Contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography with commercially available triggering mechanisms and elliptic centric phase encoding.

OBJECTIVE: The technical feasibility of contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries was evaluated with routinely available timing sequences and elliptic centric acquisition. The image quality of the contrast-enhanced MR angiography was compared with that of multiple overlapping thin-section acquisition MR angiography (MOTSA MR angiography). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixty-three patients were enrolled. A 2-mL test bolus and commercially available software were used to time the gadolinium bolus. High-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography was performed with elliptic centric acquisition. RESULTS: The average time of bolus arrival was 17.3 sec (range, 12-25 sec). In 60 of the 63 patients, we had excellent or good visualization of the carotid bifurcation using contrast-enhanced MR angiography with little or no venous contamination. Two observers ranked delineation of stenosis and morphology of proximal internal carotid artery and overall diagnostic confidence statistically significantly higher for contrast-enhanced MR angiography compared with MOTSA: Ulceration, length of stenosis, and slow flow distal to a critical stenosis were better depicted with contrast-enhanced MR angiography than with MOTSA: Venetian blind artifact, saturation of slow or in-plane flow, and artifactual narrowing in carotid artery kinks plagued MOTSA but were not seen on contrast-enhanced MR angiography. MOTSA was graded superior to contrast-enhanced MR angiography in nine of 120 carotid bifurcations analyzed. CONCLUSION: High-resolution carotid contrast-enhanced MR angiography is technically feasible. We found a 95% success rate using commercially available hardware and software. The image quality with carotid contrast-enhanced MR angiography has improved so that it is equal or superior to the longer MOTSA in most patients.

Can noninvasive studies replace conventional angiography in the preoperative evaluation of carotid stenosis?

Most articles in 1995 demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and specificities of 90% to 98% in detecting carotid bifurcation stenosis using a combination of MR angiography and ultrasonography, reserving conventional angiography for cases of disparate stenosis with the noninvasive studies. Multiple reviews concluded that noninvasive studies were less morbid than conventional angiography when taking into account the risks of conventional angiography and surgery as well as the morbidity associated with unnecessary surgery (false-positive noninvasive study) or withholding indicated surgery (false-negative noninvasive study). Thus, the current literature suggests that non-invasive studies have indeed reached a point where they can replace conventional angiography in the preoperative evaluation of carotid bifurcation stenosis. It is paramount that each imaging center review its own sensitivity and specificity in detecting surgically significant carotid stenosis with noninvasive studies. High sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing percent carotid stenosis with noninvasive studies can occur today with routine imaging equipment, but it takes a great deal of effort and dedication on the part of the imaging center.

Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective study was to compare MR angiography of the carotid artery from the aortic arch through the circle of Willis using maximum-intensity projection (MIP) and multiplanar reformation (MPR) images with intraarterial angiography in the depiction of extracranial carotid atherosclerosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The carotid arteries in 20 patients were studied with MR and intraarterial angiography. MR angiography included two-dimensional (2D) time-of-flight (TOF) sequences from the aortic arch through the skull base and three-dimensional (3D) TOF sequences centered at the carotid bifurcation and multiple overlapping thin slab acquisition (MOTSA) from the skull base to above the circle of Willis. Targeted MIP images of the 2D and 3D TOF MR angiograms through each carotid bifurcation were obtained. Last, MPR images of the 3D TOF MR angiograms at the obliquity that showed the greatest stenosis were obtained. All studies were reviewed in a double-blinded fashion by two neuroradiologists. Caliper measurements of MR angiograms and intraarterial angiograms were made by using North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria. Global MIPs of the aortic arch and common carotid arteries from the 2D TOF MR angiograms and targeted MIPs of the intracranial carotid arteries from the MOTSA MR angiograms were compared with the intraarterial angiogram and graded as normal, mild, moderate, severely stenotic, or occluded. RESULTS: MPR of the 3D TOF MR angiograms was highly correlated with intraarterial angiograms for both observers 1 and 2 (0.94/p < .001, 0.96/p < .001 [Pearson correlation/p value]). No statistically significant difference between 3D TOF MPR and intraarterial angiography was seen with a paired t-test. With an alpha = 0.05 (5% probability of type 1 error), the power to detect a difference as small as +/- 5% stenosis between 3D TOF MPR and intraarterial angiogram was 80% for observer 1 and 90% for observer 2. Although both MIPs of the 2D and 3D TOF MR angiograms showed high Pearson correlation coefficients (0.83, 0.90) with intraarterial angiography, the paired t-test revealed a statistically significant difference in the estimation of carotid stenosis. Both observers thought the global MIPs of the 2D TOF MR angiogram allowed good to excellent visualization of the common carotid arteries. The aortic arch was seen in 70% of patients; most of the missed cases occurred early in our experience, when the 2D axial images were not placed sufficiently inferior to include the arch. No stenosis of the great vessel origins was seen in this study. All four stenoses of the intracranial internal carotid artery identified with intraarterial angiography were seen with the MOTSA MR angiogram but with a tendency to overestimate stenosis. Only one carotid siphon was thought to show severe stenosis on the MR angiogram. Intraarterial angiography showed a 50% stenosis. CONCLUSION: It is possible to image the entire carotid artery from the aortic arch through the circle of Willis with MR angiography in a clinically acceptable time. MPR of the 3D TOF MR angiogram reliably shows the percentage of carotid stenosis with no statistically significant difference compared with intraarterial angiography. The role of MR angiography in showing lesions in the circle of Willis or the aortic arch is promising, but the limited number of tandem lesions in this study makes it difficult to draw any conclusions.

Dural arteriovenous fistulas: evaluation with MR imaging.

The preangiographic diagnosis of cerebral dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF) can be difficult. The magnetic resonance (MR) images of 12 patients with angiographically proved DAVF were evaluated to characterize the appearance of these lesions and to identify those patients at increased risk for complications. Patients with DAVF demonstrating venous occlusive disease are at higher risk for complications from the arterialized collateral venous system. This venous occlusive disease is demonstrated best at arteriography. The MR imaging appearance of dilated cortical veins without a parenchymal nidus is suggestive of a DAVF with veno-occlusive disease. Eight of the 12 patients in our series demonstrated this finding at angiography. Complications, including infarction and hemorrhage, were identified at MR imaging in eight patients with MR imaging evidence of veno-occlusive disease. At angiography 42% of these complications were not apparent. In one patient with a DAVF draining into an unobstructed right sigmoid sinus, results of MR study were normal. Although patients with DAVF without veno-occlusive disease may have normal findings at MR imaging, DAVF associated with veno-occlusive disease and dilated pial venous drainage can be documented on MR images. This subset of DAVF patients, many of whom were identified only at MR imaging, is at higher risk for complications due to veno-occlusive disease. These patients are believed to require more urgent therapy. MR imaging is useful in the pretherapeutic planning for patients with DAVF.