Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Future Oncol ; 17(8): 943-954, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33289432

ABSTRACT

Aim: The CAVIDIOR study evaluated quality of life (QoL) in patients with breakthrough cancer pain receiving palliative radiation therapy in radiation oncology departments (RODs) in Spain. Patients & methods: Prospective observational study at 11 Spanish RODs (July 2016-November 2017). QoL was assessed using Short Form Health Survey 12. Secondary end points were sleep quality, caregiver burden and patient/perception of improvement. Results: QoL improved according to the Short Form Health Survey 12 mental component. Sleep quality and caregivers' burden improved significantly. Conclusion: Breakthrough cancer pain is highly prevalent and can be substantially reduced with appropriate diagnosis and management in RODs. Along with the QoL questionnaire, sleep quality and caregiver burden provide a more comprehensive assessment of overall health status in patients receiving radiation therapy in RODs. Clinical trial registration: NCT02836379 (ClinicalTrials.gov).


Subject(s)
Breakthrough Pain/epidemiology , Cancer Pain/epidemiology , Neoplasms/complications , Palliative Care/methods , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breakthrough Pain/etiology , Breakthrough Pain/psychology , Breakthrough Pain/therapy , Cancer Pain/diagnosis , Cancer Pain/psychology , Cancer Pain/therapy , Caregivers/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Pain Measurement/statistics & numerical data , Palliative Care/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Radiation Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Spain/epidemiology
2.
Onco Targets Ther ; 11: 5865-5872, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30271169

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this multicenter, prospective, observational, open-label study was to evaluate the use and tolerability of dermo-cosmetic products in preventing skin reactions associated with cancer treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 12-product kit was supplied to patients before chemotherapy began and was to be used throughout the treatment phase. Cutaneous adverse events were evaluated at each treatment session. Physicians evaluated skin reactions (edema, erythema, dryness, desquamation, pigmentation disorders, and cracks) and gave their opinion on the skin benefit for patients at the end of the study. Patients also evaluated the product benefit using the Patient Benefit Index (PBI) questionnaire. Results were analyzed by subgroups of casual and regular users, based on number and frequency of products used. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients were enrolled in cancer services in Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and Canada. Mean age was 59 years with 71% being female. Product tolerance on whole body was rated good to excellent for at least 89% of the patients for each product. Aggravated skin reactions during the study were reported more frequently by casual users than regular users (39.5% versus 22%; p=0.029). Similarly, casual users reported more erythema aggravation (p=0.02) and desquamation (p=0.03) than regular users. PBI >1 was reported for 95.5% of patients and regular users had significantly higher scores than casual users (p=0.049). DISCUSSION: Overall, the 12-product kit was very well tolerated, with regular users reporting benefits more frequently than casual users. Results support international recommendations to use appropriate skin care products to minimize the impact of cutaneous reactions associated with chemotherapy.

3.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 7(8): 332-5, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16185601

ABSTRACT

The concurrent use of erythropoietin beta (EPO)and radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients has been reported by Henke et al (Lancet 2003;362:1255-60) to correct anemia and impair cancer control. Due to the potential impact in daily clinical practice of this information a systematic critical review of the mentioned article was performed. Authors selected 10 arguments to question the contents regarding methodological and statistical aspects of the trial, and added 14 comments of controversy in more basic scientific concepts mentioned in the text as published. The panel including epidemiologist and radiation oncologists with expertise in clinical research concluded with 5 additional remarks recommending caution in interpretation of these results in terms of changes in daily practice of anemic patients support, and advising not to use EPO at experimental doses or after reaching physiological concentrations of hemoglobin.


Subject(s)
Anemia/drug therapy , Erythropoietin/adverse effects , Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Erythropoietin/therapeutic use , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...