resistant hypertension and OSA, RSD resulted in modest improvements in blood pressure control, but no significant changes in sleep apnoea severity. Our study showed small increments in glucose tolerance but no significant changes in other markers of carbohydrate or lipid metabolism.

Transseptal puncture - Review of anatomy, techniques, complications and challenges.

In recent years, the transseptal puncture approach has enabled passage of increasingly large and complex devices into the left atrium. Traditional tools remain effective in creating and dilating the initial puncture, with an acceptable safety profile. Even for skilled operators, the procedure is technically demanding and requires sound understanding of atrial anatomy. Intracardiac echocardiography is useful in cases of previous septal repair, poorly defined fossa ovalis anatomy or when considering patent foramen ovale portal crossing. Iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD) is the most commonly encountered long-term complication and there is increasing evidence that larger devices are leading to symptomatic defects. The size of the sheath crossing the septum is the strongest predictor of iASD formation but other factors such as longer procedure times, significant catheter manipulation and high pulmonary pressures also contribute. Transcatheter mitral valve repair involves the use of large 22 Fr catheters which carry alarmingly high rates of defect persistence with precipitation of symptoms and possible influence on mortality. Long-term follow up data, particularly beyond the 12-month period are lacking and resultantly, evidence to guide management is sparse. Refinements of conventional instruments, as well as innovations to puncture the septum without mechanical pressure, herald a progressively safer future for the transseptal technique.

Right atrial thrombus and massive pulmonary embolism refractory to thrombolytic therapy: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Unsuccessful thrombolysis in the setting of massive pulmonary embolism confers poor prognosis and the optimal management strategy is unknown. Options include re-thrombolysis and embolectomy. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 32-year-old lady presented with massive pulmonary embolism accompanied by an intermittently-obstructive right atrial thrombus. Failure to improve with thrombolytic therapy prompted transfer to our cardiothoracic unit for emergency surgical embolectomy. The procedure and postoperative course were without complications and the patient made a complete recovery. DISCUSSION: Contemporary data has favoured thrombolytic therapies over surgical embolectomy as the initial management strategy in massive pulmonary embolism. This case is a timely reminder of the role that surgery retains in the management of these critically ill patients, particularly when cases are complicated. We illustrate the importance of rescue surgical embolectomy in the management of massive pulmonary embolism following unsuccessful thrombolysis. In addition, we briefly review other scenarios in the management of massive pulmonary embolism where lower threshold for surgical intervention is warranted. CONCLUSION: Although current data are insufficient to direct a high level of evidence-based care, this case report and others highlight the feasibility and safety of surgical embolectomy in complicated cases of massive pulmonary embolism.

Ductus arteriosus aneurysm presenting as hoarseness: successful repair with an endovascular approach.

An aneurysm of the ductus arteriosus is a rare finding, particularly in the adult population. These saccular aneurysms arise at the site of an incompletely obliterated ductus arteriosus along the lesser curvature of the aortic arch. Left untreated, it is associated with a high risk of potentially life-threatening complications including rupture, infection and thromboembolism. As a result, surgical correction is recommended. Previously, options were limited to open repair but as endovascular experience grows, novel techniques afford safer and less invasive alternatives. In contrast, neonatal ductus arteriosus aneurysms may regress spontaneously and expectant treatment can be justified. We present the case of a 74-year-old woman who presented with hoarseness secondary to a ductus arteriosus aneurysm; a diagnosis consistent with Ortner's syndrome. The patient underwent an uncomplicated endovascular repair using the chimney-graft technique.