Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol ; 33(5): 498-501, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23185796

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate surgical margins in cases of ductal carcinoma through a histopathological exam using frozen sections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study encompassing 242 conservative surgeries, 179 of which included intraoperative frozen-section histopathology and 63 intraoperative nonfreezing techniques (macroscopy/gross examination and cytology). The results of such analyses were compared with those of the histology processing following paraffin embedment and hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) staining. A margin was deemed free when the distance between the tumor and the surgical border was equal to or greater than two millimeters. The factors given consideration for possibly affecting the results were: age, surgical aspects (skin removal and widening of surgical margins), histopathological findings (size, affected lymph nodes, and angiolymphatic invasion), and extensive intraductal and immunohistochemical components (estrogen, progesterone, Ki-67, and HER-2 receptors). In the statistical analyses, the chi-square test was used and negative predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: The negative predictive values were 87.1% and 79.3% for frozen and nonfrozen sections, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.14). The factors under consideration had no influence on the results of the intraoperative exam of the margins. CONCLUSION: The present study allowed to conclude that the intraoperative exam of the surgical margins by frozen section is not superior to a macroscopy and/or cytology exam.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Frozen Sections , Adult , Animals , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
2.
Ann Oncol ; 20(6): 1008-12, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19150942

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the case of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS), a second conservative surgical approach maybe considered in some motivated patients whereas in others mastectomy is unavoidable. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1997 to 2004, 282 patients presented at the European Institute of Oncology with an operable invasive IBTR after BCS. One hundred and sixty-one (57%) underwent a second conservative surgery, whereas 121 patients (43%) were given a mastectomy and represent the study population. We investigated the prognosis and determined predictive factors of outcome. RESULTS: Median time from primary breast cancer to IBTR was 41 months (range 5-213). Recurrences were T2-T4 and/or multifocal in 83 cases (68.6%). With a median follow-up of 5 years after mastectomy, 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 73.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 65.0% to 81.6%] and 50.4% (95% CI 40.9% to 59.8%), respectively. At the multivariate analysis, early onset of IBTR, presence of vascular invasion and Ki67 >or=20 of the recurrent tumour were found to significantly affect both DFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: In women who need mastectomy for IBTR, early onset of the relapse, high proliferation index and presence of vascular invasion represent the worst prognostic factors.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mastectomy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Mastectomy, Segmental , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...