Chronic Pelvic Pain in Congestion Pelvic Syndrome: Clinical Impact and Electromyography Pelvic Floor Activity Prior to and after Endovascular Treatment.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to characterize the clinical impact of endovascular treatment in Chronic Pelvic Pain (CPP) patients due to Pelvic Congestion Syndrome (PCS) and to assess the diagnostic value of surface electromyography (sEMG) studies of pelvic floor musculature (PFM) in PCS patients pre- and post-endovascular treatment. Between January 2019 and July 2023, we studied consecutive patients who were referred for interventional radiology assessment and treatment to a tertiary trauma care hospital, had evidence of non-obstructive PCS from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), had sEMG of PFM and who had undergone endovascular treatment. The primary outcome was clinical, defined as a change in symptom severity after endovascular treatment. The secondary outcome was a difference in the sEMG values pre- and post-endovascular therapy. RESULTS: We included 32 women (mean age 38 years). CPP was the leading symptom in 100% patients, followed by dysmenorrhea (75%) and post-coital pain (68.7%). Endovascular therapy included ovarian vein embolization in 28 patients (87.5%) and internal iliac vein embolization in only 2 patients (6.2%). After a median of 8 (range 6-10) months from endovascular treatment, 29 (90%) of patients reported an improvement of the main symptoms, and 15 (46%) were symptom-free. The sEMG values did not show a statistical difference pre- and post-PCS endovascular treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment appeared to be highly effective in CPP due to PCS and was associated with a low rate of complication. sEMG study could be useful in revealing alterations of PFM electrophysiology, but a difference pre- and post-embolization in PCS patients was not demonstrated.

Survival analyses of the ZeOxaNMulti trial: Follow-up randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of oral PMA-zeolite to prevent chemotherapy-induced side effects, especially peripheral neuropathy.

Following the previously published results of the clinical randomized ZeOxaNMulti trial, we evaluated the potential of the tested product PMA-ZEO (Multizeo Med) in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced side effects (especially peripheral neuropathy) within a 30-month follow-up analysis. The aim was to determine the disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in a study-population suffering from colorectal cancer that was previously enrolled in the ZeOxaNMulti trial from April 2015 to October 2018. The participants of the study were randomized to receive either PMA-ZEO or placebo while undergoing oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. A total of 104 patients (pts) (51% of participants randomized to the PMA-ZEO group and 49% to the placebo group), out of a total of 120 pts included in the ZeOxaNMulti trial in 2015, were followed up until March 2021 and were included in the follow-up analysis. According to the chemotherapy line, 44.2% of patients received chemotherapy in an adjuvant setting, and 55.8% of patients received chemotherapy as first-line treatment. The statistical analysis for DFS, PFS, and OS was performed by comparison of the end results with data from the PMA-ZEO/placebo-intervention start point. The analysis of OS did not show statistically significant differences in the first-line chemotherapy patients randomized to PMA-ZEO than among the placebo group (p = 0.1) over the whole period of follow-up (30 months). However, focusing on the PMA-ZEO supplementation time point (7 months), a positive and statistically significant trend (p = 0.004) was documented in the OS analysis for the first-line chemotherapy patients with increasing months of PMA-ZEO treatment compared to the placebo group. Furthermore, borderline statistical significance was reached for PFS at the PMA-ZEO supplementation time point (7 months) in the first-line chemotherapy patients (p = 0.05) for cancer progression events. After stratification of the first-line chemotherapy patients, statistically relevant trends for OS for age, comorbidities, and oxaliplatin dosage (cycles) were also determined. The overall results for DFS (adjuvant patients), PFS (first-line chemotherapy patients), and OS (adjuvant and first-line chemotherapy patients) were generally slightly better in the PMA-ZEO group than in the placebo group, even though no statistically significant results were obtained between the groups within the follow-up period until 2021 (30 months). Based on this follow-up analysis, protective effects of PMA-zeolite supplementation can be deduced. A positive trend and more importantly, significant results in PFS and OS for specific patient groups during and/or after PMA-ZEO treatment were determined, which supports the use of PMA-ZEO as an oncological supportive therapy.

Economic evaluation of subcutaneous versus intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a real-life study.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired peripheral neuropathy of immunological origin with a clinical presentation and course that are extremely variable. The therapeutic approach generally includes corticosteroid drugs, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) or plasmapheresis alone or in combination as first line therapy, and immunosuppressants. In 2014 the Italian regulatory agency included subcutaneous immunoglobulins (SCIGs) in the list of off-label drugs reimbursed by the national health service. Our aim is to compare costs and outcomes of IVIG versus SCIG therapy. METHODS: Patients medical records and therapeutic plans were retrospectively analysed to collect data on IVIG treatments 1 year before the switch to SCIG, and after 1 year of treatment with SCIG. A budget impact analysis was conducted through resource identification and quantification, and healthcare and non-health care costs evaluation. RESULTS: 13 of 34 patients affected by CIDP who were referred to our neurophysiopathological unit and treated with IVIG were switched to home-based SCIG. After 1 year of receiving SCIG, 12 patients remained neurologically stable and reported good outcomes. Considering the cost of IVIG (€30.97/g) and adding to this the direct and indirect healthcare costs, the total cost of IVIG treatment for the 12 patients in a year was €371 417.06, compared with the cost of SCIG (€51.57/g) for a total annual cost of €631 745.16, not including indirect costs. CONCLUSIONS: We observe a higher cost for SCIG treatment versus IVIG, which is not in line with data in the literature. However, SCIGs offer some important safety benefits and improvements in patient quality of life.