CLAD: A realistic Continual Learning benchmark for Autonomous Driving.

In this paper we describe the design and the ideas motivating a new Continual Learning benchmark for Autonomous Driving (CLAD), that focuses on the problems of object classification and object detection. The benchmark utilises SODA10M, a recently released large-scale dataset that concerns autonomous driving related problems. First, we review and discuss existing continual learning benchmarks, how they are related, and show that most are extreme cases of continual learning. To this end, we survey the benchmarks used in continual learning papers at three highly ranked computer vision conferences. Next, we introduce CLAD-C, an online classification benchmark realised through a chronological data stream that poses both class and domain incremental challenges; and CLAD-D, a domain incremental continual object detection benchmark. We examine the inherent difficulties and challenges posed by the benchmark, through a survey of the techniques and methods used by the top-3 participants in a CLAD-challenge workshop at ICCV 2021. We conclude with possible pathways to improve the current continual learning state of the art, and which directions we deem promising for future research.

A Continual Learning Survey: Defying Forgetting in Classification Tasks.

Artificial neural networks thrive in solving the classification problem for a particular rigid task, acquiring knowledge through generalized learning behaviour from a distinct training phase. The resulting network resembles a static entity of knowledge, with endeavours to extend this knowledge without targeting the original task resulting in a catastrophic forgetting. Continual learning shifts this paradigm towards networks that can continually accumulate knowledge over different tasks without the need to retrain from scratch. We focus on task incremental classification, where tasks arrive sequentially and are delineated by clear boundaries. Our main contributions concern: (1) a taxonomy and extensive overview of the state-of-the-art; (2) a novel framework to continually determine the stability-plasticity trade-off of the continual learner; (3) a comprehensive experimental comparison of 11 state-of-the-art continual learning methods; and (4) baselines. We empirically scrutinize method strengths and weaknesses on three benchmarks, considering Tiny Imagenet and large-scale unbalanced iNaturalist and a sequence of recognition datasets. We study the influence of model capacity, weight decay and dropout regularization, and the order in which the tasks are presented, and qualitatively compare methods in terms of required memory, computation time, and storage.