Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 53(2): 410-416, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34613575

ABSTRACT

In patients with left ventricular thrombus (LVT) after acute myocardial infarction (MI), both anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapies are needed. It is unknown whether dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) is able to reduce the incidence of bleeding complications without significantly increasing the number of thromboembolic events, compared to triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT). We retrospectively evaluated all post-MI patients with LVT discharged on TAT or DAT from our tertiary hospital in the last decade. The primary outcome was the occurrence of all-cause mortality, thromboembolic events, hospitalizations for re-MI or heart failure and any bleeding at 1 year. A propensity-score matching was performed in order to compare the primary outcome between TAT and DAT. Out of 2564 acute MI patients, 83 (3.2%) had an LVT at echocardiography: 51 (61.4%) discharged on TAT and 32 (38.6%) on DAT. At clinical follow-up, completed in 93% of cases, the incidence of the primary outcome was 18.2% (25.5% in TAT and 6.7% in DAT group; p = 0.04). More than 2/3 of the events included in the primary outcome were related to bleeding complications and occurred during the first month from hospital discharge. In the matched cohort of 42 patients with follow-up data available, the primary outcome occurred in 9 (42.9%) patients in the TAT and 2 (9.5%) in the DAT group (p = 0.03). In post-MI patients with LVT, DAT seems more effective than TAT in reducing clinical outcome, especially early bleeding complications. A randomized study is warranted to confirm this hypothesis.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Thrombosis , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Patient Discharge , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Thrombosis/epidemiology , Thrombosis/etiology
2.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 77(10): 1563-1567, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33963425

ABSTRACT

AIM: There is no specific evidence on the antithrombotic management of survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We sought to compare the short-term outcome of unfractioned heparin (UFH) vs fondaparinux in OHCA survivors due to AMI admitted in our Institution in the last decade. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study on survivors of OHCA due to AMI managed with UFH or fondaparinux during the hospitalization. The primary outcome was the occurrence of any bleeding, all-cause mortality, cerebrovascular accidents, re-MI, and unplanned revascularization at 1 month. A propensity-score matching was performed to compare the outcome between UFH and fondaparinux. RESULTS: Out of 2083 AMI patients undergoing successful PCI, OHCA was present in 94 (4.5%): 41 (43.6%) treated with UFH and 53 (56.4%) with fondaparinux. At clinical follow-up, the incidence of the primary outcome was 65.9% in UFH and 35.8% in fondaparinux group (p = 0.007). More than half of the events included in the primary outcome were related to bleeding complications. In the matched cohort of 56 patients, the primary outcome occurred in 46.4% and 25.0% (p = 0.16), while bleeding was present in 32.1% and 7.1% (p = 0.04), in the UFH and fondaparinux group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis suggests that fondaparinux is safer than UFH in the management of OHCA due to AMI by reducing early bleeding complications at one month.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Fondaparinux/therapeutic use , Heparin/therapeutic use , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/drug therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Fondaparinux/administration & dosage , Fondaparinux/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Heparin/administration & dosage , Heparin/adverse effects , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/surgery , Retrospective Studies
3.
Heart Lung Circ ; 30(10): 1545-1551, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33994282

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) is commonly used during intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation to prevent thromboembolic events, no data or guidelines exist to support this strategy, especially in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study sought to compare the short-term outcome of UFH vs fondaparinux in AMI patients who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and IABP insertion. METHODS: The anticoagulation therapy of revascularised AMI patients who received IABP counterpulsation and admitted to a tertiary hospital in the last decade was retrospectively evaluated. The primary outcome was the occurrence of all-cause mortality, stroke or transient ischaemic attack, reinfarction, unplanned revascularisation, major or minor limb ischaemia, and any bleeding at 1 month. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the primary outcome between UFH and fondaparinux. RESULTS: Of 1,355 AMI survivors at 2 days after hospital admission and who underwent successful PCI, an IABP was inserted in 197 (14.5%): 72 (36.5%) were treated with UFH and 125 (63.5%) with fondaparinux (2.5 mg o.d.). At clinical follow-up, completed in 98.5% of cases, the incidence of the primary outcome was 22.5% in UFH and 5.7% in fondaparinux groups (p=0.0009). More than two-thirds of the events included in the primary outcome were related to early bleeding complications. In the matched cohort of 62 patients, the primary outcome occurred in 14 (45.2%) patients in the UFH and two (6.5%) in the fondaparinux group (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that fondaparinux is safer, by reducing early bleeding complications at one month, than UFH in the management of IABP.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Fondaparinux , Heparin , Humans , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping , Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Shock, Cardiogenic , Treatment Outcome
4.
Rev Port Cardiol ; 34(7-8): 497.e1-4, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26162290

ABSTRACT

Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is characterized by left ventricular (LV) hypertrabeculations and is associated with heart failure, arrhythmias and embolism. We report the case of a 67-year-old LVNC patient, under oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy for apical thrombosis. After she discontinued OAC, the thrombus involved almost the whole of the left ventricle; in a few months her condition worsened, requiring hospitalization, and despite heparin infusion she experienced myocardial infarction (MI), caused by embolic occlusion of the left anterior descending artery. Although infrequent as a complication of LVNC, and usually attributable to microvascular dysfunction, in this case MI seems due to coronary thromboembolism from dislodged thrombotic material in the left ventricle.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Isolated Noncompaction of the Ventricular Myocardium/complications , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Thromboembolism/complications , Administration, Oral , Aged , Female , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control , Thromboembolism/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...