Wear and surface roughness of silorane composites after pH cycling and toothbrushing abrasion.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of toothbrushing abrasion associated with pH cycling on the surface roughness and wear of methacrylate- and silorane-based resin composites. METHODS: Microhybrid methacrylate-based (Filtek Z250), nanofilled methacrylate-based (Filtek Supreme Ultra) and microhybrid silorane-based (Filtek LS) composites were selected for this investigation. For each composite, two groups (n = 10) of rectangular specimens were made. The initial roughness (Ra) of all of the groups was evaluated based on the average of three random tracings with a profilometer, and each specimen had half of its surface protected with two layers of nail varnish to serve as controls. Half of the specimens of each resin were submitted to pH cycling, while the other half were stored in deionized water for 14 days. Subsequently, 100,000 strokes of simulated toothbrushing were performed. Final roughness and wear were measured with the same profilometer, and the values were submitted to ANOVA, Student's t-test and Tukey's test (P < 0.05). RESULTS: The data revealed an increase in surface roughness for Filtek Z250 and Filtek Supreme Ultra after toothbrushing, while Filtek LS showed the opposite behavior. Methacrylate-based composites presented lower wear values [Z250 (4.19 ± 1.73 µm); Supreme Ultra (4.16 ± 0.95 µm)], while the silorane-based composite presented increased surface roughness (11.51 ± 5.69 µm), particularly when submitted to pH cycling (15.31 ± 5.41 µm). Despite the good properties of silorane-based composites, particularly its smooth surface roughness even after pH cycling and toothbrushing abrasion, this composite still presented increased wear, which is an important issue for the development of new resin compositions.

Orthodontic movement of a maxillary incisor through the midpalatal suture: a case report.

Orthodontic space closure is a treatment alternative when a maxillary central incisor is missing. The objective of this report was to present an unusual treatment in which a right maxillary central incisor was moved through the midpalatal suture to replace the absent contralateral tooth. The biologic aspects and clinical appearance of the recontoured lateral and central incisors were analyzed. The position of the examined teeth and the appearance of the surrounding soft tissues were satisfactory; however, the upper midline frenulum deviated to the left. The incisor was successfully moved with no obvious detrimental effects as observed on the final radiographs. In the radiographic and tomographic examinations, the midline suture seemed to have followed the tooth movement. The patient expressed satisfaction with the results. It was concluded that orthodontic movement of the central incisor to replace a missing contralateral tooth is a valid treatment option, and the achievement of an esthetic result requires an interdisciplinary approach, including restorative dentistry and periodontics.