Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Ann Chir Plast Esthet ; 63(1): 69-74, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29032878

ABSTRACT

Today's customary techniques for pharyngo-esophageal reconstruction are jejunum and radial forearm free flaps. In this type of reconstruction, the jejunum flap is considered as the reference, but when its harvesting is not possible, the radial forearm flap is used. Since perforator flaps have begun to be developed, the anterolateral thigh flap (ATF) has become increasingly prominent in pharyngo-esophageal reconstruction. The aim of our study was to describe the use of the anterolateral perforator flap in pharyngo-esophageal reconstruction (indications, harvesting method, flap design) and to discuss its advantages and drawbacks as regards oral feeding and esophageal speech.


Subject(s)
Esophagoplasty/methods , Perforator Flap/transplantation , Thigh/surgery , Enteral Nutrition , Esophageal Diseases/surgery , Esophagectomy/methods , Humans , Laryngectomy/methods , Pharyngectomy/methods , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Speech , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Doppler
2.
Ann Chir Plast Esthet ; 60(4): 262-7, 2015 Aug.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26066855

ABSTRACT

AIM OF THE STUDY: The main goal is to determine if the delay before going back to work after implant-based breast augmentation surgery is influenced by the healthcare coverage criteria. MEANS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, single center based study, patients who underwent implant-based breast augmentation surgery (excluding reconstructive surgery) in the past 3 years with a minimum follow-up of 1 month were questioned by telephone. Patients who had early postoperative complications, or no professional activity, were excluded. The demographic and perioperative data were collected and two groups were compared: those who were covered by the healthcare system and those who were not. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included. The two groups were comparable concerning the demographic (age, BMI, children, work intensity, smoking status, comorbidity) and surgical data (surgical approach, type, volume and position of the implant, operative time and drainage). There was a significant difference between the groups concerning the delay of return to work (P=0.0001): 18.4 days for reimbursed patients versus 9.45 days for patients without healthcare coverage. CONCLUSION: For the same implant-based breast augmentation surgery, and for the same population, the duration of postoperative recovery period doubles for the patients for whom surgery is reimbursed by the healthcare system.


Subject(s)
Breast Implantation , Insurance Coverage , Mammaplasty , National Health Programs , Return to Work/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , France , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...