Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype distribution in penile carcinoma: Association with clinic pathological factors.

BACKGROUND: Penile carcinoma (PC) is a rare, highly mutilating disease, common in developing countries. The evolution of penile cancer includes at least two independent carcinogenic pathways, related or unrelated to HPV infection. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence, identify HPV genotypes, and correlate with clinicopathological data on penile cancer. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study involving 183 patients with PC undergoing treatment in a referral hospital in Goiânia, Goiás, in Midwestern Brazil, from 2003 to 2015. Samples containing paraffin embedded tumor fragments were subjected to detection and genotyping by INNO-LiPA HPV. The clinicopathological variables were subjected to analysis with respect to HPV positivity and used prevalence ratio (PR), adjusted prevalence ratio (PRa) and 95% confidence interval (CI) as statistical measures. RESULTS: The prevalence of HPV DNA in PC was 30.6% (95% CI: 24.4 to 37.6), high-risk HPV 24.9% (95% CI: 18.9 to 31.3), and 62.5% were HPV 16. There was a statistical association between the endpoints HPV infection and HPV high risk, and the variable tumor grade II-III (p = 0.025) (p = 0.040), respectively. There was no statistical difference in disease specific survival at 10 years between the HPV positive and negative patients (p = 0.143), and high and low risk HPV (p = 0.325). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HPV infection was 30.6%, and 80.3% of the genotypes were identified as preventable by anti-HPV quadrivalent or nonavalent vaccine. HPV infections and high-risk HPV were not associated with penile carcinoma prognosis in this study.

Effect of the introducer technique compared with the pull technique on the peristomal infection rate in PEG: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Peristomal infection is a main complication of PEG. The pull technique appears to be associated with higher infection rates compared with the introducer technique, although published results are controversial. OBJECTIVE: To determine which technique is associated with a higher risk of infection. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Studies reporting rates of peristomal infection after PEG performed by either the pull or introducer technique. PATIENTS: This study involved 2336 patients from 6 comparative and 10 observational studies. INTERVENTION: Public MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine journal articles database), Excerpta Medica Database, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information databases and proceedings of two meetings, Digestive Disease Week and United European Gastroenterology Week, were searched. Both comparative and observational studies were included and analyzed separately. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Effect measures from each comparative study were reported as the odds ratio (OR). The pooled effect was then calculated. The infection rate in each observational study was also calculated, and a summary effect was then determined. RESULTS: In comparative studies, the risk of infection was significantly higher with the pull technique (OR 13.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.6-36.8; P < .0001). Similarly, observational studies also reported higher infection rates with the pull technique (10.7%; 95% CI, 4.9-21.8 with the pull technique vs 0.9%; 95% CI, 0.2-4.5 with the introducer technique). LIMITATIONS: Few studies were available for inclusion, and there was a high risk of bias among the comparative studies. CONCLUSION: The pull technique appears to be associated with a significantly higher risk of infection compared with the introducer technique.

The impact of cyclooxygenase-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor C immunoexpression on the prognosis of penile carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We assessed the influence of cyclooxygenase-2 and vascular endothelium growth factor-C immunoexpression on groin metastasis and cancer survival, and their association with histological variables in patients with penile carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the histological and cyclooxygenase-2/vascular endothelium growth factor-C immunohistochemical profiles of patients with penile carcinoma treated at a single institution between 2001 and 2008. Univariate and multivariate analysis was done to determine the impact of histological and immunohistochemical markers on the risk of inguinal metastasis and on cancer survival. Survival analysis of relevant variables was also done. RESULTS: Of the 127 patients enrolled 76 and 30 had positive cyclooxygenase-2 and vascular endothelium growth factor-C immunoexpression, respectively. Univariate analysis identified an association between vascular endothelium growth factor-C immunoexpression and groin metastasis, and certain histological variables. Logistic regression showed that high tumor grade, Jackson stage and vascular endothelium growth factor-C immunoexpression were independent predictors of inguinal metastasis. Cancer survival was only influenced by advanced Jackson stage and groin metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that vascular endothelium growth factor-C expression may help identify patients with an unfavorable clinical course of penile carcinoma. Cyclooxygenase-2 did not alter the risk of groin metastasis or cancer death. Inguinal disease and advanced Jackson stage were independent prognostic factors for worse cancer survival.