Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the assessment of left atrial appendage size and blood flow velocity: a multicentre study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) in the assessment of left atrial appendage (LAA) size and function. METHODS: We considered 86 consecutive patients [56 male, 30 female; mean age 64 +/- 13 years, sinus rhythm 36 patients (42%); atrial flutter/fibrillation 50 patients (58%)] referred for transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and TTE. Maximum LAA transverse diameters and LAA peak flow velocities were calculated by two-dimensional and pulsed-wave Doppler analysis at TEE and TTE. RESULTS: LAA systolic transverse diameters were detectable in 78 patients (91%) by TTE and showed a significant correlation with TEE (r = 0.77, P < 0.0001). LAA peak flow velocities were measurable by TTE in 72 patients (84%) and were comparable with TEE (50.4 +/- 23 vs 47.3 +/- 23.2 cm/s, r = 0.67, P < 0.0001). A peak blood flow velocity of <25 cm/s at TTE was the best indicator of very low (<20 cm/s) LAA flow velocity as detected by TEE (sensitivity 93%, specificity 87%, area under the curve 0.94, P < 0.0001). Conversely, a peak blood flow velocity of >56 cm/s at TTE indicated a very high (> 40 cm/s) LAA flow velocity as detected by TEE (sensitivity 50%, specificity 96%, area under the curve 0.87; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Reliable LAA size and blood flow velocities can be obtained by TTE in consecutive, unselected patients. TTE identifies patients with low and high blood flow velocities in the LAA, providing helpful information for the definition of individual embolic risk.

Reliability of cardiac dimensions and valvular regurgitation assessment by sonographers using hand-carried ultrasound devices.

AIM: We sought to assess the reliability of some basic echocardiographic data obtained by trained sonographers using a hand-held ultrasound device. METHODS: One hundred and twelve consecutive patients (mean age 61, 64 males) referred for in-hospital or ambulatory routine echocardiography were considered. All patients underwent two-dimensional and colour Doppler examination performed by a trained sonographer equipped with a hand-held ultrasound device and by a certified cardiologist equipped with a standard platform, in random order. Indexed left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic transverse diameters, aortic root, end-systolic left atrium transverse diameter, end-diastolic interventricular septum and posterior wall thickness were calculated by two-dimensional left parasternal long-axis view in blind conditions. Mitral and aortic valve regurgitation were investigated by colour-Doppler imaging on parasternal and apical views and compared using a 0 to 4 semi-quantitative score. RESULTS: Overall feasibility was high for both settings (sonographers: 93%; cardiologists: 95%; P not significant). Excellent concordance of end-diastolic diameter (kappa 0.75), left atrium (kappa 0.76) and interventricular septum thickness (kappa 0.77) results was found. Good concordance was observed for end-systolic diameter (kappa 0.66), aortic root (kappa 0.64) and posterior wall thickness (kappa 0.67) results. A high linear correlation between the couples of results was present for all parameters. A good agreement of the mitral (kappa 0.66) and aortic (kappa 0.84) regurgitation scores was also found, with a low prevalence of discordant results (mitral regurgitation: 22%, aortic regurgitation: 9%) and no > or =2-point discrepancies. CONCLUSION: In a general population referred for Doppler echocardiography, basic cardiac linear dimensions and valvular regurgitation severity assessment by trained sonographers using hand-held ultrasound devices appear accurate and reliable for routine clinical use.